Sygnum Bank Achieves In-Principle MPI Licence Approval in Singapore

US Sanctions Chinese for Enabling Crypto Money LaunderingIn a press release published earlier this week, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) within the Department of the Treasury in the United States, stated that it had sanctioned two Chinese nationals and a Hong Kong British national for allegedly having aided the North Korean government in crypto money laundering activities.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsThe Americans claim that the funds are the proceeds of cyber crime with the laundered money in turn being used to support the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) regime, including its ballistic missile and weapons programs.Illicit OTC crypto tradesThe three OFAC-sanctioned individuals are Wu Huihui (Wu), Cheng Hung Man (Cheng) and Sim Hyon Sop (Sim). Wu is an over the counter (OTC) cryptocurrency trader based within China. OFAC claims that he has facilitated the conversion of millions of dollars worth of stolen digital assets into fiat currency at the behest of a North Korean cyber-crime syndicate.In 2009 OFAC sanctioned a small North Korean bank, Korea Kwangson Banking Corp. (KKBC). At the time, the agency claimed that KKBC had extended financial services to previously designated North Korean banks including Tanchon Commercial Bank and Korea Hyoksin Trading Corporation. Fourteen years on, OFAC has now identified Sim as a facilitator of KKBC money laundering schemes. OFAC claims that Sim represented the sanctioned bank, and in the process, he was the recipient of millions of dollars worth of cryptocurrency.Overseas earningsThe agency claims that the source of this money was the earnings of North Korean IT workers who had worked overseas, including within the United States. The North Korean regime has pursued a strategy of sending workers into employment overseas in an effort to raise capital in harder currency.Like Wu, Cheng was also identified as an OTC cryptocurrency trader. It’s understood that Cheng collaborated with Wu, and employed a series of shell companies in order to convert cryptocurrency into fiat money.Blockchain data analysis firm Chainalysis has researched the topic based upon the OFAC and Department of Justice data and information. That analysis has revealed that the North Korean hackers and cyber-crime facilitators make use of cryptocurrency mixers such as Tornado Cash and Sinbad. While other illicit entities utilize these crypto mixers which attempt to obfuscate the origin of digital assets, Chainalysis’ research suggests that the North Korea-affiliated actors use mixers to a far greater extent than others.Reward offeredIt’s understood that the US authorities indicted a fourth person who remains unknown beyond his/her online moniker, “live:jammychen0150.” Properties in the United States connected with the three known individuals have been frozen. The State Department has also outlined its willingness to provide a reward of up to $5 million for any information that leads to the arrest or conviction of Sim. Furthermore, rewards of $500,000 each are being offered relative to the apprehension of two of Sim’s associates, Han Linlin and Qin Gouming.In a statement, Department of Justice Criminal Division Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite Jr. said that “the North Korean operatives have innovated their approach to evading sanctions by exploiting the technological features of virtual assets to facilitate payments and profits, and targeting virtual currency companies for theft.”

Tether Alters ToS in Singapore Restricting USDT RedemptionTether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, USDT, has made substantial revisions to its Terms of Service (ToS), which may have a significant impact on its user base in Singapore.News of the change emerged on Monday, with Dr. Julian Hosp, CEO of Cake Group, the project team behind Singapore-based Cake DeFi, taking to social media and providing a copy of an email from Tether’s Compliance Department, confirming the change. That notification read:”Tether has changed its terms of service to, among other things, restrict its onboarding standards. Corporates controlled by; another entities, directors, shareholders residing in Singapore are no longer permitted to be Tether customers.”In his commentary, Hosp stated that he wouldn’t be in a position to confirm “if redeeming $USDT into $USD is actually possible, due to being in #Singapore.”Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashToS Change in ContextWithin the cryptocurrency ecosystem, eyebrows have been raised regarding the timing of Tether’s ToS change, as it has coincided with a major instance of crypto-related money laundering. Conversely, some argue that the issue could be specific to Cake DeFi. The DeFi protocol had been flagged for enhanced due diligence (EDD), suggesting that the modification in Tether’s ToS might potentially be a result of a partnership issue between the two entities.Stablecoins like USDT play a pivotal role in the digital asset ecosystem, serving as a bridge between the volatile world of cryptocurrencies and the stability of traditional fiat currencies like the US dollar. Any disruption in their usage can trigger a domino effect in the crypto markets.The cryptocurrency sector is grappling with regulatory uncertainties worldwide, and Singapore is no exception. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has been actively reviewing and updating its crypto-related regulations to align with international standards and mitigate risks to financial stability.The precise motive behind Tether’s decision to restrict USDT redemption for specific customers in Singapore remains unclear. Notwithstanding that, Tether’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Paolo Ardoino expressed the view that the matter is being misunderstood. He tweeted:Spreading FUD”Before spreading FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] it would be great if you guys did take a look at webarchive… This is Jan 2022…. And if you open the link below: Last updated: May 12, 2020… Again, take a moment to search and verify information before YOLO [you only live once] posting.”Clearly Ardoino is making the point that the ToS change is consistent with existing compliance policy which has been in place since 2020. Notwithstanding that, in reviewing related records, media outlet Protos found that USDT issuance and redemption after May 2020 demonstrate that the firm continued to do business with Singapore-based entities. The publication cited UQPAY specifically, a Singapore-based payments processor. It was found to have issued USDT between May 14 and May 18 in 2020.

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.