Hang Seng Ponders Crypto Product Offering

Recent reports from local media outlets indicate that Indonesian authorities have conducted raids on crypto mining sites, accusing them of illicitly siphoning electricity from the utility poles of the state-owned electricity company. The government’s intervention comes as part of a broader effort to address energy theft and regulate the cryptocurrency mining industry in the country.Photo by Fré Sonneveld on UnsplashTen mining sites raidedOfficials from the state-owned electricity company PLN highlighted the importance of coordinated efforts in exposing the unauthorized mining operations that were tapping into the national grid without approval. According to the reports, the ten illegal bitcoin mining sites which were raided incurred a financial loss of approximately 1.4 billion Indonesian rupees, equivalent to $100,000 for the state. The impact of energy theft extended beyond financial concerns, raising environmental and community-related concerns. Local students, alarmed by the potential consequences, urged PLN and regional police to investigate the mining operations. Subsequent action revealed that the theft was indeed taking place, prompting PLN officers from the Bukit Barisan Customer Service Implementation Unit (UP3) to conduct a raid. However, the officers faced threats and resistance, leading to a close coordination between PLN and the North Sumatra Regional Police. The raid uncovered a total of 1,300 bitcoin mining machines engaged in illegal operations, with each machine consuming a substantial 1,800 watts of electricity. Inspector General Agung Effendi, the North Sumatra Police Chief, disclosed that the illicit activities had been ongoing for an estimated six months, resulting in the arrest of 26 individuals across the ten locations.PLN reassured stakeholders of continued collaboration with the police to prevent further electricity theft and safeguard the national grid from such unauthorized activities. Worldwide concernThe incident in Indonesia reflects a global concern over the energy consumption of cryptocurrency mining operations generally, but also with regard to illegal activity. In recent years, the environmental impact of these operations has become a focal point in public policy debates, with climate activists emphasizing the harm caused. Government officials, on the other hand, express concerns about the potential disruption to the total distribution network if not properly regulated. In September, neighboring Malaysia identified illegal crypto mining activities in the state of Sarawak as the reason for recurrent power disruption. Meanwhile, in Singapore in August, authorities uncovered a crypto mining scam that cheated investors out of $1.3 million dollars. Indonesia joins other countries that have conducted raids on crypto mining operations accused of running large-scale, unregistered facilities. Malaysia has witnessed multiple arrests related to digital asset mines, while in Venezuela, authorities seized bitcoin machines and weapons from a recaptured prison controlled by a criminal gang. Legitimate mining potentialNotably, this marks the first such incident in Indonesia, and energy theft charges in the country are punishable by up to five years in prison or 200% of the stolen energy’s value. Despite these problems, Indonesia also understands the opportunity that exists where legal bitcoin mining is carried out. In May, Ridwan Kamil, Governor of the province of West Java, participated in a fireside chat titled “The Indonesia Bitcoin Mining Campaign.” During that event, Governor Kamil recognized the potential that bitcoin mining offers Indonesia. He stated: “[Indonesia has] the second most geothermal potential in the world — more than 800 rivers with hydropower. As bitcoin allows the transformation of energy into money, bitcoin could be transformative for Indonesia.” The global trend of addressing energy consumption in crypto mining is evident in Kazakhstan, where regulators seek to limit miners’ access to the national grid unless they operate solar-powered mines. Indonesia, with its pro-crypto population, is also moving towards increased regulation, mandating all crypto exchanges to register with the Commodity Futures Exchange (CFX) to continue operations beyond August 2024.  

Funding Round Sees HashKey Target Unicorn ValuationLeading financial technology company, Hong Kong-based HashKey Group, is looking to raise between $100 million and $200 million based on a $1 billion dollar company valuation that sees it take on unicorn status.According to an initial report by Bloomberg, early stage talks on the fund raise are progressing positively. It cites sources familiar with the matter in suggesting that as the fund raise negotiations progress, the terms of the offering, extent of the capital raise, and the valuation upon which its all based could change.Photo by Annie Spratt on UnsplashLeveraging a crypto-friendly environmentThe Web3 infrastructure developer and digital asset management firm has decided to take advantage of favorable conditions in Hong Kong in order to raise capital. The current business backdrop in the Chinese autonomous territory is particularly positive, and something that’s likely to make the capital raise a much easier task.Hong Kong has sought to create a crypto-friendly environment by way of both word and deed over the course of the past six months. With that being the case, it’s logical that there is tremendous opportunity for businesses like HashKey to achieve rapid growth in the nascent digital assets sector.Under the supervision of the Hong Kong regulator, Hashkey has already started to offer its services, one of only two companies (alongside OSL) to be permitted to trade in advance of the full implementation of licensing next month.While there have been some difficulties relative to banking the digital assets sector in Hong Kong, ZA Bank, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, has stepped up with the aspiration of banking the sector. ZA Bank is expected to facilitate crypto-fiat conversions with both of the currently licensed exchanges, HashKey and OSL, where customers can swap crypto into fiat currencies. The bank will also offer basic banking services to local web3 startups, a category that is currently underserved by traditional financial institutions.HashKey itself is cognizant of the conditions being right on the ground in Hong Kong and the opportunity that presents. Its chairman, Xiao Feng stated that Hong Kong is “very serious about building an international virtual asset center,” when speaking at the city’s Web3 Festival recently, an event that drew 13,000 attendees on its first day.Diversified service offeringThe firm’s activities in Hong Kong extend to HashKey Pro, a Hong Kong-compliant virtual asset exchange, and HashKey Capital, an investment firm. In April, the company established HashKey Wealth.This wealth management service offers investors access to a wide range of digital assets, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies, together with alternative investments such as decentralized finance (DeFi) projects and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The program is designed to meet the needs of both institutional and high net worth individual investors. The investment strategies offered vary, ranging from passive to actively managed portfolios. Different risk profiles are employed to suit investors’ preferences. The program also provides a range of other services, including custody, trading, and portfolio rebalancing, to ensure that investors can manage their investments with ease.

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.