Korea’s Incheon City Takes Steps to Boost Blockchain Startup Growth

Korean Experts Advocate for Global Crypto Info Exchange to Combat Tax EvasionIn a recent event held to discuss the tax regime in South Korea, law professors offered a suggestion to combat tax evasion associated with cryptocurrencies. They proposed the implementation of a global cryptocurrency information exchange system for more effective response measures.Kim Beom-jun, a professor at the University of Seoul Law School, and Kim Seok-hwan, a professor at Kangwon National University Law School, delved into this matter last Friday at the tax administration forum that took place at the Korea Federation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (KBIZ).Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsRising crypto adoptionAccording to their report, the cryptocurrency market is currently facing challenges stemming from the Terra-Luna incident and the broader economic downturn caused by rising interest rates and inflation. However, it’s worth noting that in Korea alone, there are approximately 6.27 million cryptocurrency exchange users, with a collective market capitalization of around KRW 19.4 trillion ($14.6 billion). This suggests that cryptocurrencies continue to integrate into our everyday lives.Crypto tax starting in 2025Starting in 2025, South Korea is set to impose taxes on income from cryptocurrency trading. However, before the tax is put into effect, there is a pressing need for administrative enhancements aimed at preventing tax evasion involving cryptocurrencies. These initiatives encompass the development of crypto-tracking technology and the allocation of sufficient staff and budgets to enable tax authorities to effectively address crypto-related issues.Foreign exchanges and DeFi platformsDuring the forum, experts voiced concerns about the possibility of tax evasion through the use of overseas crypto exchanges and decentralized platforms.Tax specialists pointed out that it’s difficult to expect people to fully meet their tax obligations when they’re trading on international exchanges. They also emphasized the challenges in collecting accurate tax information from crypto users who report transactions in overseas financial accounts.OECD’s initiativeIn August 2022, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) gave the greenlight to the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). This framework aims to standardize the reporting of tax information related to crypto-asset transactions and facilitate the automatic exchange of such information. During the forum, researchers proposed that in the future, if Korea decides to participate in the OECD’s CARF, it should not only establish a cooperative system between virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and regulatory authorities but also revisit and amend pertinent laws.Additionally, presenters at the forum underlined the necessity of obligating taxpayers to furnish essential tax information for effective virtual asset taxation. They also stressed the importance of implementing appropriate sanctions in cases where taxpayers fail to comply with these reporting requirements.Commissioner Kim Chang-ki of the National Tax Service (NTS) stated that the agency is committed to enhancing tax accountability and transparency. He added that the NTS will take strong measures against malicious tax evasion activities, especially those involving online platforms.Furthermore, Commissioner Kim mentioned that the tax agency is boosting its investigative capabilities using scientific methods to combat emerging forms of tax evasion, like those related to virtual assets. He also said the NTS is expanding its international collaboration and devising other measures.

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Southeast Asian nation’s securities regulator, is believed to be considering moving towards approving spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) products.  In an interview with Bloomberg, the Thai SEC’s Secretary-General, Pornanong Budsaratragoon, said that the agency is weighing up whether to allow individual investors and institutions to access spot Bitcoin ETFs. Budsaratragoon stated: “We have to adapt and ensure that our investors have more options in crypto assets with proper protection.”Photo by Photo By: Kaboompics.com on PexelsMoving along with global crypto adoptionJanuary 10 marked the first anniversary of the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. Given that the U.S. is home to the world’s largest capital markets, that decision has had an impact internationally. That reality is borne out by one of Budsaratragoon’s comments. She stated: “Like it or not, we have to move along with more adoption of cryptocurrencies worldwide.” While the SEC Secretary-General’s comment suggests that she feels a compulsion to move forward in line with developments elsewhere, that wasn’t the agency’s position in January 2024 following spot Bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S.  Shortly afterwards, the regulator, alongside its regional counterpart in Singapore, outlined that it had no plans to approve the product in Thailand, stating: "The SEC has been following these developments closely but we do not have a policy to allow spot Bitcoin ETFs to be established in Thailand for the time being.” Initial access to overseas productsIn March of last year, the agency had warmed to the Bitcoin ETF product offering to a greater extent, by approving access to such products listed overseas to high-net-worth individuals and institutions. Off the back of that approval, One Asset Management (ONEAM) launched a fund of funds in June 2024, enabling Thai investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin ETFs which had been publicly listed overseas. Back in October, Nirun Fuwattananukul, CEO of Binance Thailand, stated in an opinion piece published by the Bangkok Post that he felt that the Thai crypto market was moving from retail towards a focus on the institutions. He stated:“By allowing more institutional funds to participate, the SEC is enabling a diverse range of investment strategies and helping digital assets gain broader acceptance in the mainstream.” Fuwattananukul suggested that the local regulator had made some changes on Oct. 9, paving the way for institutional-grade mutual and private funds to invest in crypto products. The approval of locally listed Bitcoin ETF products would broaden investor access to digital assets in Thailand, particularly in relation to institutional investors, which is in line with the thinking of the Binance executive. Earlier this month, Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister, Pichai Chunhavajira, announced that a pilot program was being launched to help foreign tourists pay for goods and services using crypto within the Thai resort city of Phuket.  Meanwhile, former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra expressed a bullish view on crypto in a speech he made in Bangkok last week. Shinawatra called on the country’s institutions to be more open to cryptocurrency, while citing regulatory developments in the U.S. relative to the emerging asset class.

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.