FTX Seeks Exclusion of Dubai Unit from Bankruptcy Proceedings

Huobi Falls Foul of Malaysian RegulatorMalaysia’s Securities Commission, the regulator responsible for investor protection and market integrity in the South East Asian country, has closed down the Malaysian operations of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange Huobi.Photo by Zukiman Mohamad on PexelsThe regulator announced the shutdown via a press release published to its website on Monday. The Commission outlined that it has taken action against both the exchange, Huobi Global Limited, and its CEO Leon Li. It cites “operating illegally in Malaysia,” given that it was operating as an unregistered digital asset exchange (DAX) as the rationale for the decision.With the enforcement action has come an order to Huobi from the regulator to “cease circulating, publishing or sending any advertisements, whether in email or on social media platforms, to Malaysian investors, and to stop its operations in the country, including to disable its website and mobile application on several platforms such as Apple Store, Google Play and any other digital application platform.”Compliance concernsThe Securities Commission is putting the onus on the Huobi Global CEO to ensure that this order is complied with. The regulator said that it had concerns about the platform’s compliance with local regulatory requirements. It further outlined that it is an offense in Malaysia to operate a DAX without having completed registration with the Commission as a Recognized Market Operator (RMO) under Section 7 (1) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007.The Malaysian regulator also took the opportunity to warn citizens that they should only seek to trade on platforms that are registered RMOs and that for right now, those that have funds on the Huobi platform should withdraw their assets and cease trading on the platform.Expected newsHuobi doesn’t seem to have made an official statement relative to the Malaysian Security Commission’s decision via its official media channels. However, it did provide the following response to CoinTelegraph on Monday:“In response to recent reports, we would like to clarify that the situation outlined pertains to the previous Huobi entity and former shareholders. This is not associated with the current Huobi platform, which adheres to strict regulatory compliance globally.”Taking that response at face value, the company doesn’t seem to be particularly bothered about the enforcement action. It seems as if Huobi were already prepared for this eventuality, by starting a new corporate entity from scratch.In August 2022, the Malaysian regulator issued Huobi Global with a lesser enforcement action by adding the company to its investor alert list. It chastised the firm for operating without regulatory approval.Malaysia hasn’t been a hotbed of activity where crypto and digital assets have been concerned and certainly doesn’t compare with Asian centers like Hong Kong and Singapore who are actively chasing crypto business. However, in March of last year, the country’s Deputy Minister of Communications and Multimedia, Zahidi Zainul, said that the Southeast Asian country should recognize crypto assets like Bitcoin as legal tender.In 2021, Malaysia’s central bank joined a Bank of International Settlements (BIS)-led trial to explore the proof of concept of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), in order to enhance technical and policy capabilities should there ever be a need to issue one.

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing ConcernsThere have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashPushing for regulatory oversightKang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.Echoes of past crypto platform controversiesThese concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”

Laos Halts Crypto Miners’ Electricity Amid Drought and DebtsLaos, a leading producer and exporter of hydroelectricity, has made the decision to suspend electricity supply to cryptocurrency mining operations within its borders.Photo by Ioana Farcas on UnsplashTackling a perfect stormThe decision comes as a result of a perfect storm of challenges, including a struggle to meet escalating power demands due to drought conditions, impending commitments to export electricity to Thailand, and the mounting debts of cryptocurrency mining companies.In a calculated move in 2021, Laos initiated a public-private pilot program aimed at delving into cryptocurrency mining and trading. The context for this move was China’s sweeping crackdown on mining activities, compelling miners to scout for alternative jurisdictions for their operations.In response, Laos granted authorization to a handful of entities, spanning construction conglomerates and a bank, to partake in the mining and trading of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. This led to a commitment to regulatory collaboration between government ministries, the Bank of Laos, and Electricité du Laos (EDL).Exploiting hydropowerLaos’ abundant and affordable electricity has placed it on the short list of locations for crypto miners to settle in. With an abundance of rivers and waterfalls, hydropower stands as one of the nation’s primary energy sources, offering a renewable source of cost-effective electricity.However, events in 2023 have disrupted that narrative. A persistent drought has hit the country during the first half of the year, which triggered an unprecedented surge in the demand for electricity from sources other than hydro.The dependence on hydropower, constituting 95% of the nation’s energy generation, struggled to keep pace with the demand. As a direct consequence, EDL, a state-owned electricity distributor, announced the cessation of electricity supply to crypto mining operations.The problem has compounded as Laos finds itself committed to exporting substantial quantities of electricity to the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGET), serving as a lifeline for Thailand’s power grid during the forthcoming dry season. This external commitment has, in turn, further strained the local capacity for electricity supply.Another Asian country, Bhutan, has also gotten involved with crypto mining in an effort to exploit its hydropower resources, where 99% of electricity supply comes from hydropower within the kingdom.Unpaid billsAnother dimension to the saga is the growing debt crisis faced by cryptocurrency mining operations. A representative of EDL cited the inability of these mining businesses to settle their accumulating electricity bills as a key factor in the decision for suspension. The Bank of Laos has further escalated matters by deciding to halt loans to cryptocurrency companies in January.Laos has had bold objectives to transform itself into Southeast Asia’s premier exporter of clean electricity. The nation’s topography, featuring mountainous terrain covering 70% of the country, has immense potential for hydropower, with over 26,000 megawatts of installed capacity and ambitious plans to double this figure.Hydroelectric dams like Nam Theun 2 have become conduits for substantial volumes of low-cost electricity, primarily directed towards neighboring Thailand and Vietnam. Meanwhile, projects like the Luang Prabang dam, boasting an installed capacity of 1,460 megawatts, underscore the country’s ambitions to develop hydropower further.Revenues from power exports have become a vital component in Laos’ gross domestic product (GDP), contributing almost 15%, as per a report from October 2022.