Hong Kong’s Largest Bank in Lackluster Crypto Embrace

Finger Labs Embarks on Web3 Content Distribution Project through NFT Marketplace XclusiveFinger Labs, the blockchain subsidiary of South Korean digital marketing giant FSN, announced today the launch of a Web3 content distribution project through its non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace Xclusive, according to local news outlet Newsis.Photo by GR Stocks on UnsplashBTS-inspired dramaTo make this project a reality, Finger Labs has joined forces with CRB Media in a strategic partnership aimed at enhancing content publishing, promotion, and distribution. Their first collaboration is a drama series called “YOUTH,” which draws inspiration from BTS’ album “The Most Beautiful Moment in Life: Young Forever.” The partnership between the two entities will allow Finger Labs to gain access to CRB Media’s copyrighted content materials and design resources required for effective marketing.NFT marketplaceXclusive, launched as a beta service last year, serves as a secondary market for NFTs and a launch pad for a wide variety of projects, contributing to the expansion of the NFT sector. In preparation for Xclusive’s official introduction, Finger Labs has been diligently working on developing user-friendly functions to fuel the growth of the Web3 ecosystem. The company explained that the Web3 content distribution project represents a major milestone in the expansion of innovative businesses.Sharing revenuesFinger Labs looks forward to addressing issues faced by traditional content distribution platforms, especially in the wake of the rise of over-the-top (OTT) media services. By leveraging blockchain technology, the Web3 content distribution system will introduce decentralization, enabling network participants to claim their share of revenues. The system will pave the way for decentralized content consumption practices like trading or lending of video access rights, which will be unveiled when the first content YOUTH goes live.Kim Dong-hoon, CEO of Finger Labs, emphasized that the surge in popularity of OTT platforms has presented challenges for content distributors. In response, Finger Labs aims to utilize new technologies to reshape content distribution, nurturing a new cultural landscape. Kim expressed excitement over their first collaboration, YOUTH, whose global recognition will provide momentum to the company’s initiative.

Abu Dhabi’s Venom Ventures Fund faces market challengesA report by The Block on Friday suggests that Abu Dhabi’s ambitious Venom Ventures Fund, heralded earlier this year with promises of $1 billion investment in Web3 startups, is facing challenges in following through on its mission.Photo by Nazar Skalatsky on UnsplashWhat is Venom?Venom is a collaboration between the Venom Foundation and Iceberg Capital, an alternative asset management company also based in Abu Dhabi. The venture was conceived by Peter Knez, former Co-Chief Investment Officer of BlackRock’s fixed income division and Mustafa Kheriba, Iceberg’s Executive Chairman.In a tweet thread published back in August, the firm described the fund as “old money meets new, the perfect platform for leading the next iteration of blockchain development.” The fund outlined that its approach incorporated venture capital, the offering of a project incubator and a specialist advisory service.Knez has set out lofty ambitions for the fund, stating:“The vision is to drive billions of users into our layer one Blockchain technology by being institutional quality and regulated, and by being such we can actually partner with the government and institutions to help them develop framework for stable coins, for cross-border payment system for tokenization of real world assets and thereby help web2 businesses and citizens move to web3.”At the time of its announcement, Venom Ventures boasted a $20 million investment in Nümi Metaverse and a $5 million strategic investment in Layer 1 blockchain Everscale.Unexpected silenceFurther details on deals struck since January have been scarce, although the fund was reported back in August to have been involved in a blockchain-based carbon credits project, backed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (MOCCAE).According to The Block, there has been an unexpected silence from the venture as its first year in business comes to a close, despite the initial buzz in the crypto community that greeted the launch of the fund.Venom Ventures positioned itself to cover the entire venture spectrum, from seed to late-stage investments, even offering grants ranging from $25,000 to $200,000. However, a closer look reveals a stark contrast between the fund’s ambitious promises and its current progress. The fund’s website lacks a portfolio section, displaying only a “coming soon” notice.Blockchain mainnet yet to launchThe venture fund has yet to launch its Venom blockchain mainnet, according to Christopher Louis Tsu, CEO of the Venom Foundation. The lack of updates and communication has raised concerns among industry observers about the fund’s overall progress and its ability to fulfill its investment commitments.The broader context of the crypto market adds to the challenges faced by Venom Ventures. Q4 2023 is expected to see a significant drop in venture funding for Web3, down to approximately $2.7 billion from the peak of $13.5 billion in Q1 2022. Market events have left VCs cautious, with notable instances of significant investments being marked down to zero.Amidst these challenges, crypto startups have turned to the Middle East for capital. However, some industry insiders caution that the perceived ease of accessing capital in the Middle East might be a mirage. With that, it remains to be seen whether the fund can revive its initial momentum and deliver on its promise to fuel the growth of Web3 startups in the ever-evolving crypto landscape.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.