WEMIX Play Completes Successful Migration to the WEMIX3.0 Mainnet

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) is moving to close gaps in crypto regulation and support a new bank-led stablecoin pilot, as markets watch for a potential Bank of Japan rate hike. Tougher oversight of crypto lending and IEOsAccording to a CoinPost report, at the fifth meeting of its Digital Asset Working Group held last week, the FSA discussed introducing new requirements to bring crypto lending clearly within the regulatory framework. While firms managing or staking crypto must register as exchanges, some operators have avoided registration by structuring services as borrowing schemes, which are not legally treated as asset management.Photo by Possessed Photography on UnsplashThe FSA flagged that users face both credit and volatility risks, yet operators are not required to segregate customer assets or use cold wallets. Some services offer returns around 10% or tie up funds for several years, with weak risk management and exposure to re-lending defaults and staking slashing. Under the new policy direction, operators will need stronger risk management for re-lending and staking, tighter custody controls, and clearer risk disclosures and advertising. Institutional-only borrowing not offered to the public will remain exempt. Some members questioned whether the new requirements would be practical to implement for off-chain operators, noting that staking is fundamentally on-chain. The group also examined initial exchange offerings (IEOs) lacking financial audits, particularly those aimed at retail investors. Members discussed limits similar to equity crowdfunding: investments over 500,000 yen ($3,000) capped at 5% of annual income or net assets, up to 2 million yen ($13,000). Most past domestic IEOs were under 500,000 yen ($3,200). Some warned such caps could be bypassed through secondary trading, where tokens are immediately tradable. Major banks pilot stablecoinAlongside stricter rules, the FSA will support a stablecoin pilot led by MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, and Mizuho Bank. CoinDesk Japan noted the project, the first under the Payment Innovation Project, will include three additional participants. Mitsubishi Corporation will oversee operations, while Progmat and Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking will handle issuance and custody. The pilot, launching this month with implementation targeted within the year, will test whether a joint stablecoin by major banks can navigate regulatory and operational challenges. Rate hike speculation mountsJapan’s calibrated digital asset push comes as speculation grows over a possible Bank of Japan (BOJ) rate hike next month. Minutes from the BOJ’s October meeting, cited by South Korean outlet Edaily, show one board member saying most conditions for a hike have been met and that financial conditions would stay easy even after an increase. The BOJ kept its rate at 0.5% at that meeting. A rate hike was described as likely if firms are seen committing to wage increases ahead of next spring’s labor talks and if no major global shocks emerge. Markets, however, remain cautious, citing uncertainty over U.S. tariff effects and whether newly elected Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi will endorse such a hawkish stance. 

Korea's Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to re-request the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for an authoritative interpretation of spot Bitcoin ETFs in June, seeking the legal interpretation of such products, according to The Korea Economic Daily.  The FSC currently does not classify virtual assets as financial investment products, as they do not function as underlying assets for ETFs as stipulated by the Capital Market Act. Thus, the issuance and listing of spot cryptocurrency ETFs have not been permitted in the country, limiting trading opportunities for Korean investors. Photo by Pixabay on PexelsDespite the situation, interest around the spot Bitcoin ETFs has surged in South Korea following the approval of such ETFs in the United States and recently in Hong Kong. This heightened expectation of spot Bitcoin ETF approval has coincided with the 22nd general election held on April 10.  DPK’s attempts to keep its promise The DPK’s decision to seek clarification on spot Bitcoin ETFs from the financial regulator comes after the party’s landslide win at the general election, securing a total of 175 seats out of 300 in the National Assembly. Among the party’s key pledges were to allow the trade of spot BTC ETFs and ease regulations on crypto products.  In the run-up to the election, the DPK and the ruling People Power Party (PPP) vied for introducing pro-crypto pledges to win votes from young Koreans in their 20s and 30s, who make up a significant portion of crypto investors within the country.  Bold move to amend Capital Market ActThe spokesperson of the DPK said the party will first seek an authoritative interpretation regarding spot Bitcoin ETFs from the FSC and continue to closely monitor how the situation unfolds. The prevailing view from experts, however, is that the agency is likely to remain sturdy in its view.  If the FSC insists on its current stance on spot BTC ETFs, the party would go as far as to amend the Capital Market Act, the spokesperson said, which would take at least a number of months to follow all due processes.