Top

China dominates Bitcoin hashrate despite mining ban

Markets·September 23, 2024, 11:50 PM

While many people assumed that Bitcoin hashrate had moved overseas once China implemented a Bitcoin mining ban in 2021, miners within mainland China still dominate the activity.

 

55% of hashrate

That’s according to a report on X by Ki Young Ju, the founder and CEO of crypto data analytics firm CryptoQuant. Taking to the social media platform on September 23, the CryptoQuant CEO claimed that Chinese mining pools account for 55% of all Bitcoin mining activity. 

 

Since the 2021 ban, an increasing proportion of hashrate has been accounted for elsewhere, including the United States. Ju clarifies that U.S.-based mining pools now account for 40% of Bitcoin hashrate. He added:

”U.S. pools primarily cater to institutional miners in America, while Chinese pools support relatively smaller miners in Asia.”

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/b9e94c19997f3b3d63537bd2d7ee0928.webp
Photo by Joshua Sortino on Unsplash

Shift towards U.S.-based mining

While the majority of Bitcoin mining is accounted for within China’s borders, Ju acknowledges a growing shift towards U.S.-based mining. Some commentators have speculated that while officially a ban was put in place, in reality the ban presented an opportunity to jettison inefficient mining equipment, selling it on overseas, while maintaining only the most efficient miners within China.

 

Others such as Daniel Batten, an advisor to Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin miner Marathon Digital, went further in suggesting that the reporting of a blanket ban on Bitcoin mining within China was misleading. Instead, he believes that mining was suspended for a time and then rebooted.

 

Taking to X in June, Batten wrote:

 

“Stop referring to it as a ban. It wasn't and it plays into [mainstream media] narratives of Bitcoin mining being unwelcome by nation states.”

 

At the time, rather than Ju’s 55%, Batten estimated that 15% of overall hashrate was accounted for by Chinese miners.

 

Profitability challenges

In the months following the halving of the Bitcoin mining reward, miners have been struggling to maintain profitability. Bitbo data indicates that miner revenue weighed in at $827.56 million in August, representing a 10.5% drop when compared with $927.35 million in July. The situation has raised questions about the ongoing sustainability of securing the Bitcoin network via the current mining model. 

 

Yet despite these adverse conditions, miners have been maintaining the high hashrate level. JPMorgan analysts recently indicated that the Bitcoin hashrate has recovered to pre-halving levels. A report by Decrypt earlier this month claimed that some miners are aggressively purchasing new mining equipment while maintaining significant holdings of Bitcoin rather than selling it off.

 

Alongside what was perceived to be a ban on Bitcoin mining in 2021, China prohibited the trading of cryptocurrencies. Notwithstanding that, it’s thought that many Chinese residents have access to crypto via bank accounts in Hong Kong, connected with global crypto exchanges.

 

Hong Kong is perceived to be China’s sandbox for crypto with many speculating that the current pro-crypto stance taken within the Chinese autonomous territory had been approved by the authorities in mainland China. Whether China will lift its ban on crypto trading remains the subject of ongoing speculation.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 14, 2026

