CME Group Expands Crypto Reference Rates to Asian Markets

Ripple Receives In-Principle Approval From Singaporean RegulatorRipple, the blockchain-based payments firm, has obtained in-principle regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to offer digital asset payments and token products in Singapore.Photo by Dids on PexelsODL service expansionThe approval, announced on Wednesday, will enable Ripple’s subsidiary, Ripple Markets Asia Pacific, to expand its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. ODL facilitates the seamless transfer of the XRP cryptocurrency across borders without the involvement of traditional banking intermediaries.Ripple had applied for an institutional payment license under Singapore’s Payment Service Act to secure the regulatory green light. In response to the approval, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse praised the MAS for its pragmatic and innovation-driven approach to cryptocurrency-related services.He expressed confidence that Singapore would serve as a prominent gateway for Ripple’s business operations in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region. On Twitter, Garlinghouse wrote: “As a major global financial center, Singapore led the way in taking a pragmatic, innovation-first approach to crypto — we’re incredibly proud @Ripple is one of a handful of firms (<20) to receive in-principle approval for a MAS MPI license for digital payment token services!”Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, explained that the regulatory approval from MAS would enhance Ripple’s ability to support forward-thinking customers who are exploring the potential of blockchain and crypto technologies to create a more inclusive and borderless financial system.Growing APAC presenceRipple’s presence in Singapore has already been growing significantly. In 2022, the company doubled its number of employees at its Asia Pacific headquarters, with Singapore becoming a major hub for ODL transactions. The MAS, recognizing the potential of fintech firms in the digital money services sector, published its Purpose Bound Money (PBM) white paper on Wednesday, proposing standards for such firms operating in Singapore.While Ripple has made progress with regulatory compliance in Singapore, it has faced legal challenges in other jurisdictions. Since December 2020, Ripple’s legal team has been dealing with a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing Ripple of conducting an unregistered securities offering with its XRP token.The case is expected to reach a verdict in the coming months. While the speculation is that the case has gone well for Ripple, it remains to be seen to what extent it can get the upper hand in taking on a cornerstone institution of the US establishment like the SEC.Either way, Ripple is moving to develop on a global basis. It has recently pursued further development in the Middle East via a Dubai expansion. In Hong Kong, it is collaborating with local regulators in trialing the use of its technology relative to real-world asset tokenization.The company has also established partnerships with central banks in Montenegro and Thailand, as well as numerous regional banks and financial institutions worldwide.The regulatory approval from MAS marks a significant milestone for Ripple, expanding its customer reach and positioning the company for further growth in the digital asset payment sector. Digital asset innovation is truly global and as many organizations are demonstrating, just as Ripple is in this instance, innovative curtailment in one region will simply manifest itself as greater development in another.

Hong Kong Enticing Crypto Firms from Mainland ChinaIn the wake of various scandals and high-profile bankruptcies, some governments have shunned the cryptocurrency industry, but Hong Kong is instead embracing mainland China crypto companies, urging them to relocate to the city in a bid to bolster its status as a financial hub.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsEmbracing cryptoAfter enduring an exodus of bankers amid a China security crackdown and stringent COVID curbs, Hong Kong is now making a concerted effort to revitalize its finance sector by embracing crypto. Top Hong Kong government officials, including Chief Executive John Lee, have voiced their support, and the city is planning to hold 100 crypto-related conferences and lavish parties throughout April. Hong Kong is “very serious about building an international virtual asset center,” said Xiao Feng, chairman of Hong Kong crypto exchange HashKey, which drew 13,000 people on the first day of its Hong Kong Web3 Festival, the most significant conference of the month.HashKey obtained a license to operate in Hong Kong last November, making it one of two licensed crypto exchanges in the city, alongside rival exchange OSL. Xiao told Reuters that many people in the crypto industry had initially assumed that Hong Kong would inevitably adopt the same regulations as mainland China. However, the government is now emphasizing that Hong Kong operates under the “One Country, Two Systems” framework and enforces distinct laws.SkepticsDespite this, many remain skeptical of Hong Kong’s promise of a stable regulatory regime on cryptocurrencies. One crypto venture capitalist, who spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the matter, expressed concern over China’s crypto ban, which still looms large in the background. “If Hong Kong can suddenly claim to be crypto-friendly, that switch can be flipped off just as quickly should things become challenging,” he said.Crypto licensing interestNevertheless, at least 10 companies with Chinese founders, including OKX, Bybit, and Huobi, have announced or are planning to announce their bid for licenses in Hong Kong. These firms, which have exited countries like Canada and the UK, are among the sponsors of the most glamorous Hong Kong parties this week. Bybit held a private dinner for industry heavyweights, and OKX reserved a rooftop venue overlooking Victoria Harbour, where guests could enjoy a stunning view.At one event on Tuesday, Tron founder Justin Sun, addressed a mainly Chinese-speaking audience, stating, “I can’t believe that we are having such conferences on Chinese soil.” Sun has been charged with fraud by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but he argued that the charges lacked merit and accused the regulator of targeting crypto players. “Hopefully, one day, we will have such events in Shanghai and Beijing,” he remarked.Despite the lingering concerns, Hong Kong is committed to establishing itself as a leading finance hub in the cryptocurrency industry and is sparing no effort to achieve its goals.

