Korea’s Premier Law Firm to Jointly Hold Seminar on Preventing Crypto Exploits

KuCoin Ups Compliance via Mandatory KYCKuCoin, the Seychelles-headquartered global cryptocurrency exchange, has unveiled plans to strengthen its Know Your Customer (KYC) system by introducing mandatory identity checks.In an official announcement on Wednesday, KuCoin stated that this upgrade aims to ensure compliance with global anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Effective from July 15, KuCoin will require all new users to undergo KYC authentication as part of the registration process. Those who fail to complete the KYC process will be unable to access KuCoin’s wide range of products and services, according to the exchange.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashExisting and new usersFurthermore, existing users who registered prior to July 15, 2023, will also be required to complete the KYC process to access certain features on KuCoin. Withdrawals will remain unaffected for these users. However, they will no longer be able to deposit new funds, the announcement outlines.Despite the introduction of mandatory KYC, KuCoin’s existing non-KYC users will still be able to utilize services such as spot trading sell orders, futures trading deleveraging, and margin trading deleveraging. Additionally, other available services for existing non-KYC users include redemptions at KuCoin’s staking and lending hub, KuCoin Earn, and exchange-traded funds’ redemption.Johnny Lyu, the CEO of KuCoin, explained the KYC process, stating: “A complete KYC process requires users to provide their name, identification number, and identification photo, and undergo facial recognition.” Lyu emphasized that KuCoin carefully verifies customer identification and collects the necessary data in compliance with the laws and regulations of applicable jurisdictions.He added: “Typically, we require customer identification information including information on the customer’s name and further identifiers such as a physical address, date of birth, and national ID number.”Risk profile data collectionIn accordance with regulatory requirements, KuCoin also collects additional information regarding a customer’s business and risk profile. This includes details about the nature and volume of trading activity and the origin of virtual funds deposited, according to Lyu.Lyu underscored that KYC has always been a principle adhered to by KuCoin and that identity recognition is an established part of its process. He further highlighted that KuCoin’s KYC policy is designed to align with regulations in applicable jurisdictions, as there is no unified global KYC regulation at present.KuCoin has also made it clear that the exchange does not support the United States KYC requirements based on their current or updated KYC rules. This new mandatory KYC update will impact a significant number of cryptocurrency users globally. As of July 2022, KuCoin reported over 20 million registered accounts on its platform.Leading global exchangeKuCoin is also recognized as one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges in terms of trading volumes. At the time of writing, KuCoin’s daily trading volumes exceed $540 million, with more than 8 million monthly visits, according to data from CoinGecko. For comparison, major United States-based exchange Kraken receives approximately 5 million visits per month, with a daily trading volume of around $380 million.This move by KuCoin follows a trend of increasing KYC policies among cryptocurrency exchanges. In May, Dubai-based Bybit restricted non-KYC users from withdrawing more than 20,000 Tether (USDT) monthly. It has been reported that cybercriminals have taken advantage of KYC requirements, selling hacked and verified crypto accounts on the darknet for as low as $30 as of April 2023.