South Korea targets stablecoin rules by March, expands CBDC pilots

The South Korean government and the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plan to finalize legislation governing Korean won–pegged stablecoins by March. According to local media outlet DataNews, the two sides will hold a closed-door meeting on Jan. 20 to discuss agenda items related to the proposed Digital Asset Basic Act, widely referred to as the second phase of South Korea’s cryptocurrency legislation. A key sticking point is who should be allowed to issue stablecoins. Financial regulators favor, at least initially, limiting issuance to consortia in which banks hold a majority stake (50% plus one share), citing concerns about financial-market stability. The Democratic Party, however, opposes granting banks majority control. Separately, the draft would require issuers to meet capital-adequacy standards and maintain reserves equal to at least 100% of outstanding stablecoins.Photo by Greg Willson on UnsplashCBDC pilots to streamline public fundsBeyond private stablecoins, the government is also exploring potential public-sector uses for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), including pilot programs that would deploy CBDC-based deposit tokens. As part of a broader digital transformation push, officials aim to use CBDC rails for a significant portion of public funds administration. By June, CBDC-based deposit tokens are set to be used in an electric vehicle charging infrastructure project: buyers of approved chargers would receive tokens to help ensure subsidies go only to eligible purchases and to shorten settlement times. Regulators are also considering steps to expand institutional access to cryptocurrencies. Under one proposal, publicly listed companies would be allowed to invest up to 5% of their equity in digital assets annually. Eligible investments would be limited to the top 20 tokens traded on the country’s five largest exchanges, with the list reviewed every six months. It remains undecided whether stablecoins, including USDT, would be included. Another planned change would permit the trading of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track spot crypto prices. While current law does not recognize digital assets as eligible underlying assets for such products, that is expected to change under the forthcoming legislative revision. Exchanges say caps threaten growthAt the same time, proposed governance changes that could cap controlling stakes at around 15% to 20% have drawn pushback from industry groups. The draft Digital Asset Basic Act would reshape control structures at South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit—which together serve roughly 11 million users. Regulators at the Financial Services Commission (FSC) say the measures are intended to curb concentrated influence by founders and major shareholders, and are considering a framework modeled on rules for alternative trading systems (ATS) under the Capital Markets Act. Yonhap News reported that the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA)—which includes the four exchanges above as well as Gopax—has warned the proposed governance restrictions could slow the growth of South Korea’s crypto industry. The group argued the changes would dilute the accountability of a clear controlling shareholder, particularly regarding custody and management of customers’ digital assets. DAXA urged regulators to adopt a framework aligned with global standards, warning that stricter caps could increase uncertainty for startups and discourage entrepreneurship and investment. Investors pour $2.4B into overseas crypto ETFsThe lack of domestically available spot crypto ETFs has also driven Korean investors to seek exposure overseas. According to the Korea Securities Depository, as cited by Edaily, Korean investors bought a net $2.37 billion of foreign crypto ETFs between Jan. 13, 2025, and Jan. 12, 2026, placing these products among the top 50 overseas securities by net purchases over the period. Those purchases included a mix of spot-linked products, crypto futures–based instruments, and funds tracking companies that hold digital assets on their balance sheets. Several of the most heavily purchased products involved leverage or options-based strategies, including the T-REX 2x Long BMNR Daily Target ETF ($573.1 million) and the YieldMax MSTR Option Income ETF ($493.9 million). Leverage-heavy demand has been a recurring feature of Korean retail trading. In an October report, Bloomberg noted that prospective homebuyers have increasingly turned to crypto in hopes of building capital, fueling appetite for higher-risk altcoins. Such tokens account for more than 80% of trading volume on local exchanges. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 20, 2026

Naver confirms ad takedowns for unregistered crypto platforms as rules are refined

