Blockchain Solutions Provider Block Odyssey Launches NFT Ticket Service, “MakeDrop”

Fobl Partners with KDAC to Store Part of Customers’ Assets in CustodyKorean non-fiat cryptocurrency trading platform Fobl announced on Tuesday that it has teamed up with Korea Digital Asset Custody (KDAC) to provide enhanced customer protection.©Pexels/Savvas StavrinosKDAC, backed by Shinhan Bank, has been providing virtual asset custody services to businesses seeking safe asset management.Collaboration plans between Fobl and KDACWith the partnership, the two sides will store a portion of Fobl customers’ assets in custody, build a systematic process for custody of projects’ virtual assets and their pre-disclosures, and seek out new business opportunities in the Korean security token market.Fobl’s potential transformation to fiat exchangePreviously, it was reported that Fobl is set to face a comprehensive inspection next week from the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC).This move from the FIU suggests that Fobl may soon become a fiat crypto exchange in the near future, as the financial regulator has announced that it will first inspect non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to allow fiat trading.

Tongli Han, the CEO and CIO of Harvest Global, has expressed openness to the possibility of applying to offer Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to mainland Chinese investors through the Stock Connect program. This consideration is contingent on favorable developments in the next two years. Harvest Global, along with China Asset Management (ChinaAMC) and Bosera HashKey, recently launched Asia's first spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, aligning with Hong Kong's ambition to establish itself as a global cryptocurrency hub. Han's remarks were delivered during the Bitcoin Asia conference in Hong Kong, underscoring the potential for expansion into the mainland Chinese market.Photo by Jimmy Chan on PexelsUncertain regulatory landscape and growth prospectsDespite the introduction of spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong, uncertainty looms over mainland Chinese investors' access to such products through the Stock Connect program. China's regulatory stance towards the cryptocurrency industry remains stringent, with most commercial crypto activities prohibited on the mainland. While there is speculation regarding the potential inclusion of crypto ETFs in the eligible securities list of the Stock Connect program, approval remains uncertain. The debut of Hong Kong's spot crypto ETFs recorded modest trading volumes compared to their U.S. counterparts, signaling a cautious start. However, Han anticipates the potential for growth in the Asia region, envisioning the Hong Kong ETFs to potentially double the size of their U.S. counterparts. Despite differing opinions on growth prospects, market observers highlight challenges such as the relatively small size of the Hong Kong ETF market and restrictions on mainland Chinese investors' participation, underscoring the complexities facing the expansion of crypto ETFs in the region. 

Philippines Regulator Collaborates with US Counterpart to Tackle Crypto FraudThe Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a step towards addressing the escalating issue of crypto scams, seeking assistance from its namesake and international counterpart, the US SEC.The international partnership was announced via a Philippines SEC press release, published last Friday. The collaboration highlights the severity of a growing problem in terms of crypto-related fraud, underscoring the importance of inter-agency cooperation in tackling the issue.Photo by Krisia on PexelsJoint training effortsBoth SECs will engage in joint training sessions. The collaboration also involves cooperation with the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and it has been established under the umbrella of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). Notably, the Philippines SEC has also signed IOSCO’s Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at addressing crypto scams.The motivation behind these collaborative efforts is readily apparent given the scale of the cryptocurrency fraud that has occurred recently in the Philippines. Recent instances have captured the attention of the authorities, emphasizing the urgent need for regulatory action.Drawing on overseas enforcement experienceMost in the crypto sector are not enamored with US SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s stance relative to digital assets. Notwithstanding that, it may be that his assertive approach to enforcement may have a place in the Philippine context, given the extent of the issue of crypto fraud in the Southeast Asian country. For example, Gensler’s call for “more cops on the beat” to police the crypto industry, expressed in a Bloomberg Daybreak Podcast interview in July, resonates with the Philippines’ current predicament.Though Gensler’s remarks have been met with resistance from some quarters within the crypto industry, they may serve as sage advice in a climate where crypto-related crimes proliferate.Philippines SEC Chair Emilio Aquino outlined that the collaborative workshop involving the two securities commissions was aimed towards strengthening the capability of the Philippines’ SEC enforcement personnel in conducting investigations on securities-related crimes like insider trading, market manipulation, off-market fraud, and crypto scams.Aquino stated: “Scammers are becoming more advanced and sophisticated in their techniques as new technologies arise. As such, the SEC must constantly improve its investigation and enforcement capabilities to ensure that we are always one step ahead in preventing scams.”The Philippines, in particular, could benefit from a more robust regulatory presence to combat human trafficking networks and quash scams that tarnish the reputation of the crypto sector. These criminal activities have unfortunately led many to associate cryptocurrencies with fraud.The Philippines SEC Chair added that collaboration with US regulators and other enforcement agencies would likely guide the country in its pursuit of initiatives that lead towards the protection of the investing public.While expert training is essential, bolstering regulatory oversight, as suggested by Gensler, may be the key to mitigating the pervasive problem of crypto-related crime and protecting the integrity of the cryptocurrency sector.