While many people assumed that Bitcoin hashrate had moved overseas once China implemented a Bitcoin mining ban in 2021, miners within mainland China still dominate the activity. 55% of hashrateThat’s according to a report on X by Ki Young Ju, the founder and CEO of crypto data analytics firm CryptoQuant. Taking to the social media platform on September 23, the CryptoQuant CEO claimed that Chinese mining pools account for 55% of all Bitcoin mining activity.  Since the 2021 ban, an increasing proportion of hashrate has been accounted for elsewhere, including the United States. Ju clarifies that U.S.-based mining pools now account for 40% of Bitcoin hashrate. He added:”U.S. pools primarily cater to institutional miners in America, while Chinese pools support relatively smaller miners in Asia.”Photo by Joshua Sortino on UnsplashShift towards U.S.-based miningWhile the majority of Bitcoin mining is accounted for within China’s borders, Ju acknowledges a growing shift towards U.S.-based mining. Some commentators have speculated that while officially a ban was put in place, in reality the ban presented an opportunity to jettison inefficient mining equipment, selling it on overseas, while maintaining only the most efficient miners within China. Others such as Daniel Batten, an advisor to Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin miner Marathon Digital, went further in suggesting that the reporting of a blanket ban on Bitcoin mining within China was misleading. Instead, he believes that mining was suspended for a time and then rebooted. Taking to X in June, Batten wrote: “Stop referring to it as a ban. It wasn't and it plays into [mainstream media] narratives of Bitcoin mining being unwelcome by nation states.” At the time, rather than Ju’s 55%, Batten estimated that 15% of overall hashrate was accounted for by Chinese miners. Profitability challengesIn the months following the halving of the Bitcoin mining reward, miners have been struggling to maintain profitability. Bitbo data indicates that miner revenue weighed in at $827.56 million in August, representing a 10.5% drop when compared with $927.35 million in July. The situation has raised questions about the ongoing sustainability of securing the Bitcoin network via the current mining model.  Yet despite these adverse conditions, miners have been maintaining the high hashrate level. JPMorgan analysts recently indicated that the Bitcoin hashrate has recovered to pre-halving levels. A report by Decrypt earlier this month claimed that some miners are aggressively purchasing new mining equipment while maintaining significant holdings of Bitcoin rather than selling it off. Alongside what was perceived to be a ban on Bitcoin mining in 2021, China prohibited the trading of cryptocurrencies. Notwithstanding that, it’s thought that many Chinese residents have access to crypto via bank accounts in Hong Kong, connected with global crypto exchanges. Hong Kong is perceived to be China’s sandbox for crypto with many speculating that the current pro-crypto stance taken within the Chinese autonomous territory had been approved by the authorities in mainland China. Whether China will lift its ban on crypto trading remains the subject of ongoing speculation. 

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTsIn recent days, China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, issued a warning alongside some guidelines on non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest office in China charged with the mandate of upholding legal integrity, safeguarding citizens’ rights, and where necessary, conducting criminal investigations. In a statement published on Monday, the agency set out an advisory, together with additional recommendations, pertaining to NFTs.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsNFT status in ChinaWhile all and sundry are aware of a multi-year crack-down by the Chinese authorities on crypto in recent times, exemplified by a ban on crypto trading and the operation of crypto mining facilities within the country’s borders, the status of NFTs has been discussed to a much lesser degree.NFTs remain legal within the country. When the crypto trading ban came into play in 2021, much of the local industry connected with that trading activity disappeared. However, in its place, a newly emergent trend came to the fore in the form of NFTs. With cryptocurrencies perceived as being high risk and sanctioned by the authorities, attention turned to NFTs and there has been a surge of adoption of the digital collectibles within China as a consequence.NFT risksThe procuratorial agency highlighted a number of attributes as well as risks in relation to NFTs in the report that it published. The agency finds the issue of ownership of NFTs as a troublesome one. It cites the fact that NFTs can be replicated and distributed at will on this basis as being particularly problematic. The legitimacy of the right source of the work itself is the decisive factor for the healthy and orderly development of digital works NFT transactions,” it states.It appears that the agency, like many in traditional professional circles before them, have a difficulty recognizing the model of asset ownership that NFTs incorporate. That ownership is not defined by civil law or in accordance with centralized systems but by simply the possession of the requisite private key pertaining to a given NFT within a decentralized system.Blockchain, not cryptoThe agency acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology. This is not surprising as while there might be an ongoing clampdown on decentralized cryptocurrencies in China, officials at a national level and in numerous instances within regional administrations, are demonstrating a strategy of leveraging blockchain technology for the betterment of the Chinese economy in the future.Public prosecutor Wang Xia-fen, one of the authors of the report, stated: “It’s widely recognized that digital collectibles have the potential to protect intellectual property rights, boost content creation and enrich the digital economy.” Wang encouraged public prosecutors to “find the distinction between real innovation and criminal activities” where NFTs are concerned.The upshot of its report though, is that the procuratorial agency is uncomfortable with the similarity of many of the attributes of NFTs when compared with decentralized cryptocurrencies. It issued a warning on that basis, emphasizing a need for risk assessment to be carried out and further consideration of the legal risks that are implicated.