VCs Say US Crypto Crackdown Opportunity for Asia

Kazakhstan setback for Coinbase as government blocks website accessIn alignment with the Law on Digital Assets legislation which was enacted in February, Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Culture and Information has officially confirmed that access to the Coinbase website has been blocked within the country.The development follows the enforcement of regulations prohibiting the issuance and trading of unsecured digital currencies, according to local news media.Photo by Kai Pilger on UnsplashAccusation of regulatory violationThe authorities in Kazakhstan initiated the blocking of local IP addresses from accessing Coinbase as early as September. The action was taken in response to a request from the Ministry of Digital Development. The Ministry of Digital Development accused Coinbase of violating the Law on Digital Assets, resulting in the restriction of access to the platform.The Law on Digital Assets, introduced earlier in 2023, stipulates that the issuance and circulation of unsecured digital assets are prohibited. The exception to this rule is within the Astana International Financial Center (AIFC), a designated economic zone in Kazakhstan. Permits to operate crypto trading platforms within the AIFC are issued by the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA).Several cryptocurrency exchanges have already received approval from the AFSA. Notable names among these approved exchanges include Binance, Bybit, CaspianEx, Biteeu, ATAIX, Upbit and Xignal&MT.Reports of access issues to the Coinbase website initially emerged in September, with the local Telegram media outlet Finance.kz referring to it as the “great Kazakh investment firewall.” This firewall was not limited to Coinbase. It also affected access to other major international crypto exchanges such as Kraken.Stringent regulationKazakhstan’s approach to crypto regulation has been notably stringent, particularly concerning its significant mining sector, which ranks among the world’s largest. In October, eight leading cryptocurrency mining operators wrote an open letter to President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, expressing concerns about the challenging conditions faced by the crypto-mining industry.Those entities included BCD Company, TT Tech Limited, Green Power Solution, Kinur Invest, KZ Systems, AI Solutions and VerCom. High energy prices for miners were cited as a significant issue, leading to what was described as a “very distressful situation” in the sector.Mining got off on the wrong footing in Kazakhstan. Following the banning of crypto mining activities in China in May 2021, there was a sudden influx of miners into Kazakhstan. As that development wasn’t planned for, it led to major stresses being placed on the country’s electricity grid. As a consequence, blackouts occurred.While this development in Kazakhstan is unwelcome news for Coinbase, the company has experienced more positive outcomes elsewhere. Last week it emerged that the U.S. crypto exchange had outperformed Q3 revenue estimates. That said, it also emerged that the exchange’s trading volumes had declined for the second consecutive quarter in a row.Kazakhstan’s move to block Coinbase access underlines the country’s determination to enforce its digital asset regulations, contributing to a growing trend of governments worldwide seeking to bring crypto-related activities under regulatory oversight.

