Bitstamp Raises Funds to Enable Asian Market Expansion

Asian Market Surge for XRP Amid Broader Market ImplicationsXRP, the cryptocurrency and native token used by real time gross settlement system, Ripple, has seen renewed activity in recent weeks in terms of trading volume. That trading volume appears to be more pronounced in Asian markets such as South Korea.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsThe XRP token has traded up 22% over the course of the past seven days, with a current unit price of $0.54. Trading volume has surged on South Korean exchanges such as Bithumb UpBit and Korbit where volume spiked 18%, 37% and 50% respectively over the past 24 hours. This trading activity is irregular as ordinarily the trading volume of Bitcoin and ether would account for the vast bulk of trading on the three leading Korean exchanges.Speculative interestXRP has under-performed in recent years and at the heart of its difficulties has been a multi-year legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States. In its complaint, the SEC has claimed that XRP is an unregistered security. Speculation in recent weeks suggests that this highly litigated battle may be drawing to a conclusion. Many commentators have suggested that either a deal will be struck or the court could soon decide to rule on the matter.During the 2017 bull market, the token reached the heady heights of a $3.40 unit price. That’s a target that the cryptocurrency has never been able to reach ever since. During the last bull market, it rose to around $1.76 for a short time in April 2021. There’s little doubt but the regulatory cloud hanging over it has suppressed the price. Much depends on the outcome of this lawsuit, not just for XRP but for crypto as a whole.Another notion driving speculative interest is the idea that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may classify XRP as a commodity. That line of thought is more recent and follows the CFTC classifying a number of cryptocurrencies as commodities in its lawsuit against global crypto exchange Binance. In follow up comments earlier this week, CFTC Chair Roistin Behnam reiterated the claim.The very fact that the CFTC has made this claim is significant in terms of the case being pursued by the SEC, potentially weakening the SECs case. Lawyers for Ripple have made the court aware of the CFTCs claims.Crypto moving forwardCrypto traders in South Korea have been notorious in the past for pursuing speculative trends within the industry with the Kimchi Premium on Bitcoin back in the day as a stand out example. Whether speculative or not, the outcome for XRP, Ripple and the broader cryptocurrency space relative to the cryptocurrency’s regulatory status will be significant.A positive result will not just be a fillip for XRP, Ripple and Asian and other crypto traders who have speculated on such an outcome. It will also serve to provide a level of regulatory protection for all other crypto projects within the United States. A negative outcome to the lawsuit will not be ideal for XRP, Ripple and US-based crypto projects. However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has said in the past that if innovation is driven overseas, Ripple will focus on developing its product overseas.In an interview this week Ripple President Monica Long suggested that over and above the lawsuit, crypto innovation is generally being pushed outside of the United States. Long cites Asia as taking the lead on “thoughtful crypto policy”. On that basis, it’s likely that one way or another crypto moves forward and maybe South Korean speculators will be proven right regardless of the outcome of the XRP..

