Research Finds Over 90% of Korean Cryptos Prone to Pump-and-Dump Schemes

Local crypto firms in Hong Kong are understood to be in “active” talks with the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), with a view towards bringing about the integration of staking within crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) products. Haiyang Ru, chief risk officer of HashKey Group, a leading Hong Kong-headquartered digital asset financial services firm, told The Block that the Chinese autonomous territory may shortly see the introduction of staking services relative to crypto derivatives trading products and crypto ETFs. He stated: "We are actively discussing with the SFC the introduction of ETF staking and tokenized money market funds, as well as launching an 'Earn' feature alongside spot trading."Photo by tommao wang on UnsplashFocus on staking in 2025HashKey is one of a number of well-known digital asset firms that is in regular contact with the regulator. Other firms are also paying attention to developments. Alessio Quaglini, co-founder and CEO of Hex Trust, a Hong Kong-based firm that offers regulated institutional digital asset custody and staking services, believes that staking will garner greater attention in 2025. He stated: “Institutions that move into crypto custody will naturally seek yield-generating opportunities for their clients."  OSL, one of the first entities alongside HashKey to be awarded digital assets-related licensing in Hong Kong, has also identified rising customer demand for yield-generating products in the crypto space within the Chinese autonomous territory.  Global competitionThe authorities in Hong Kong are likely to be watching developments overseas also. ETH ETFs in the United States have reeled in $3 billion in capital inflows without staking. Since the launch of these products, many industry commentators have suggested that in the event that staking is approved, big institutions, particularly pension funds and wealth managers, are going to be attracted to the passive yields on these ETFs.  Traditional finance (TradFi) loves yield, and in the case of Ether ETFs that include staking, an annual percentage yield (APY) of up to 5% should be possible. Last month, an S&P Global report suggested that there was growing interest from institutional investors with regard to crypto staking opportunities.  Cryptocurrency ETF issuer 21Shares has applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. to include staking within its ETH ETF product. A similar application has been made by crypto asset manager Grayscale relative to its ETH ETF offering. With that activity ongoing in the U.S. and inter-jurisdictional competition in terms of digital asset growth opportunities, it’s likely that Hong Kong will be keen to enable this market offering. Staking ‘unparalleled’ in TradFi markets Earlier this week, the SFC introduced a new roadmap geared towards strengthening the digital assets sector in Hong Kong. One of the initiatives itemized is the enabling of crypto staking.  The explanatory document published by the regulator states that it is examining the introduction of staking with safeguards in respect to digital asset custody, liquidity risks and “ensuring that the operational processes for staking are transparent.” The SFC described crypto staking as a yield generation opportunity that is unparalleled in TradFi markets.

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNXMark Lamb, the co-founder of failed crypto derivatives and yield platform CoinFLEX, has asserted that creditors of the company cannot interfere with OPNX, a Seychelles-incorporated company that Lamb has co-founded with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the founders of failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashFallout following writIt emerged in October that a group of CoinFLEX creditors had filed a writ of summons in the High Court of Hong Kong, claiming that OPNX, a new crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform linked to CoinFLEX, was established using CoinFLEX assets without their consent. While incorporated in the Seychelles, CoinFLEX ran its operations from Hong Kong.The writ alleges that Mark Lamb misappropriated assets, diverted clients and business opportunities and engaged in actions harmful to creditors during his tenure.The creditors argue that Lamb, while serving as CoinFLEX’s CEO, simultaneously devoted time and effort to setting up OPNX, contrary to his responsibilities. The allegations include diverting assets, falsely representing OPNX’s association with CoinFLEX creditors, disclosing confidential trade secrets and soliciting employees to move to OPNX.The legal action — filed by two companies, Liquidity Technologies and Liquidity Technologies Software — claims that OPNX’s formation was unauthorized and harmful to CoinFLEX creditors. Despite CoinFLEX’s terms of service requiring dispute resolution through arbitration in Hong Kong, the allegations have not been proven in the High Court of Hong Kong.Lamb addresses ‘Twitter FUD’In response to these creditor actions, earlier this week, Lamb took to X (formerly Twitter) to address what he termed as “Twitter FUD.” Lamb wrote:“The Hong Kong court ruled that the few CoinFLEX creditors behind recent ‘FUD’ must not disrupt or interfere with OPNX in any way — and their legal counsel has subsequently stopped representing them.”Lamb added that he hoped that CoinFLEX’s 4,800 creditors would choose the path that he has proposed on the basis that it “maximizes value.”OPNX has defended its position, emphasizing that it provided an opportunity for creditors to sell their claims on the exchange for quick cash, benefiting them. Davies and Zhu have pledged to donate their share of the profit to 3AC creditors.In February, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, announced the rebranding of CoinFLEX to Open Exchange (OPNX). However, the writ of summons claims that OPNX is a separate entity not authorized by CoinFLEX creditors. Leslie Lamb followed up in April by claiming backing from well-known entities in crypto venture capital, only for many of those mentioned to immediately refute such claims.The dispute has also implicated Roger Ver, a well-known character in the crypto space otherwise referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver, a significant individual customer, was accused of defaulting by CoinFLEX. Ver denied defaulting and claimed that CoinFLEX used his trading positions against him, leading to a court-ordered arbitration.OPNX, since its launch in April, has obtained a Lithuanian license for spot trading in the EU and currently processes substantial daily trading volumes. Criminal and civil proceedings against OPNX co-founders Davies and Zhu are ongoing. The situation remains fluid as the legal dispute unfolds.

