Bank of Korea Conducts Successful CBDC Pilot Test with Financial Institutions

Venture Smart Financial Holdings Ltd. (VSFG), a Hong Kong-based financial services company, is gearing up to initiate an exchange-traded fund (ETF) directly investing in bitcoin in the first quarter of this year.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashThat’s according to a report by Bloomberg on Friday. The move aligns with Hong Kong's strategic efforts to establish itself as a digital asset hub, and with that, the company plans to submit an application to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) for ETF approval. Brian Chan, the group head of investment and product at VSFG, expressed optimism about the potential of this market, setting a goal of achieving $500 million in assets under management by the end of the year. Long-term objectiveWhile the firm has taken the decision to focus on spot crypto ETFs amid a backdrop of spot bitcoin ETF approval in the United States earlier this month, it’s an objective the firm has been working on for some time. In June of last year, crypto media reported that VSFG were planning the launch of such a product. Notwithstanding that intention, the recent launch of several high-profile bitcoin funds in the United States, including offerings from BlackRock and Fidelity Investments, will likely assist the company in getting product approval in Hong Kong. Immediately following U.S. approval, a Hong Kong lawmaker suggested that the Chinese autonomous territory should respond proactively. Johnny Ng outlined that Hong Kong had to respond to secure its global position in developing the digital assets space in Hong Kong. Positive soundingsTowards the end of December, there appeared to be positive soundings on the possibility of spot bitcoin ETF approval in Hong Kong emerging from the local regulator. SFC CEO Julia Leung stated that the regulator was open to the notion of retail participation in spot crypto ETF products. Her comment was followed shortly afterwards by a joint announcement from the SFC alongside the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) that they were prepared to accept applications for such funds. The approval process for such products typically takes weeks to months, following the precedent of traditional ETFs. Hong Kong presently permits futures-based crypto ETFs, with three already listed: CSOP Bitcoin Futures, CSOP Ether Futures and Samsung Bitcoin Futures. However, these funds have a combined asset value of around $50 million. Samsung Asset Management has not ruled out exploring the launch of a spot ETF, while CSOP Asset Management remains silent on the matter. VSFG is one of Hong Kong's first SFC-approved virtual asset managers, offering both traditional and digital wealth management services. Aegis Custody, a digital asset custodian, is in discussions with four asset managers about listing spot crypto products in Hong Kong. The regulatory requirements in the city may lead issuers to impose higher fees compared to the low management levies seen in many new U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs. Although bitcoin experienced substantial growth in anticipation of these U.S. products, it has seen a 10% decline since their trading commenced on Jan. 11. Nevertheless, many industry commentators expect a stronger bitcoin unit price in the medium to long term as a direct consequence of these products. 

Short-Term Crypto Investment Prevails Among Hong Kong’s Retail InvestorsHong Kong’s retail investor interest in virtual assets has experienced a significant surge in recent years, albeit a recent survey suggests that most retail investors take a short-term investment view relative to crypto assets.Photo by Robert Bye on UnsplashIFEC studyThis newfound enthusiasm for virtual assets emerges from a recent study published by the Investor and Financial Education Council (IFEC), a subsidiary of the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Hong Kong’s securities regulator. The survey found that 6% of retail investors in the city had entered the virtual asset market in 2023, as compared to merely 1% in 2019.Conducted from June to July of this year, the study encompassed 1,000 individuals aged between 18 and 69. The survey uncovered a trend toward crypto investing among retail investors who’ve been enticed by the allure of the emerging asset class. Intriguingly, every single one of the digital asset retail investors in the study held cryptocurrencies in their portfolios. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and stablecoins, while still relatively niche, were also present in the portfolios of 6% and 2% of investors, respectively.11% to invest in crypto within 12 monthsAnticipating a further uptick in interest, the IFEC report posits that 11% of those surveyed have intentions to invest in virtual assets or related products within the next 12 months. This indicates that the allure of virtual assets continues to exert its magnetic pull on investors in Hong Kong.Despite the growing interest, a noteworthy finding in the survey is that 75% of retail virtual asset investors admitted to their primary motivation being the pursuit of short-term gains. Simultaneously, 74% of these investors perceived virtual assets as a prevalent investment trend, and 73% cited the fear of missing out on popular investment opportunities as a driving factor. These statistics underscore the need for enhanced investor education within the sphere of virtual assets.Lack of regulatory awarenessAnother interesting aspect of the data which emerged from the survey was the finding that only 47% of all surveyed investors are aware of Hong Kong’s recently introduced virtual asset trading regulations, which came into effect on June 1.An additional facet of this investor behavior study was illuminated by research conducted by the Department of Applied Social Science at Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU). This research, based on data from a separate IFEC report that surveyed 501 people from November to December of last year, revealed that many retail investors in virtual assets exhibited overconfidence in their judgment.These investors were also found to have a proclivity to overemphasize past information, lean heavily on readily available and easily recalled information, and overestimate personal intuition.With that in mind, Eric Chui, Head of PolyU’s Applied Social Science unit, advised virtual asset investors to adopt a more deliberate and rational approach. Chui emphasized the importance of building financial literacy and collecting high-quality market information to make informed investment decisions, while steering clear of irrational investment behavior and biases.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”