South Korean internet giant Naver has announced that it is monitoring and removing blog posts that promote unregistered virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Pixabay on PexelsUnregistered status makes promotions illegalAccording to Digital Asset, a Naver official said the practice reflects the fact that unregistered VASPs are subject to criminal penalties, meaning advertisements or promotional content related to them could potentially violate the law. This marks the first instance of Naver publicly confirming its stance on advertising for unregistered crypto platforms. The official noted that this measure had already been implemented before the financial regulator issued a press release in December warning of the illegality of such activities. In December, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) said that referral activities promoting unregistered VASPs through blogs and social media constitute an illegal crypto business. The regulatory clarification prompted influencers on platforms such as Telegram and YouTube to discontinue referral promotions related to these exchanges. Google Play to remove unregistered exchangesIn a parallel move, Google has revealed plans to cease support for unregistered crypto exchange apps on its Google Play Store. Google Korea said the decision was made voluntarily to align with its operational policy of complying with regulations in different jurisdictions. As a result, unregistered platforms will be removed from the Korean market in accordance with the FIU's regulatory rules. Beyond marketing restrictions, scrutiny of crypto exchanges is intensifying as the FSC moves to strengthen oversight. The regulator is reportedly devising a rule that would hold platforms liable for hacking incidents under a strict liability framework, meaning liability could be imposed even in the absence of negligence. According to MTN News, the financial authority is considering penalties of up to 10% of a platform’s revenue for such incidents. However, industry participants have argued that the proposed regulation is excessively harsh. One crypto industry source highlighted the disparity, pointing out that the potential 10% fine is more than three times higher than the maximum 3% penalty imposed on traditional fintech companies. Traditional finance eyes stablecoinsAmid this regulatory tightening, the traditional financial sector is positioning itself within the stablecoin segment. Banks are reportedly discussing whether to seek permission to offer yields on stablecoins, provided these fiat-pegged assets are issued by bank-led consortia. Citing industry sources, Electronic Times Internet reported that the Korea Federation of Banks (KFB) recently held a closed-door meeting with member institutions. The agenda focused on a coordinated response to upcoming regulations governing won-backed stablecoins, which form part of the second phase of South Korea’s digital asset legislation. Discussions included a review of the KFB’s ongoing research into won-backed stablecoins, commissioned to McKinsey & Company. The report, currently at its midpoint and scheduled for release in early February, will examine the feasibility of bank-led stablecoin issuance and explore potential use cases. This move is widely seen as an effort by the banking industry to secure customers and liquidity early on, while protecting its competitive advantage as a group of traditional lenders. The push by traditional financial institutions into stablecoin-related sectors is becoming increasingly concrete. According to another MTN News report, Shinhan Securities has formed a strategic partnership with Etherfuse, a tokenization platform that converts real-world assets (RWAs) into digital tokens. The partnership aims to collaborate on the issuance of "stablebonds" backed by government bonds. The planned issuance will use the ticker KTB, with Shinhan Securities acting as a brokerage responsible for securing and managing the underlying assets rather than serving as the issuer. Similarly, Hana Financial Group has established a stablecoin consortium including BNK Financial Group, iM Financial Group, Standard Chartered Bank Korea, and OK Savings Bank. According to local media outlet News1, the participants plan to raise funds to establish a special-purpose company that will later issue a stablecoin.These developments come as financial authorities move to use legislation to restrict early-stage stablecoin issuance to consortia in which banks hold at least a 50% stake plus one share, citing concerns over market stability.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 20, 2023

Non-Fiat Crypto Exchanges in Korea Urge Banks for Real-Name Accounts

Non-Fiat Crypto Exchanges in Korea Urge Banks for Real-Name AccountsThe Virtual Asset Exchange Association (VXA) made an announcement today regarding its recent due diligence request sent to 12 South Korean banks, as reported by local news outlet Digital Today. These banks have not yet entered into contracts to provide real-name deposit and withdrawal accounts to cryptocurrency exchanges.VXA is a group comprised of representatives from ten non-fiat crypto trading platforms in the country. Among its members, eight exchanges–Aprobit, Probit, BTX, Foblgate, GDAC, Flata Exchange, Flybit, and High Block (previously known as Huobi Korea)–participated in the request.Photo by Eduardo Soares on UnsplashPartnerships with banksThe objective of the request is to urge the banks to consider establishing partnerships with competent non-fiat exchanges. The requesters argued that such collaborations would promote fair trading in the market and provide customers with more options. They highlighted the growing presence of the virtual asset trading sector in the capital market.Uneven crypto marketAn official from VXA emphasized the key role played by real-name bank account issuers in creating a healthy environment that addresses the existing monopoly in the Korean crypto market. According to a March report published by the Financial Services Commission, non-fiat crypto trading platforms accounted for only 3 percent of the total Korean crypto market capitalization during the second half of 2022. The remaining 97 percent was attributed to fiat-supporting crypto exchanges.The official further explained that allowing more exchanges to support the trading of the Korean won currency would contribute to shaping a free market while bolstering transparency and investor protection.Legal requirementsEarlier this month, VXA also sought fair due diligence from five Korean banks that have already formed partnerships with fiat-supporting crypto exchanges. In Korea, crypto trading platforms are required by law to obtain real-name accounts from banks in order to provide cash deposit and withdrawal services.

news
Loading