Oman’s Regulator Invites Feedback on Virtual Asset FrameworkProgressing toward the establishment of its own virtual asset regulations, the Sultanate of Oman is embarking on a significant step by soliciting public feedback on its comprehensive framework.The framework, which governs digital assets, is being developed by the Capital Market Authority (CMA) of Oman. The move reflects the country’s commitment to creating a robust regulatory environment for the virtual asset sector.The CMA’s consultation paper, released last week, outlines the agency’s objectives in crafting this regulatory framework. It aims to provide a viable financing and investment avenue for issuers and investors while also addressing the inherent risks associated with the virtual asset class. Central to this initiative is the integration of business requirements and measures to prevent market abuse.Photo by Niklas Weiss on Unsplash26 key questionsAt the heart of this regulatory endeavor are 26 crucial questions presented to industry stakeholders. Their valuable input will help shape the framework’s core components. These include provisions related to regulatory standards and licensing prerequisites for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), corporate governance, risk management, and the issuance of virtual assets.The proposed framework, as disclosed in the consultation paper, encompasses a spectrum of digital assets. This spans utility tokens, security tokens, fiat-backed and asset-backed stablecoins, and other currencies adhering to the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) definition of virtual assets. However, a noteworthy proposal that has garnered attention is the potential prohibition of privacy coins issuance, a decision pending public feedback.Aiming to reinforce accountability and stability, the CMA may mandate that VASPs establish a local presence in Oman through legally recognized entities and physical offices. Additionally, minimum capital requirements could be imposed on these entities. The envisaged framework may also stipulate that virtual asset firms maintain a low percentage of assets in hot wallets, conduct audits of safeguarded assets, and provide evidence of reserves.Shaping regulation through feedbackWith the consultation phase set to conclude on August 17, the public’s valuable feedback will shape the direction of Oman’s virtual asset regulations. The most salient viewpoints may find their place on the CMA’s official website. Following this consultation period, the CMA will proceed to finalize the regulatory framework.Although the public announcement regarding the launch of a regulatory framework was made on February 14, Oman’s journey toward regulating the virtual asset industry began well before. In November 2020, the National Committee for Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing initiated discussions on forming a task force.Comprising officials from the CMA and the Central Bank of Oman, the task force explored whether to permit or prohibit virtual asset activities. Subsequently, in December 2022, consultants were engaged to facilitate the establishment of this new regulatory landscape.The United Arab Emirates, and in particular, the individual emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, have led the way in the Middle East in progressing a workable framework for the digital asset industry. Oman’s proactive approach is following the example set by its regional peer.Shaping its virtual asset framework underlines its desire to foster innovation while ensuring the integrity of its financial landscape. Its latest effort in seeking public feedback is a positive development that should assist it in arriving at a progressive framework.