Wemade Partners with Katnappe to Bring Arcade Game to Blockchain Platform

The blockchain network underpinning Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, requires an energy volume comparable to the annual consumption of Thailand. According to Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, the protocol utilized roughly 204.44 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity between Nov. 18, 2024, and Nov. 18, 2025.Photo by Fré Sonneveld on UnsplashFiscal losses drive Malaysian oversightAmid these intense energy demands, Malaysia’s primary electricity utility has recorded substantial financial impairments attributed to illicit activities. Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) reported losses totaling 4.57 billion ringgit ($1.1 billion) from illegal crypto-mining operations over a five-year span. In a Nov. 19 report by The Edge Malaysia, the Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation (Petra) disclosed these figures to parliament, specifying that the unauthorized mining occurred at 13,827 locations between 2020 and August of this year. To counter these infractions through regulatory channels, Petra has formed a special committee scheduled to convene before year-end. This body aims to recommend enhancements to the Electricity Supply Act, which currently delineates penalties based on the offender's classification. Domestic violators face fines ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 ringgit ($240 to $12,000), imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Penalties escalate for non-domestic entities, involving fines between 20,000 and one million ringgit ($480 to $240,000) and potential prison terms of up to five years. Despite these provisions regarding electricity theft, a specific legal code regulating the act of crypto mining remains absent, creating a jurisdictional void. International bans and grid reallocationStrategies to curtail electricity usage by crypto miners are becoming evident elsewhere in Southeast Asia as well. Laotian Deputy Energy Minister Chanthaboun Soukaloun told Reuters last month that the nation intends to suspend electricity supplies to crypto miners by early 2026. He cited the sector's minimal economic contribution and low job creation as primary factors. Consequently, the state plans to redirect power to high-priority sectors, including AI data centers, metals processing, and electric-vehicle manufacturing. Parallel restrictions are emerging globally. In October, the government of British Columbia enacted a permanent prohibition on new BC Hydro connections for crypto miners to safeguard the Canadian province’s energy reserves. Officials pointed to the industry’s "disproportionate energy consumption and limited economic benefit" as the rationale for the policy. The debate over thermal innovationConversely, some enterprises are exploring methods to capture thermal output from Bitcoin mining to heat residential and commercial properties. If viable, such repurposing could utilize the considerable thermal byproducts of mining. A K33 Research study cited by CNBC indicates the industry generates roughly 100 TWh of heat annually, a figure sufficient to warm the entirety of Finland. However, industry consensus on the feasibility of these applications remains elusive. Proponents suggest that mining infrastructure could be situated in proximity to heat consumers. Skeptics, however, contend that the reliance on application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips makes this impractical, arguing that the technical difficulty of mining a block renders household participation unfeasible. Despite these differing views, the concept continues to attract attention as a potential avenue for innovation in energy distribution. As jurisdictions like Malaysia and British Columbia tighten regulatory oversight, the cryptocurrency sector faces mounting pressure to address its energy footprint. The divergence between government restrictions and industry-led efficiency proposals underscores the complex relationship between digital asset infrastructure and global energy resources. Given the shifting landscape of policy and technology, the outlook for sustainable large-scale crypto mining remains uncertain, as governments weigh energy demands against economic benefits and the industry searches for more efficient ways to operate.