NFTs not subject to South Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection ActIn anticipation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act coming into effect in July of next year, the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has issued an advance notice regarding its subordinate statutes.Photo by Ethan Brooke on UnsplashSeven specific provisionsThe subsidiary regulations under the Act detail seven specific provisions aligned with the Act’s objectives. Firstly, assets categorized as electronic securities, mobile vouchers, deposit tokens backed by the Bank of Korea’s central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) will not be classified as virtual assets and hence, not regulated by this Act. However, in instances where NFTs are used as a means of payment for specific goods or services, they will be regarded as virtual assets.Secondly, banks will take responsibility for managing the deposits of users on cryptocurrency exchanges. This aligns with the Act’s requirement for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to keep users’ funds separate from their own, either by depositing them in, or entrusting them to, reputable institutions. Under these regulations, banks are required to manage users’ assets in a manner consistent with how investors’ deposits are handled under the Capital Markets Act. This means that banks are allowed to invest VASP users’ assets only in secure instruments, such as state and local government bonds, and are also obligated to pay fees to deposit owners, taking into account the yields of these investments.80% of user assets in cold walletsThe third key aspect of the regulations is that VASPs are required to store a minimum of 80% of user assets in cold wallets, which are not connected to the internet. This is higher than the current requirement of 70%, enhancing the security measures for users of virtual assets. To calculate the total value of a virtual asset at any given time, its total supply is multiplied by its average daily price over the past year. VASPs are obligated to assess the value of virtual assets every month.The fourth regulation mandates that VASPs must enroll in an insurance plan, contribute to a rainy day fund or accumulate reserves. This is to ensure they can fulfill their compensation responsibilities in the event of incidents like security breaches or technical failures. The required preparation amount is set at a minimum of 5% of the user assets stored in hot wallets, as these are more susceptible to risks. VASPs are required to update their compensation thresholds or reserves monthly and must take any necessary actions to comply with these requirements by the next working day following the update.Information disclosure guidelinesAnother regulation addresses the issue of insider trading in the context of the virtual asset market. Under the current Capital Markets Act, information is considered disclosed when it’s made available through disclosure systems of the FSC or the Korea Exchange (KRX). However, since the cryptocurrency market lacks a similar system, the new statute provides criteria for determining when information is deemed disclosed.For instance, if a VASP, including exchanges, releases crucial information about a virtual asset on an exchange and six hours pass, that information is regarded as disclosed. This acknowledges the non-stop nature of the crypto market. Moreover, information disclosed post 6 p.m. is treated as officially disclosed after 9 a.m. the next day.Additionally, if a virtual asset issuer publishes significant information about its token on a website hosting its white paper, the information is deemed public after one day. This is conditional upon the website being publicly accessible and having consistently provided important token information for the preceding six months.These rules aim to provide clarity and fairness in information disclosure in the crypto market, adapting the principles of traditional financial markets to the unique dynamics of virtual assets.No arbitrary suspension of transactionsThe sixth regulation restricts VASPs from arbitrarily halting deposits and withdrawals of virtual assets unless there are justifiable reasons for such actions. Acceptable circumstances for suspending these transactions include situations where the VASP experiences a technical disruption in its system, where regulatory authorities instruct a VASP to cease deposits and withdrawals or where cyberattacks or similar incidents have occurred or are clearly imminent.Lastly, virtual asset exchanges are required to monitor for abnormal transactions continuously. These are transactions that show substantial shifts in the prices or trading volumes of virtual assets, particularly in response to news or rumors that could influence cryptocurrency prices. If VASPs suspect unfair trading practices, they must report to the FSC or the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). When there is ample evidence of such activities, crypto exchanges are obligated to notify the police or the prosecutors’ office. In addition, the financial regulator has the authority to levy fines based on the prosecution’s decisions or after completing consultations with the prosecution if a year has passed since the day of the report.During the period of advance notice, which spans from Nov. 11 to Jan. 22, the FSC will seek comments from relevant organizations, experts and businesses. This process is aimed at refining the rules and regulations subordinate to the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Moving forward, the financial authorities plan to publish a set of guidelines and Q&A materials and conduct explanatory sessions, with the goal of ensuring a smooth implementation of the Act.