South Korea Launches Blockchain Project to Streamline Public Services

Hong Kong unveils comprehensive tokenization regulationsChristopher Hui, Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, shared a roadmap for upcoming regulations within the tokenization sector during his address at the Hong Kong Fintech Week 2023.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashJPEX no hindrance to Web3 growthHui’s announcement at the event on Thursday comes on the heels of the JPEX scandal, a Dubai-based crypto exchange that collapsed amid allegations of having defrauded Hong Kong-based platform users. Hui emphatically stated that the JPEX incident would not deter Hong Kong’s commitment to expanding the Web3 market. Hui stated:“We’ve been asked many times whether JPEX will affect our determination to grow the Web3 market — the answer is a clear ‘no.’”In June, Hong Kong implemented new regulations for cryptocurrency exchanges, opening up locally regulated crypto trading services to retail customers via virtual asset service providers (VASPs). However, the majority of the forthcoming regulatory efforts will extend beyond the crypto sector, focusing on areas such as token issuance, wallets and other related components.Regulatory impact on TradFi and DeFiHui indicated the intention to expand virtual asset regulations, suggesting a potential impact on decentralized finance (DeFi). The planned regulations within the tokenization domain are poised to influence not only the crypto industry but also traditional finance (TradFi).These regulations include the issuance of a circular concerning intermediaries engaging in tokenized securities. Additionally, they entail a circular regarding the tokenization of Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)-authorized investment products. Lastly, they’re inclusive of consultations with banks on digital asset custody services with the involvement of the banking regulator. Furthermore, a joint consultation on stablecoin regulations will be issued by the Treasury and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA).Focus on positive impact of tokenizationEddie Yue, CEO of the HKMA, echoed Hui’s sentiments by discussing the positive impact of tokenization. He anticipates that tokenization will fuel the adoption of blockchain payments, particularly involving stablecoins and tokenized deposits. Yue believes that central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will serve as the foundation and a crucial element for achieving interoperability within this ecosystem.He emphasized the need to tackle crucial questions, such as the legal definitions of tokenized securities and whether Delivery versus Payment (DvP) can be successfully implemented for tokenized securities. Additionally, Yue pointed out the intricate legal considerations and interoperability challenges that are currently being discussed within the central bank community.First tokenized green bond issuanceYue also highlighted Hong Kong’s first-of-its-kind issuance of tokenized green bonds in February and revealed that discussions with the industry are already underway for the next bond.“We, ourselves, assisted the government to issue the world’s first-ever tokenized government green bond earlier this year in order to demonstrate the compatibility of Hong Kong’s legal and regulatory environment with this very new issuance format,” he stated. However, despite the promising outlook, Yue remained grounded on the subject, acknowledging the significant challenges in the tokenization landscape.In a related development, HSBC recently disclosed that it is conducting experiments with tokenized deposits in collaboration with Ant Group as part of the HKMA sandbox.

Wemade to unveil upgraded DAO platform Wepublic in FebruarySouth Korean gaming publisher Wemade’s blockchain-powered social platform Wepublic is scheduled to undergo a revamp this coming February, according to an official press release on Wemade’s website on Monday (KST).Photo by Christin Hume on UnsplashDecentralized empowermentWepublic is a platform that employs decentralized protocols to allow a wide variety of official organizations — from political and religious factions to non-profit organizations — to build and operate decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) based on the transparent sharing of the status of their funds.Through its integration of blockchain technology, Wepublic guarantees the transparency and integrity of all information and records stored on its platform, safeguarding them against counterfeiting and diversion. The platform notably emphasizes the ability of all participants in a DAO to partake in organizational activities and democratic decision-making.Major overhaulThe upcoming second version, Wepublic 2.0, will extend access to individuals and non-official groups. In particular, a new feature called Wepublic Point will be added, which will enable donations and further solidify the platform’s decentralized protocols. The platform will also offer connectivity with social media platforms, boosting accessibility.Wemade stated that it is currently recruiting the first cohort for Wepublic’s support group, Wepublic Supporters, which will be responsible for planning and executing promotional projects on the platform for 12 weeks starting from Jan. 25. College and postgraduate students are eligible to apply until Jan. 13. Those who stand out with their performance will get the opportunity to apply for an internship at Wemade.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.