Uzbekistan’s New Private Bank Joins National Crypto Card Initiative

Korean Prosecutors Allocate $734K Budget for Crypto Crime InvestigationsThe South Korean Supreme Prosecutors’ Office has earmarked a budget of up to KRW 986 million (approximately $734,000) this year for investigations pertaining to virtual assets, according to data received by the local newspaper Law Times from the Ministry of Justice last Thursday. The significant size of the budget suggests that the prosecution is prioritizing efforts to combat the growing surge in virtual asset-related crimes.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBudget divisionWithin this budget, KRW 778 million has been designated for the purchase of software licenses for virtual asset tracing and analysis equipment, while KRW 280 million has been allocated for an integrated strategic plan to establish a platform for analyzing and tracing unauthorized virtual asset transactions. The budget for this platform consists of preliminary planning costs. Related expenditures are expected to increase as the project is fully implemented.“It is true that our budgets are being concentrated on crimes related to virtual assets due to the fact that they have recently become a social issue,” said a prosecution official. “It may not be a lot compared to our overall budget, but assigning almost KRW 1 billion for one specific field of investigation is still a considerate amount.”Rising crypto crimesIn Korea, crimes associated with virtual assets have been increasing annually. This includes tax evasion, bribery, foreign exchange law violations, and money laundering, as well as cryptocurrency market issues including issuance, listing, and distribution. According to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, reported cases of suspicious virtual asset transactions received by the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) surged from an average of 66 cases per month in 2021 to 900 cases in 2022, then 943 cases in 2023 — a fourteen-fold increase in just three years.Subsequently, the scale of the damages caused by cryptocurrency crimes has also seen a sharp rise. The total value of all reported damages skyrocketed from KRW 467.4 billion in 2017 to KRW 1.02 trillion last year, more than doubling in five years. The cumulative loss over this period exceeds KRW 5.3 trillion.Focused effortsThe prosecution has thus dispatched financial experts from organizations including KoFIU and Korea Exchange to create a joint virtual asset crime investigation unit under the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office dedicated to investigating cryptocurrency crimes.The prosecution’s Cybercrime Investigation Division has also begun developing a tracking system optimized for the Korean market to trace the flow of virtual assets. The foreign software that is currently being used for tracking comes with considerable expenses and limitations, particularly for tracking flows within the domestic market, where there are many transactions involving smaller, locally-issued cryptocurrencies called “kimchi coins.”“We are dedicating our manpower and technological development to virtual asset investigations,” said a high-ranking official from the prosecution. “We will also strive to secure the budget necessary for these efforts.”

While the Web3 sector seemed to be hamstrung by litigation and regulatory scrutiny in 2023 following multiple platform failures, it's going out with a bang in China with news of a $10 billion fund in Shenzhen to support Web3 startups.Photo by 李大毛 没有猫 on UnsplashFueling Web3 startup growthGBA Capital, a Chinese venture capital (VC) firm, made a significant announcement during the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Digital Economy Development Conference on Tuesday. The firm, backed by China's state-owned National Engineering Laboratory, unveiled plans to launch a substantial $10 billion Web3 fund. The conference also served as an educational platform, enlightening investors and attendees unfamiliar with the intricacies of the Web3 industry. Luo Jinhai, founder of Huoxun Finance and creator of the "Yuan Asset" concept, elucidated on the unique attributes of specific forms of digital assets, including independence, privacy, security, scarcity and liquidity. Metaverse focusThis initiative aims to fuel the growth of startups specializing in virtual reality, the metaverse and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), ultimately transforming the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao economic region into the global "meta-asset capital."  Meta-assets are virtual objects that serve as key components within the make-up of the metaverse. Haolong Li, the chairman of GBA Capital, outlined the ambitious vision, stating that the conference would facilitate "meta-asset global tours" in key international hubs such as Japan, Singapore, Dubai, Silicon Valley and Europe. The objective is to enhance the visibility of meta-assets and position the economic area as a leading force in the emerging Web3 landscape. Previous developments that have played out over the course of 2023 suggest that China is placing a particular focus on embracing metaverse technology, with a view towards integrating the metaverse with existing systems in the country.   The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China, in response to a proposal about promoting the development of the Web3 industry, emphasized ongoing research in areas such as the Metaverse, NFTs and decentralized identity management. In September the Ministry set out an action plan for the cultivation of a domestic metaverse. As part of that plan, it aspires to nurture three to five metaverse companies of global significance. GBA Capital, established by China Europe International Financial Group in Hong Kong, boasts strategic partnerships with key financial institutions, including the Asia Pacific Investment Bank and China's state-owned National Engineering Laboratory. The firm's focus on investment and incubation in the digital economy aligns with its goal of integrating industrial clusters, capital resources, corporate resources and policy advantages to offer comprehensive support and services to enterprises. In a related development, GBA Capital's subsidiary Zhongrong Global successfully raised an angel funding round at a valuation of 100 million Chinese yuan ($14 million) back in May. The funds will be allocated to Web3 project incubation and industrial services in the artificial intelligence sector. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area has experienced a surge in Web3 startups and overseas corporate relocations since the beginning of the year, setting the stage for GBA Capital's substantial Web3 accelerator fund.

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.