Binance Weighs Up UAE Expansion Amid Regulatory Pressures

Gate.io Shrugs Off Withdrawal Concerns Amid Multichain CrisisGate.io, a prominent cryptocurrency exchange, has refuted rumors circulating within the crypto community about withdrawal issues on its platform. On Wednesday, the exchange reassured users that its operations remain unaffected by recent events.Photo by Keller Chewning on UnsplashGate.io confirms smooth operationsGate.io is one of the oldest Chinese Bitcoin exchanges. It moved its corporate headquarters to the Cayman Islands once the Chinese authorities took a hardline stance on cryptocurrencies a few years ago. It also maintains offices in Seoul, South Korea, and is currently preparing to launch a bespoke Hong Kong-based platform.According to the exchange, withdrawals are functioning properly, and the overall operations of the exchange are healthy. It explicitly stated, “There are no issues with our operations or withdrawals as rumored.”Multichain concernsSpeculation emerged on social media on May 24 when Arkham Intelligence reported that members of the separate blockchain project Multichain had transferred $3 million worth of the $MULTI token to Gate.io. Arkham also mentioned other transactions involving Multichain-related tokens, some of which were subsequently suspended for deposit on the leading exchange, Binance.While Arkham did not directly suggest any risks to Gate.io itself, the combination of market activity and other events led to rumors. ‘Coinsumption,’ a Twitter account with nearly 31,000 followers, suggested on May 31 that Gate.io might be facing insolvency problems and advised users to withdraw their funds from the exchange.The ongoing issues with Multichain may well be unrelated to Gate.io. Multichain’s team members recently stated that they are unable to contact their CEO or access project servers. The project has experienced transaction delays over the past few days.Native token price impactGate.io’s native token ($GT) has reportedly been affected by these rumors, as its value has declined by 6.59% over the past 24 hours. In contrast, Bitcoin has only experienced a 1.4% decrease.The $GT token losses can be attributed, in part, to a period of several hours during which the token’s price dropped from $4.92 to $4.49. In isolation, this change represents an 8.7% loss, although there have been partial recoveries and other fluctuations to offset the decline. At the time of publication, the $GT token unit price stood at $4.36.Despite the recent challenges, Gate.io continues to demonstrate significant trading volume. On the most recent day, the exchange recorded approximately $525 million in trading volume, solidifying its position as one of the largest centralized exchanges with sub-billion daily trading volumes.The almost ten-year-old exchange is among several cryptocurrency exchanges preparing to comply with upcoming regulations in Hong Kong. It aims to operate alongside other platforms, such as CoinEx, OKX, Huobi, and BitMEX, as they adapt to the regulatory framework being implemented in the region.Gate.io has dispelled rumors of withdrawal issues, assuring users that its operations are functioning normally. Notwithstanding that, as with everything in the crypto space, the facts and circumstances can change in an instant. Therefore, it’s a topic that is worthwhile watching as further news emerges relative to ongoing issues on the Multichain project.

Singapore’s largest bank in terms of assets under management (AUM), DBS Bank, has introduced “DBS Token Services,” an offering it describes as “a new suite of banking services that integrate tokenisation and smart contract-enabled capabilities with its award-winning banking services.” The bank announced details of the new service offering via a press release published on its behalf by PR Newswire on Oct. 18. The product caters towards the needs of DBS Bank’s institutional clients, with the objective of unlocking operational efficiencies and transaction banking capabilities.  The product suite includes DBS Treasury Tokens, conditional payments and programmable rewards, with the latter allowing institutions to program and manage the use of funds. The products run on the bank’s permissioned blockchain, while being Ethereum virtual machine (EVM) compatible.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashRunning on permissioned blockchainThe bank pointed out the implications of operating the service over a permissioned blockchain network, stating:”Using a permissioned blockchain provides DBS full control over these services, enabling the bank to harness the benefits of blockchain technology while adhering to compliance standards.” Permissioned networks utilize distributed ledger technology (DLT) but they don’t truly embrace decentralization. They’ve proven popular with traditional financial services companies who want to still maintain ultimate control over the network. Conditional paymentsThe bank’s new product suite integrates tokenization and smart contract capabilities with existing conventional services. Those smart contracting capabilities make programmability an accessible feature for institutions relative to fund governance.  With that, conditional payments are likely to lead to an improvement in payment workflows for institutions. The bank believes that this aspect of its latest offering builds upon a recent pilot project that DBS engaged in alongside Enterprise Singapore and the Singapore Fintech Association (SFA). That project involved the utilization of blockchain technology, and in particular smart contracting, for the purpose of distributing government grants. DBS Token Services has been integrated with the bank’s core payment engine and various other banking sector payment infrastructures. Treasury Tokens enable institutional clients to settle multi-currency intra-group transactions across multiple markets instantaneously, 24/7. Back in August DBS partnered with digital payments provider Ant International, an affiliate of Chinese conglomerate Alibaba Group, on a pilot project involving blockchain-based treasury and liquidity management using Treasury Tokens. DBS Bank’s Group Head of Global Transaction Services, Lim Soon Chong, claimed that "by leveraging tokenisation and smart contract capabilities, DBS Token Services enables companies and public sector entities to optimise liquidity management, streamline operational workflows, strengthen business resilience, and unlock new opportunities for end-customer or end-user engagement.” Chong added that the new service is a leap forward in transaction banking, demonstrating “how established financial institutions can leverage blockchain technology to deliver new ground-breaking features and experiences.” Embracing blockchainDBS is an outlier in TradFi relative to blockchain and digital assets insofar as it has delved much deeper into the emerging technology by comparison with the majority of its peers. Last month, the company announced that it plans to introduce over-the-counter (OTC) crypto options trading and structured notes for institutional clients during Q4 2024. Earlier in the year, it participated in a proof of concept for FX payment versus payment (PvP) settlement on the blockchain of Singapore-based unified ledger market infrastructure firm Partior.

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship.