VCs Say US Crypto Crackdown Opportunity for Asia

Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX), the city-state’s primary asset exchange, is in the process of establishing Bitcoin perpetual futures trading on the platform.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashInstitutional product offeringAccording to a report published by Bloomberg earlier this week, the exchange platform intends to launch Bitcoin futures sometime during H2 2025. The product launch will be subject to regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). A spokesperson for the company told Bloomberg that the product offering will be geared exclusively towards institutional investors and traders in an effort to “significantly expand institutional market access.” Retail access to the product will be prohibited. Once launched, these Bitcoin perpetual futures contracts, being offered through a traditional finance (TradFi) outfit like SGX, will help to blur the lines between TradFi and the emerging crypto sector. Perpetual futures have no expiry date. They offer a means for traders to bet on price changes in an underlying asset while doing away with the need to take ownership of the asset itself. Cautious approachSGX has been cautious in listing crypto assets and derivative products. Last year the firm’s CEO, Loh Boon Chye, said that the time was not yet right for such listings.  His concern back then was that any such product launches would need “sustainable ecosystem support,” adding that “that means demand, that means governance, that means structure.” While spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had been approved in the United States at that point, there has been much further development in the crypto-sphere since then, following the election of a pro-crypto administration in the U.S. That event has had knock-on effects globally. Singapore’s SGX isn’t the only traditional exchange platform to respond. Japanese futures exchange, the Osaka Dojima Exchange (ODEX), is gearing up to file an application with the Financial Services Agency (FSA) to list a Bitcoin futures product later this month. Closer to home, an American digital asset marketplace that focuses on institutional trading, EDX Markets, has plans to introduce Bitcoin perpetual futures products to the Singaporean market, according to a report which emerged in January. In May 2024, EDX launched EDXM Global, a settlement platform, in Singapore. This product launch by SGX serves the purposes of decision-makers in Singapore, who have been trying to position the city-state as a digital asset industry hub. Additionally, the move will bring greater acceptance of the digital assets sector from traditional market participants. Crypto perpetual futures contracts were first pioneered by crypto derivatives exchanges like BitMEX back in 2016. Since then, other crypto-native platforms like Binance and OKX have offered these products. In the case of unregulated offshore exchanges, the products have proven to be controversial, as at times, they have been used in a manner that has exposed market participants to counterparty risk. Failed crypto exchange FTX, together with its sister company Alameda Research, relied on the products in their trading activities. SGX, as a seasoned, regulated TradFi operator, which holds an Aa2 rating from Moody’s, is likely to prove to be a more palatable option for institutional players.

Hong Kong Adapts Crypto Regulations to Broaden Market AccessHong Kong’s financial regulator has taken a further regulatory step in its evolving stance on cryptocurrency trading, widening the scope of retail access to digital assets through intermediaries.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashResponding to growing demandThe move follows a surge in interest in spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and recent investigations into the unlicensed operations of the JPEX exchange. In a circular published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on Friday, the regulator explained that the policy shift was prompted by changing market dynamics and growing inquiries from the industry.The new guidelines aim to extend access to a broader clientele and facilitate the direct deposit and withdrawal of virtual assets through intermediaries, all while maintaining stringent safeguards. The circular states:”The policy is updated in light of the latest market developments and enquiries from the industry seeking to further expand retail access through intermediaries and to allow investors to directly deposit and withdraw virtual assets to/from intermediaries with appropriate safeguards.”Cautionary notesDespite this welcome expansion, there are a couple of cautionary notes included within the circular. Hong Kong remains circumspect about overseas virtual asset (VA) products, deeming them “complex” and, as a result, riskier. The circular emphasizes that “VA-related products considered complex should only be offered to professional investors.” For instance, an overseas VA non-derivative ETF is likely to fall into this category.The other condition pertains to potential clients, who will be required to undergo a one-off test to assess their knowledge of investing and ensure they possess the financial wherewithal to manage the risks associated with virtual asset trading. Furthermore, intermediaries must furnish clients with comprehensive risk disclosure statements.The regulator also places an onus on the intermediary to set a limit for each retail client, to ensure that a retail client’s exposure to virtual assets is reasonable. The circular outlines that deposit and withdrawal of client funds should only happen through the use of segregated funding accounts on an SFC-licensed platform.Crypto sector aspirationsThis shift in regulation underscores Hong Kong’s ongoing aspirations to solidify its position as a hub for virtual assets. The territory embarked on a new regulatory regime in June, enabling applications for crypto trading platform licenses. By August, the first batch of licenses was granted, allowing exchanges to cater to retail customers. This marked a notable turnaround from Hong Kong’s prior 18 months of skepticism and hostility toward the cryptocurrency sector.The timing of these regulatory changes coincides with surging interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs, with JPMorgan even suggesting that approval in the US could materialize within months. This shift in regulatory perspective in Hong Kong also follows the investigation and accusations made against the JPEX exchange for conducting unlicensed operations, leading to arrests and the promise to disclose details of licensed applicants. The JPEX scandal has also dampened public confidence in crypto in Hong Kong more recently.Hong Kong is adapting its crypto regulations to be more inclusive while maintaining a cautious approach toward complex overseas virtual asset products. This regulatory shift underscores the region’s determination to foster its status as a leading hub for virtual assets, following a change of heart from its previous stance of skepticism and reluctance towards the crypto industry.

Research Finds Over 90% of Korean Cryptos Prone to Pump-and-Dump SchemesThe Korea Institute of Finance (KIF) has released a report revealing that 91.3% of South Korean-issued cryptocurrencies, known as “kimchi coins,” are prone to pump-and-dump (P&D) schemes. These schemes involve intentionally spreading false information on social media platforms to manipulate token prices. This is done with the intention of selling the tokens at artificially inflated prices.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashP&D prevalenceThese manipulative practices were frequently observed during the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market from 2020 to 2022. Previous research papers indicate that P&D schemes commonly occur on multiple crypto exchanges and typically unfold within a time frame of 10 minutes. It has been observed that cryptocurrencies with lower liquidity and smaller market capitalization are particularly vulnerable to becoming prime targets for these schemes.Korean market and global marketThe Korean cryptocurrency market stands out with its significant number of cryptocurrencies listed on a single exchange, including kimchi coins. This distinction becomes evident when comparing it to the global market. In the Korean market, the top 10 global cryptocurrencies, ranked by their market capitalization, account for 59% of the total market share. Meanwhile, in the global market, they represent 84.9%. This contrast indicates that the Korean market has a larger proportion of alternative coins, also known as altcoins, which are more susceptible to pump-and-dump schemes and other manipulative activities.According to a survey conducted by the Financial Services Commission in the second half of 2022, there were a total of 625 listed coins (excluding duplicate listings), with 389 (62.24%) of them being listed on a single exchange. Among these single-exchange listed cryptos, 223 were kimchi coins, which is equivalent to 57%.OHLCV data analysisIn this KIF paper, research analyst Baik Yeon-ju delved into abnormal price patterns within the Korean cryptocurrency market. She analyzed the hourly Open-High-Low-Close-Volume (OHLCV) data of kimchi coins in October 2021. The study revealed that out of a total of 16,560 hourly price and volume observations, approximately 4.7% exhibited characteristics consistent with P&D schemes. Baik noted that 91.3% (21 of the 23) observed kimchi coins witnessed such movements.Legislative effortsMeanwhile, it is encouraging that the South Korean National Assembly passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill during its plenary session on June 30. This legislation, set to go effective in July next year, aims to provide protection for customers’ assets in the virtual asset space. The act not only establishes regulations to combat unfair trading practices but also enforces penalties for non-compliance.Call for further measuresHowever, Baik suggested that policies should be further strengthened to enhance investor protection within the crypto market. In order to achieve this, she proposed the implementation of a monitoring system for virtual asset service operators (VASPs) and the allocation of inspection and investigation personnel, as well as technical resources. It is also necessary to address potential conflicts that may arise with the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality, particularly if the data required from VASPs falls under the classification of financial transaction information and personal information.Furthermore, considering the lack of transparency surrounding many altcoins regarding their projects and exchange listings, Baik suggests that the upcoming second virtual asset bill should tackle this issue by regulating the issuance and disclosure of these cryptocurrencies. Additionally, she highlighted the importance of conducting research based on empirical data to detect abnormal transactions. This approach enables the recognition of existing issues and the acquisition of concrete evidence, which serves as a credible basis for policymakers to enact relevant legislation.