A Chinese creditor of failed crypto exchange FTX has filed an objection on his own behalf and that of 300 others, with a U.S. bankruptcy court against a motion lodged with a view towards excluding payouts to creditors resident in China, Russia and 47 other foreign jurisdictions.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashPotential distribution forfeitureThe FTX Recovery Trust, an entity formed in January to oversee the FTX bankruptcy estate following the adoption of a plan of reorganization, filed a motion last week seeking the approval of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the United States to adhere to new parameters related to the claims of creditors residing in restricted overseas jurisdictions. Besides China and Russia, the list of restricted jurisdictions also includes many within the Asian region, including  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Macau, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The FTX estate claims that these jurisdictions have regulations and laws restricting cryptocurrency transactions. In such cases, the FTX Recovery Trust claims that it cannot break local laws.  The difficulty for creditors resident in these countries is that if it's deemed illegal to reimburse them, they won’t qualify for the next scheduled distribution from the estate. In that instance, distribution forfeiture will be triggered. Taking to X on July 7, FTXcreditor.com, an entity that has been buying up bankruptcy claims from FTX creditors over the course of the FTX bankruptcy process, highlighted the peril that creditors residing in these restricted countries may face. It stated: “Distribution forfeiture is triggered at every distribution record date. The first record date already passed, if your claim is still tied to a local KYC when the stamp drops, that tranche is potentially gone.” Short timeframe for objectionsMr. Purple, a pseudonymous distressed assets bankruptcy professional who has been advocating for FTX creditors since the collapse of the business in November 2022, concurred with this view in a subsequent post on X. He pointed out that an extremely short timeframe has been given to affected creditors to respond. The motion was filed on July 2 and objections are due by July 15. $500 million in claims are at stake which accounts for 5% of all creditor claims. Of this, 82% of these claims belong to Chinese creditors. In a series of follow-up posts, the bankruptcy professional describes several procedural issues that he believes will result in it being incredibly difficult for affected creditors to have their funds reimbursed.Mr. Purple concludes:”The incentives are designed to be extremely risk averse in finding [a legal opinion] that paying creditors is legal! [The estate’s lawyers will] take the fees and say its not legal.” In his court filing, the Chinese creditor, who is resident in Singapore, stated: “My family holds four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million USD.” . . . “We have fully complied with every procedural requirement under the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and inequitable manner.” On X, he asserted that the FTX Recovery Trust’s motion “constitutes an impermissible and material modification of the Plan.” Aside from legal action, the only other potential solution for creditors residing in restricted countries is to sell their claims. However, claims buyers are pricing in greater risk with lower rates and less favorable terms.

South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party has set up a new task force to accelerate the creation of a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins, aiming to unify competing legislative proposals ahead of government guidelines expected in October. According to Etoday, the nine-member group, chaired by Representative Lee Jung-moon of the National Policy Committee, is composed of lawmakers from three key parliamentary committees. Its primary objective is to consolidate the party's position on digital asset policy and coordinate with the Financial Services Commission (FSC) to establish a definitive rulebook for the burgeoning sector. Lee stated that the task force would work to harmonize multiple stablecoin bills already circulating within the party, noting that there was mounting pressure from both regulators and the private sector. He explained that government agencies had urged swift legislative action, while financial institutions and exchanges preparing to launch won-pegged stablecoins were waiting for regulatory certainty.Photo by SC Jang on UnsplashRegulatory debate over capital standardsA central point of contention for the task force will be establishing appropriate capital requirements for stablecoin issuers. Current proposals vary in scope, with suggested thresholds ranging from 500 million won (approximately $358,000), a figure intended to encourage fintech innovation, to as high as 5 billion won (about $3.58 million) to prioritize investor protection. The committee is tasked with striking a balance between fostering market growth and ensuring financial stability. Seoul's initiative reflects a broader global movement toward formal oversight of fiat-backed digital currencies. The U.S. passed its GENIUS Act for stablecoins in July, while the EU has implemented its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. Similarly, Japan amended its Payment Services Act in 2023 to restrict stablecoin issuance to licensed banks and registered financial firms. Former White House crypto advisor’s inputThe push for clear rules has drawn keen interest from industry leaders. Speaking at Korea Blockchain Week 2025 in Seoul, Bo Hines, chief executive of Tether USAT, stressed the regulatory clarity provided by the GENIUS Act in the U.S. According to ZDnet Korea, he noted that his company's new dollar-backed token, USAT, is designed for full compliance with U.S. law, featuring one-to-one reserves and audits by top-tier accounting firms to attract institutional investors. Hines, a former digital assets adviser at the White House, clarified that USAT is intended to serve the regulated U.S. market, complementing Tether’s flagship product, USDT, which has a global user base exceeding 500 million. He also discussed Tether’s view of South Korea as a key market, pointing to the significant USDT trading volumes there. Hines encouraged the country to adopt comparable stablecoin standards and expressed optimism that it would move toward a more open and efficient global financial network. With the FSC’s guidance approaching, the Democratic Party’s task force is working to reconcile differing legislative proposals. The resulting framework will shape the pace at which stablecoins move from pilot projects to an established part of South Korea’s financial system.