OSL Prepares for Fund Launch Following License Approval

India has once again emerged as the global leader in cryptocurrency adoption for the second consecutive year, according to the latest Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index for 2024. Despite strict regulations, including high taxes and restrictions on foreign exchanges, India continues to see widespread participation in digital assets, showcasing resilience in the country’s growing cryptocurrency ecosystem.Photo by Jovyn Chamb on UnsplashIndia leads in crypto adoptionIndia ranked first out of 151 countries in the 2024 Chainalysis report, maintaining its top position from 2023. Indian investors have continued engaging with both centralized and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms despite regulatory challenges such as the 30% capital gains tax and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on crypto transactions. This activity highlights the country's strong interest in digital assets. India received $143 billion in crypto inflows from July 2023 to June 2024, placing second in the Central and Southern Asia and Oceania (CSAO) region behind Indonesia, which received $157 billion. CSAO as a whole accounted for $750 billion in crypto assets over the same period, making up 16.6% of global crypto activity. Offshore exchange restrictions and workaroundsIn December 2023, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) issued show-cause notices to nine offshore cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, Kraken and KuCoin, for non-compliance with anti-money laundering laws. The FIU also blocked access to these platforms for Indian users. However, many investors found ways to bypass these restrictions, continuing to access these exchanges via pre-downloaded apps. Despite these regulatory hurdles, Binance and KuCoin have since re-entered the Indian market after paying fines and complying with local laws. Binance settled a $2.25 million fine in June 2024, while KuCoin resolved a $41,000 penalty in March 2024. Indonesia’s rapid growth in cryptoIndonesia on the other hand has emerged as the fastest-growing crypto market in the CSAO region, climbing four places to third in the global rankings. The country experienced a nearly 200% year-over-year increase in crypto activity, driven primarily by retail investors seeking alternative investments such as meme coins. Indonesia received $157.1 billion in crypto inflows during the 12-month period, reflecting strong engagement with decentralized finance services. Broader regional trendsSeven of the top 20 countries in Chainalysis’ adoption index come from the CSAO region, including Vietnam, the Philippines and Pakistan. This growth is fueled by investment opportunities and an embrace of digital assets as new financial tools. Countries with lower purchasing power tend to have higher adoption rates, with retail-sized transactions making up a significant portion of activity.India’s resilient crypto marketDespite regulatory challenges, India’s crypto market continues to thrive. The government's strict policies have done little to dampen enthusiasm for digital assets. Chainalysis found that investors remained committed to crypto, even as the country enforces strict tax policies. India’s high adoption rate reflects strong demand and adaptability in the market. Future outlook for India’s crypto ecosystemIndia’s leadership in crypto adoption is expected to continue. The FIU is reviewing applications from more foreign exchanges, with at least two expected to be approved by the end of 2025. As the regulatory landscape evolves, clearer guidelines could encourage further growth and innovation in the digital asset space.

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) has moved recently to address concerns related to peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions while in a separate development, the country’s GameFi community is calling for regulatory change to enable greater liquidity. The two distinct developments both relate to getting the balance right in terms of crypto regulation from the perspectives of regulators and lawmakers and crypto sector entrepreneurs and participants.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashAddressing concernsIt emerged last week that the FSA had proposed a number of measures to safeguard users against “unlawful transactions,” causing alarm that any such moves would inhibit the P2P transactions market. Responding to a query from Cointelegraph, the FSA elaborated that its recommendation does not encompass "transactions from one individual to another." Instead, it aims to bolster measures against illicit money transfers, particularly instances where an individual deposits cash from their bank account into an account belonging to a crypto asset exchange service provider. The regulator clarified that under the new recommendations, banks would intercept suspicious transactions where the sender seeks to alter their name for the purpose of depositing funds into the crypto platform. The FSA outlined that this situation arises where a fraudster convinces an innocent exchange user to effect the name change, so that exchange rules can be circumvented and the fraudster can receive funds from the scam victim. According to the FSA, numerous financial institutions have already implemented these measures, although the agency has not received any reports of specific cases raising concerns regarding crypto asset markets. Notably, the FSA emphasizes that its recommendations are not universally mandated for all financial institutions, with banks expected to devise and implement measures tailored to their specific circumstances. Solving crypto market liquidity issuesWith that clarification, it appears that the measures won’t have the negative impact on P2P crypto markets as many market participants originally feared. Meanwhile, in a distinct development, Japan's blockchain gaming community has approached the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to seek assistance in bolstering liquidity within Japan's crypto asset market. Taking to the X social media platform on Wednesday, Ryo Matsubara, director of Oasys, a GameFi blockchain, outlined that he had visited the LDP's digital society promotion headquarters on behalf of Japanese blockchain gaming projects to raise concerns about stringent regulations impeding liquidity in Japan, which directly impedes the growth of the GameFi ecosystem. Matsubara advocates for regulations that incentivize safe cryptocurrency investment, positing that increased liquidity, marked by a surge in buyers and sellers, could result from such measures. Oasys intends to continue collaborating with the government to enhance Japan's global competitiveness in the Web3 market, with Matsubara expressing confidence in Japan's potential to reclaim its illustrious gaming legacy on Web3. While Japan initially harbored skepticism toward crypto adoption, its stance has softened in recent times. Matsubara acknowledged the positive impact of a recent crypto-related tax reform which was enacted in December. In September 2023, the Japanese government commenced planning to permit startups to raise public funds through crypto asset issuance. That bill was approved last week and now goes forward to the Japanese parliament for further deliberation. These recent developments demonstrate that Japan is navigating regulatory complexities as it seeks to balance innovation with consumer protection in the burgeoning crypto space.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”