Tether, the company behind USDT, the popular dollar-backed stablecoin, is seeking to establish a presence in South Korea through remote hiring, according to a report from Maeil Business Newspaper citing industry sources.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashRather than opening a physical office, Tether is looking for a remote employee who will focus on increasing USDT adoption in Korea, exploring business opportunities, building partnerships and navigating the local regulatory landscape. The expansion comes as stablecoins gain significant traction in South Korea. Data provided to lawmaker Min Byeong-dug from the country's five largest cryptocurrency exchanges via the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) shows that dollar-pegged stablecoins accounted for 47% of crypto assets withdrawn from these platforms between January and March. Central bank pushes for regulationMeanwhile, South Korean officials are increasingly focused on regulating the stablecoin sector. Bank of Korea (BOK) Governor Rhee Chang-yong recently called for the swift implementation of stablecoin oversight, warning that they could bypass the country’s financial rules. During a press conference in Italy, Rhee argued that stablecoins pegged to either the Korean won or the U.S. dollar effectively function as alternative currencies and should be examined under existing money transfer laws. Rhee has emphasized that authorities must first determine whether won-backed digital tokens should be permitted at all. Last October, during a national audit, he expressed concerns about stablecoins' dependence on fiat currencies and advocated for implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) instead. These concerns were echoed by Ko Kyeong-cheol, head of BOK's electronic finance team, who recently highlighted at a financial law conference that stablecoins could profoundly impact the central bank's ability to carry out monetary policy, maintain financial stability and oversee payment settlements. Ko emphasized that if South Korea were to permit won-pegged stablecoins, the BOK should be involved early in the approval process to minimize potential risks to its policy objectives. On the regulatory front, Financial Services Commission (FSC) Chairman Kim Byoung-hwan has indicated that discussions on developing a stablecoin regulatory framework are likely to begin in June as part of a broader initiative. Presidential candidates weigh in on stablecoin futureThe issue has also entered the political arena ahead of South Korea's June 3 presidential election. Lee Jae-myung, the Democratic Party of Korea's presidential candidate, has advocated for a market featuring won-based stablecoins. Lee argues that quickly adopting stablecoins would help South Korea keep pace with global trends and prevent capital outflows. His platform includes introducing spot crypto ETFs and reducing digital asset trading fees.  Another candidate, Hong Joon-pyo of the People Power Party, also previously announced plans to explore the issuance of a won-pegged stablecoin before being eliminated in the party's primary election.

Bankruptcy Judge Permits Terraform Labs to Subpoena FTXIn a significant development in the bankruptcy case of defunct crypto exchange FTX, a judge has granted Singapore-based Terraform Labs the authority to subpoena information related to its ongoing case brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashHack allegationsTerraform Labs, the blockchain company that developed the Terra blockchain and failed US dollar stablecoin UST, claims that the failures of its algorithmic stablecoin and governance token were the result of an attack from short-sellers, possibly involving Alameda Research (FTX’s sister company).The order, issued by Judge John Dorsey on Monday, allows Terraform Labs to serve subpoenas to FTX Trading and FTX US, aimed at collecting evidence to support its defense against the SEC’s allegations of fraud. According to court filings, lawyers representing the FTX Debtor have not formally objected to the court order.Terraform Labs’ request for subpoena power stems from its belief that short-sellers connected to FTX entities played a role in the failure of the algorithmic stablecoin and governance token, leading to the collapse of the crypto firm. The ability to obtain information from FTX through the subpoenas could be crucial in bolstering Terraform Labs’ defense against the SEC’s fraud charges.UST collapse falloutThe collapse of the UST stablecoin in 2022 contributed to a major market crash, resulting in a significant drop in the prices of many tokens. As a result, the company filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. The Co-Founder of Terra, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month sentence in a Montenegrin prison for using false travel documents. He may also face extradition to the United States or South Korea on fraud charges related to Terraform Labs.Motion to dismiss deniedIn a separate high-stakes ruling, US District Judge Jed Rakoff denied Terraform Labs’ motion to dismiss the securities fraud lawsuit filed by the SEC. The judge’s decision allows the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon to proceed, rejecting defense arguments that the agency lacked jurisdiction and that Terraform’s TerraUSD stablecoin did not qualify as an unregistered security.Judge Rakoff’s ruling is a significant victory for the SEC as it intensifies its enforcement actions against crypto companies involved in allegedly unlawful token sales. He found the collapse of TerraUSD, which lost its dollar peg and incurred a $40 billion loss last year, plausible as a reason to consider the token as a security that should have been registered.Moreover, Rakoff dismissed Terraform’s claim that the SEC lacked the authority to regulate stablecoins without explicit Congressional authorization, asserting that the crypto industry was significant enough to warrant application of the “Major Questions Doctrine.” This doctrine limits agency overreach into major political issues but does not apply to the crypto asset markets.The judge also rebuffed Terraform Labs’ attempts to draw parallels between the Ripple case and its own. In the Ripple case, a different judge ruled that Ripple’s XRP token sales to retail investors did not violate securities laws due to the manner of purchase on secondary markets. Rakoff firmly stated that such distinctions did not apply under the legal Howey test governing whether crypto assets qualify as securities.