HashKey Gears Up to Offer Trading Service to Retail TradersHashKey is gearing up to launch its services to retail traders in Hong Kong with the intention of offering them Bitcoin and Ether trading products initially.The Hong Kong-based digital asset management platform received full licensing approval from the local regulator, the Securities Futures Commission (SFC), earlier this month. It’s anticipated that the platform will launch to retail on August 28.That’s according to a report from a local media source earlier this week. Financial publication Investing.com stated: “General investors in the period can only trade Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), because these two currencies currently account for most of the trading volume in the market.“It’s worth noting, however, that investors will be subject to a cap, permitted to allocate only up to 30% of their net worth into the realm of cryptocurrencies while utilizing the platform.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashServing retail clientsIt’s a significant milestone for both HashKey and the regulator, given that Hong Kong has been making huge efforts to further the development of digital asset innovation within the Chinese autonomous territory over the course of the past twelve months. Hashkey, alongside brokerage and exchange business OSL (also successful in obtaining a license), has been collaborating with regulators from an early stage in the lead-up to both receiving full licensing.HashKey got to this point by focusing on two pivotal licenses offered by the SFC. The first of these licenses, known as Type 1, paved the way for HashKey to initiate a virtual asset trading platform, aligning seamlessly with the regulatory framework laid out under Hong Kong’s securities laws. The second license, Type 7, empowers the crypto platform to furnish automated trading services to both institutional and retail clientele.Nurturing digital asset innovationHong Kong has maintained a resolute focus on cultivating a crypto-friendly environment within its borders in 2023. Echoing this sentiment, Financial Secretary Paul Chan asserted the government’s and regulatory bodies’ determination to incubate a robust crypto and fintech ecosystem throughout the year.By March, over 80 crypto enterprises signaled their intent to establish a presence in Hong Kong, with several major players in the crypto industry among them. In April, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a call to banks, urging them to extend their services to cryptocurrency companies.Banking remains a difficulty in Hong Kong for crypto businesses despite the HKMA’s efforts. However, in the case of both HashKey and OSL, both are being banked by Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank.In May, the HKMA unveiled a comprehensive licensing framework tailored for crypto platforms, imposing a deadline of June 1 for compliance. As August rolled in, a select few crypto platforms clinched the green light to offer crypto trading services to an eclectic client base encompassing both retail and institutional participants.This regulatory framework, designed to safeguard the interests of investors, is playing a large part in Hong Kong’s recent success in developing the sector. In this particular instance, it will mean that retail traders will be granted access to Bitcoin and Ethereum exclusively. This curtailed selection provides a good starting point for retail trading, and it’s likely that we will see HashKey’s trading offering being extended to cover additional digital assets as soon as local regulators permit it.

Japan Tops Crypto Losses to North Korean HackersHackers affiliated with the North Korean regime have been responsible for the theft of $721 million in digital assets from Japan.That’s the finding of a recent report by UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic. Elliptic had produced the report on behalf of Japanese news media group, Nikkei. It leaves Japan at the top of the table when considering the distribution of digital asset losses suffered due to North Korean hackers on a country by country basis.Photo by FLY:D on UnsplashIncreasing lossesElliptic has the wherewithal to track and identify blockchain-based transfers. As part of its analysis, it grouped by region and by country those businesses that it identified as having cryptocurrency holdings that later were transferred to digital wallets held by the Lazarus Group, the most notorious hacker group connected with the North Korean government. It’s the first such analysis to break down crypto-related hacking losses on a country by country basis.The study included a consideration of both hacking and ransomware attacks. The loss associated with Japanese-based entities represents in excess of 30% of the global recorded loss. This latest analysis follows a recent report submitted to the United Nations which found that North Korea stole more digital assets in 2022 than any other year. That report had been submitted to the 15 members of a North Korea sanctions committee, finding that between $630 million and $1 billion worth of digital assets had been stolen.Lax securityElliptic’s analysis and subsequent report point to lax security being employed within Vietnamese and Japanese cryptocurrency marketplaces. Nikkei referred to an unnamed source who asserts that at least three Japanese cryptocurrency exchanges had been compromised by hackers between 2018 and 2021.One of those instances involved Zaif, a company that lost $51.4 million in 2018 and subsequently shut down operations. Overall, Elliptic estimates a global loss of $2.3 billion to hackers between 2017 and 2022 in digital assets, as suffered by crypto firms. It also estimates such losses suffered in the United States at $497 million, while Hong Kong-based losses have been calculated at $281 million.International responseIn April, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) within the Department of the Treasury in the United States stated that it had sanctioned two Chinese nationals and a Hong Kong British national for allegedly having aided the North Korean government in crypto money laundering activities.On Saturday, a joint statement was issued by the Group of Seven finance ministers and central bank governors, following a meeting in Japan, outlining the “growing threat from illicit activities by state actors.” It’s widely believed that the proceeds of these hacks are contributing towards the funding of North Korea’s missile program and other such activities that threaten stability within the region.The Japan External Trade Organization (JETO) has estimated that the estimated $721 million stolen from Japan amounts to 8.8 times the value of North Korea’s exports in 2021.