OSL Prepares for Fund Launch Following License Approval

Hacking Attempts on Upbit Reach 160,000 in First Half of the YearThere have been approximately 160,000 hacking attempts on Upbit, Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, in the first half of this year alone, according to a report submitted by Upbit’s operator Dunamu to lawmaker Park Sung-joong of the National Assembly’s Science, ICT, Broadcasting, and Communications Committee.“Cryptocurrency hacking incidents are increasing both domestically and internationally, and hacking attacks on exchanges such as Upbit, which have daily trading volumes exceeding KRW 2 trillion, are a serious issue,” Park said.Photo by Clint Patterson on UnsplashAn uptick in hacking attemptsThe data revealed that the number of cyber breach attempts in the first half of the year totaled 159,061–2.17 times higher than the number of attempts in the first half of last year, which stood at 73,249.Hacking attempts on Upbit have been steadily increasing in recent years, from 8,356 in the second half of 2020 to 34,687 and 63,912 in the first and second half of 2021, respectively. In the first half of last year, there were 73,249, and 87,242 in the second half. Notably, the exchange suffered losses of approximately KRW 58 billion (approximately $43 million) from a hacking attack in 2019.Ramping up securitySubsequently, Dunamu has taken action to enhance security by managing over 70% of its assets in cold wallets and operating hot wallets in a distributed structure instead of a singular one. Hot wallets refer to online crypto wallets, whereas cold wallets are crypto wallets that are offline and disconnected from the internet. Hot wallets offer the advantage of direct deposits and withdrawals, but they have weaker security levels — most known exchange hacks have thus occurred through this medium. On the other hand, cold wallets store private keys on offline sources like external hard drives and portable storage devices, making real-time trading difficult but providing better security and stability.“We have taken various preventive measures since the hacking incident in 2019, such as operating hot wallets in a distributed manner. There have not been any successful cyber breaches to date,” Upbit said.Regarding the role of the Ministry of Science and ICT in managing and overseeing crypto hacking incidents, Park pointed out that this still remains ambiguous. “The Ministry should conduct large-scale white-hat hacking tests and security assessments for crypto exchanges that are frequently faced with hacking attempts, as well as for hospitals and subway systems that manage large amounts of personal information,” he said.

HTX experiences $258 million outflow post-hackHTX, the digital-asset trading platform associated with Chinese-born crypto mogul Justin Sun, has witnessed a substantial net outflow of $258 million since resuming operations after a significant security breach.According to Bloomberg, data from DefiLlama indicates that the outflow occurred between the exchange’s restart on Nov. 25 and Dec. 10, signaling unease among some clients following last month’s cyberattack. In November, HTX reported a loss of $30 million in crypto tokens due to the breach, prompting a temporary suspension of withdrawals and deposits.Towards the end of last month, the platform re-enabled withdrawal services for major cryptocurrencies, gradually bringing the exchange back to full service, supporting withdrawal of all digital assets.Photo by Amritanshu Sikdar on UnsplashMultiple hacksJustin Sun is also associated with the Poloniex exchange and the HECO Bridge, a network established by HTX for blockchain transfers. Both Poloniex and HECO fell victim to hacks in November, resulting in the theft of approximately $200 million in crypto. It’s worth noting that hackers had previously stolen $8 million from the HTX platform in September.HTX, which was formerly known as Huobi up until a business rebrand in September, boasts an average trading volume of $1.5 billion in the past 24 hours, securing its position as the fifteenth largest exchange when measured in terms of trading volume.Increased vigilanceIn the wake of several high-profile crypto platform failures in 2022, digital-asset investors are increasingly vigilant about monitoring flows and reserves at virtual currency exchanges. In particular, that trend gained momentum after the FTX platform’s collapse last year due to fraud.November turned out to be the most damaging month this year so far in terms of platform digital asset theft. Exit scams and exploits encountered during the month totaled a staggering $363 million in losses.In October, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) included HTX, alongside KuCoin, on a warning list, due to their promotion of services in the UK, without having obtained the required regulatory approvals.A third of reserves in BitcoinDefiLlama data reveals that Bitcoin constitutes the largest portion of HTX’s reserves, accounting for approximately 33%. Tron’s TRX token, launched by Sun in 2017, represents around 32% of the reserves. HTX’s native exchange coin, HT, makes up 14%, followed by a Sun-backed token named stUSDT at 12%.In August, Travis Kling, Founder of Ikigai Asset Management, had this warning relative to Sun and HTX:”Justin Sun is a criminal. There’s a hole in Huobi, a hole in TUSD and a hole in Tron DeFi. Act accordingly.”TRX, at the center of U.S. fraud allegations against Sun, prompted a March lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing him and his firms of market manipulation to inflate the token’s trading activity. Sun dismissed the suit on the X social media platform back in March, stating that it “lacks merit.” On Sunday, Sun claimed that the Tron blockchain network which he founded had reached a new milestone of 200 million users.Despite security firm BlockSec reporting the recovery of the $8 million stolen in September, hackers still appear to control the $30 million taken last month. The ongoing situation raises concerns about the security measures and resilience of HTX in the face of persistent cyber threats.

North Korea Using DeFi for Money LaunderingThe United States Treasury issued a warning on Thursday where it identifies North Korea as a user of DeFi services for money laundering. According to the Treasury, both North Korea and criminal organizations have been using DeFi platforms to launder dirty money.©Pexels/PixabayWhile DeFi has been praised for its potential to democratize finance and provide greater financial freedom to users, it has also been criticized for its lack of regulatory oversight. According to the Treasury, this lack of oversight has made DeFi platforms an attractive target for money launderers and other criminal organizations.In its warning, the Treasury noted that North Korea has been using DeFi platforms to launder money and evade international sanctions. The country is believed to have developed a sophisticated system for laundering money through cryptocurrency exchanges, and it is now turning its attention to DeFi platforms.Illicit money movementCriminal organizations are also using DeFi services for money laundering, according to the Treasury. These groups are said to be using DeFi platforms to move money around the world, in order to avoid detection and to launder the proceeds of their illicit activities.The use of DeFi for money laundering poses a significant challenge for law enforcement agencies, as these platforms operate outside of the traditional banking system and are often difficult to track. The Treasury has urged DeFi platforms to implement strong anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) policies, in order to prevent their services from being used for criminal activities.The warning from the Treasury comes at a time when DeFi is becoming increasingly popular among investors and users. According to data from DeFi Pulse, the total value locked in DeFi protocols recently surpassed $100 billion, indicating a significant level of interest and investment in the sector.Calls for greater regulationHowever, the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential for DeFi to be used for money laundering and other criminal activities have raised concerns among regulators and policymakers. Some have called for greater regulation of the sector, in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.Despite these concerns, many proponents of DeFi argue that the sector has the potential to transform the financial industry and provide greater financial freedom to users. They point to the benefits of decentralized systems, such as greater transparency, lower fees, and faster transaction times.The use of DeFi for money laundering is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. While regulators and policymakers must work to implement strong AML and KYC policies, users and investors must also take responsibility for ensuring that they are using DeFi platforms in a responsible and legal manner.Ultimately, the future of DeFi will depend on how the sector is able to balance innovation and regulation. While DeFi has the potential to transform the financial industry, it must also be subject to appropriate oversight and accountability in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.By working together, regulators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders can help to ensure that DeFi is used for its intended purpose — to provide greater financial freedom and empowerment to users around the world.