Wemade to Participate as Main Sponsor in G-STAR 2023

Bybit Extends UAE Tendrils via Blockchain ScholarshipDubai-headquartered crypto spot and derivatives trading platform Bybit, the third most popular cryptocurrency exchange globally, has announced a new partnership with the American University of Sharjah (AUS) as part of its ongoing commitment to promote crypto adoption in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).The collaboration was solidified through the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding in Sharjah, the UAE's third largest city. As a testament to this partnership, Bybit has contributed AED 1,000,000 ($272,000) to establish a scholarship fund, facilitating the academic and research endeavors of 20 students pursuing fintech and blockchain studies at AUS. Eligible students enrolled in computer science and computer engineering programs will be able to benefit from the Bybit Scholarship starting from the upcoming fall semester.Photo by Ainur Kamaev on UnsplashHackathon sponsorshipIn addition to the scholarship initiative, Bybit is dedicated to broader industry endeavors and will contribute an extra AED 100,000 ($27,200) to sponsor a hackathon for the UAE blockchain community. The inaugural AUS-Bybit Inter-College Hackathon is scheduled to take place during the 2023–2024 academic year at the AUS College of Engineering.The UAE has recognized the significant role of cryptocurrencies in its trade activities, and the thriving crypto and blockchain industry in the country serves as a testament to the government’s visionary approach. Dubai alone is home to more than 772 crypto companies, solidifying the UAE’s position as a hub for digital asset innovation. Consequently, the demand for blockchain talent is expected to rise in the region.Industry partnershipsDr. Susan Mumm, Chancellor of AUS, emphasized the university’s commitment to excellence in education, attributing its reputation to strong industry partnerships that bridge the gap between academia and the corporate world. Through the collaboration with Bybit, AUS students will gain access to the technical knowledge necessary to stay abreast of the latest developments in the crypto and blockchain industry.The establishment of the Bybit Scholarship further supports students’ education and skill enhancement. Dr. Mumm expressed the university’s goal of producing professionals and lifelong learners who can make a positive impact in a rapidly evolving world.Ben Zhou, co-founder and CEO of Bybit, highlighted the pivotal role of younger generations in propelling the blockchain revolution forward. Zhou expressed his pleasure in establishing the Bybit Scholarship at AUS, enabling talented students to future-proof their knowledge and skills. He extended his gratitude to AUS for providing opportunities to raise awareness about cryptocurrencies and sharing first-hand industry insights with students from one of the most esteemed universities in the region. Zhou eagerly anticipated being inspired by future engineers, blockchain scientists, and Web3 startup founders.Bybit, a prominent player in the crypto space, unveiled its Dubai headquarters in April, solidifying its commitment to the region and its aspiration to contribute to the growth of the digital asset ecosystem. In May the company gained outline approval to operate in Kazakhstan. Demonstrating further progress still, last month the firm confirmed that it was extending its service offering to include crypto lending.

Duncan Chiu, a member of Hong Kong's Legislative Council, has expressed concerns over the stringent regulations imposed on cryptocurrency exchanges by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). In an opinion piece for the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Chiu argued that these rigorous standards have deterred major global exchanges from entering the Hong Kong market, undermining confidence in the region's commitment to developing Web3 technologies. He highlighted the recent withdrawal of license applications by prominent exchanges such as OKX, Gate.io and HTX as indicative of the flaws in the current regulatory framework.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashLicensing system and industry developmentChiu criticized the fragmented approach to policy development for Hong Kong’s virtual asset market, noting that various aspects like VATP (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms), stablecoin issuance and virtual asset over-the-counter trading are managed by different departments without strategic industry consideration. He also mentioned feedback from license applicants who feel that the authorities lack a forward-thinking vision for fintech and are applying traditional financial principles too rigidly to the dynamic and innovative sector of Web3. Furthermore, Chiu pointed out the disconnect between the industry and regulators, particularly in the experience required of management in licensed crypto operations versus the practical experience of regulators in Web3, complicating effective communication and progress. 

Hong Kong Deems Crypto as PropertyIn dealing with a case involving defunct Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange Gatecoin, a Hong Kong judge has determined cryptocurrency as being property “capable of being held in trust.” Presiding over the case, Justice Linda Chan stated recently that Hong Kong takes a broad definition of what constitutes property.©Pexels/mitbg000Digital assets held in trustHaving expended efforts to try and recover funds from a former payments service provider that the company had partnered with, Gatecoin announced that it would shut down the business and commence the liquidation of the business in 2019. With bankruptcy proceedings being notoriously slow, that process continues today, resulting in Justice Chan’s recent determination.The notion of property held in trust is a common theme that has been explored in a number of cryptocurrency business bankruptcy processes recently, including the BlockFi, Celsius and FTX processes.Gatecoin has not proven to be any different in this regard. Liquidators had turned to the Hong Kong courts for direction as to how creditors’ digital assets, as held on the platform, should be defined. If property is deemed to have been held “in trust”, then that determination has implications for the owner of those assets relative to the bankruptcy proceedings.In the case of BlockFi, a determination was made in a US court that those who had simply custodied digital assets with the platform without earning any yield were property owners and that they should have their assets returned.The importance of Terms of Service (ToS)Alex Mashinsky, the founder and CEO of failed crypto lending competitor Celsius outlined to service users on a number of occasions that the assets remained their property even though his company used customer assets for various trading activities. The bankruptcy judge reached a different determination based on the terms of service. Service users had acknowledged in signing off on Celsius’ terms of service that assets held on the platform that accessed yield-bearing products became the property of Celsius when deposited within those products on the Celsius platform.Although it has not been dealt with yet, 1.4 million creditors relative to the bankruptcy process of failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX are likely to discover later this year if they can claim “in trust” property rights. An ad hoc group of creditors has taken legal action for the return of their digital assets on the basis of an assertion that the assets remained their property when transferred onto the platform.ImplicationsWhilst a seemingly uninteresting determination to anyone less informed about such bankruptcy proceedings, such decisions can have profound consequences. In a bankruptcy process, there is a hierarchy of creditors, with some having greater rights than others when it comes to the distribution of bankruptcy estate funds. Recognition of assets being held in trust as property would likely take those property owners out of the bankruptcy process, allowing the return of their funds (where available) while others who are classified as creditors get a distribution of whatever funds are left in the bankruptcy estate thereafter.Additional complexityGatecoin’s case was further complicated by the existence of various sets of terms of service. In two of the three instances, the court found that no trust language existed. There is one subset of creditors who may have the ability to claim their digital assets as property. The liquidators have agreed to identify them and contact them in that regard.While the process may be proving to be a minefield for Gatecoin’s creditors, it has served a broader purpose in crypto more generally as it has provided yet another opportunity for another jurisdiction, in this instance Hong Kong, to provide some more clarity with regard to the legal status and standing of cryptocurrency.