Korbit and SK Planet Team Up to Promote NFT Membership Program

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.

Crypto.com’s Dubai-based subsidiary secures crypto licenseCRO DAX Middle East, the Dubai-based subsidiary of Singapore-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange platform Crypto.com, has achieved a significant milestone by obtaining a license from the emirate’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) to provide specified virtual asset services.Photo by Timo Volz on UnsplashExpanding product offering in DubaiThe approval, announced by the firm via a press release published to its website on Tuesday, marks a pivotal moment for the Singapore-based Crypto.com, allowing it to offer regulated virtual asset services in Dubai, including exchange services, broker-dealer services, management and investment services as well as lending and borrowing services.The virtual assets service provider (VASP) license is contingent upon CRO DAX Middle East meeting specific conditions and localization requirements outlined by VARA. Once these conditions are satisfied and the operational approval notice is received from the regulator, the company will be poised to commence operations. These services will be made accessible to both retail and institutional users through Crypto.com’s app and exchange platform.Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto.com, expressed his enthusiasm for Dubai’s regulatory approach, stating: “Dubai continues to show it is a leading market when designing effective regulation for the crypto space while still supporting adoption and innovation.”Dubai’s virtual asset sector developmentThe regulatory framework for virtual assets in Dubai was established under the Dubai Virtual Asset Regulation Law in March 2022, leading to the creation of VARA. Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Vice President and Ruler of Dubai, founded VARA with the aim of developing an advanced legal framework to safeguard investors. Furthermore, the objective was to set international standards for the governance of the virtual asset industry, while fostering responsible business growth.VARA issued regulations in February to provide clarity and certainty on the expected level of operator responsibility and to mitigate market risks. This move aligns with the broader context of global cryptocurrency regulations, aiming to create a safe environment for investors in the wake of recent collapses of major platforms.Crypto.com is working to become one of the first virtual asset exchanges to implement its VASP license in accordance with VARA’s specialized regulations issued earlier this year. The company had previously received its minimum viable product provisional license in June 2022 and the MVP preparatory license in March of the current year. The operational license, which follows the preparatory and provisional stages, grants virtual asset service providers permission to conduct activities in seven specified categories.Adapting to the marketThe company has also been working on licensing in other markets. In Singapore, where it is headquartered, the company received a Major Payment Institution (MPI) trading license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in June. The company has also re-calibrated its offering based on market shifts. Earlier this year, it halted its institutional exchange service in the United States due to a downturn in institutional demand stateside.In March 2022, Crypto.com declared Dubai as its regional hub for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), solidifying its commitment to expanding its presence and contributing to the growth of the cryptocurrency ecosystem in the region.

SEC Seeks to Question Co-Founder of Singapore’s Terraform LabsThe United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a step forward in its ongoing case against Singapore’s Terraform Labs by seeking to question Daniel Shin, the Co-Founder of the company.The SEC's intention is to gather evidence related to Chai Corporation, a payments company associated with Terraform and the Terra blockchain. District Judge Jed Rakoff granted the SEC’s request earlier this week, which is part of the regulatory body’s efforts to build a case against Terraform Labs and its Co-Founder, Do Kwon. The decision was based upon a motion originally filed in July.Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashRequesting South Korean assistanceThe motion, which was granted on Tuesday, allows the SEC to reach out to South Korea for assistance in questioning Shin and obtaining documents related to Chai Corporation. The regulatory body aims to gain insights into Kwon’s role at Chai, the utilization of the Terra blockchain by Chai, and the disclosures made by Chai regarding its relationship with Terraform.Additionally, the SEC is interested in understanding the reasons behind Chai’s separation from Terraform, as the two companies shared offices and staff until their split in 2020.No opposition filedOn a previous occasion, Kwon unsuccessfully challenged the SEC's attempt to access company records on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction given that Terraform is a Singapore-domiciled company. In June, both Terraform and Kwon attempted unsuccessfully to have the entire action thrown out.On this occasion neither Terraform Labs nor Kwon have opposed the SEC’s motion. In fact, they have even included their own set of questions and document requests. Both the Singaporean firm and its Co-Founder have denied the SEC’s allegations, which were filed earlier this year.The SEC’s lawsuit claims that Terraform’s cryptocurrencies, specifically Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) and Terra ClassicUSD (USTC), were involved in fraudulent activities. The US regulatory body further alleges that Kwon and Terraform falsely promoted the use of the Terra blockchain by Chai for processing and settling transactions.The SEC’s lawsuit also accuses Terraform and Kwon of fabricating transactions involving TerraKRW (KRT), a Korean won-pegged stablecoin, to give the impression that Chai was actively utilizing the Terra blockchain.Collapse falloutTerra, an interconnected crypto ecosystem, faced a collapse in May 2022, resulting in the loss of approximately $40 billion in value and impacting the wider cryptocurrency market. The aftermath of this collapse led to legal actions against individuals associated with Terraform Labs. South Korean prosecutors, for instance, charged Shin with multiple fraud offenses in April, alleging that he had concealed the risks of investing in Terraform’s cryptocurrencies.Kwon’s legal situation is equally complex. He is currently serving a prison sentence in Montenegro for attempting to leave the country using a fake passport. He faces criminal charges in both the United States and South Korea, and both countries have requested his extradition.The ongoing investigation sheds light on the intricate relationships within the Terra ecosystem, having an impact across different jurisdictions. As legal proceedings unfold, the outcome will likely have implications for the regulation and oversight of cryptocurrency and blockchain projects internationally.