Blockchain Experts from Ethereum, Solana, and More to Visit Seoul for Upbit D Conference

As is the case in the rest of the world, South Korea is also experiencing a bullish cryptocurrency market these days. However, local blockchain companies that started their business between 2017 and 2018 – those considered the first-generation blockchain firms – are trying to distance themselves from the label “blockchain,” removing words such as “block,” “chain” or “coin” from their names to rebrand themselves.  This is largely due to local regulations that stifle blockchain businesses and widespread negative perspectives towards the crypto industry among the public, the local media outlet News1 reported. Photo by Robert Stump on UnsplashMediBloc rebrands itself to WeavrCare: The two-track strategy Among the first-generation blockchain firms that changed its name is MediBloc. Founded in April 2017 as a blockchain-based digital health company, MediBloc rebranded its Korean branch last month to WeavrCare, combining the words "weave" and "care" to highlight its commitment to connecting patients and hospitals onchain.  WeavrCare offers a blockchain healthcare data platform named Panacea, where patients can directly manage their own medical data. It also provides a blockchain-based medical data and insurance claim platform Medipass. MediBloc's native token MED is currently listed on prominent local crypto exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.  The company is known to have well weathered the crypto winter between 2022 and 2023 by pitching a cloud electronic medical record (EMR) solution, Dr. Palette, which enables medical staff to easily check medical charts and manage patients' data.  Following its rebranding, WeavrCare has demonstrated its intention to pursue a two-track strategy, with the company’s Gibraltar branch focusing on blockchain business under the original corporate name MediBloc. In contrast, WeavrCare in Korea will focus on expanding new businesses including Dr. Palette.  Meanwhile, WeavrCare has reportedly embarked on investor relations (IR) activities to secure a Series B investment.  Chain Partners rebrands itself to AI3: Merging Web3 with AIChain Partners, a blockchain firm focused on crypto exchanges and the over-the-counter (OTC) markets, has also recently rebranded itself to AI3, a new name that the company expects will illustrate its aim of focusing more on AI businesses. The name reflects the company's dedication to exploring both Web3 and generative AI technology.  Following its rebranding, AI3 has embarked on developing an AI service equipped with a prompt response system. AI3 had already launched a personal AI assistant dubbed Wrks last year, which aims to improve workflows. A company official said AI3 is currently preparing for IR to qualify for a Series A investment.  CPLABS and Parameta: Earlier pioneers of blockchain Meanwhile, other blockchain firms that launched their businesses earlier than the above two companies have already completed their rebranding last year. CoinPlug changed its name to CPLABS, and Iconloop to Parameta.  

South Korea’s financial regulator is preparing a second major cryptocurrency bill that would expand investor protections, strengthen stablecoin safeguards, and potentially impose governance changes at the country’s largest exchanges, as domestic token projects warn that regulatory uncertainty is curbing growth. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is drafting the Digital Asset Basic Act, a so-called “phase two” bill that follows an earlier virtual asset user protection regime which took effect in July 2024. According to Yonhap News, the bill is expected to address stablecoin risks by requiring issuers to hold reserve assets in instruments such as bank deposits and government bonds, and to deposit or place in trust at least 100% of outstanding issuance with banks or other designated custodians. It would also extend existing financial-sector rules to crypto firms in areas including disclosures, terms and conditions, and advertising. In addition, the proposal could impose no-fault liability on virtual asset service providers for losses stemming from hacks or system failures, in line with standards under Korea’s Electronic Financial Transactions Act, which governs traditional financial institutions and payment services.Photo by Timothy Ries on UnsplashGovernance dominance at exchangesA separate report by KBS said the draft bill includes measures to overhaul governance at South Korea’s four major crypto exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit—which together serve about 11 million users. The FSC has raised concerns about concentrated control by founders and major shareholders, and is considering a governance framework similar to that applied to alternative trading systems (ATS) under Korea’s Capital Markets Act. That could include limits designed to prevent any single shareholder from holding too much control, capping controlling stakes at around 15% to 20%. Under Korea’s current Capital Markets Act, an ATS is generally barred from holding more than 15% of voting shares, including those held by related parties, with limited exceptions allowing stakes of up to 30%. If similar limits were applied to crypto exchanges, the changes could affect Dunamu, the operator of Upbit. Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyung holds a stake in the mid-20% range and, under the proposal as described, could face pressure to sell roughly 10% of his holdings. The proposal could have implications for the deal, as Dunamu is pursuing a merger with Naver Financial through a comprehensive stock swap. While the bill’s broad outlines are taking shape, regulators are still working to narrow differences over stablecoin rules, and the final proposal is expected to be submitted to the National Assembly next year. Key unresolved issues include eligibility requirements for stablecoin issuers, whether to establish an interagency consultative body during the licensing process, initial capital thresholds, and whether a single entity should be allowed to both issue and distribute stablecoins. The core dispute centers on who should be allowed to issue stablecoins. The Bank of Korea is said to favor limiting issuance to consortia in which banks hold at least a 51% stake, while the FSC is believed to oppose writing a mandatory bank ownership threshold into law, arguing that such a requirement could limit broader participation by technology firms. ‘Kimchi coin’ listings stall amid cautionEven as policymakers push ahead, regulatory uncertainty is curbing growth among South Korean blockchain projects. News1 reported that Upbit listed only one token from a domestic project in 2025, out of 54 tokens added for trading since the start of the year—the native token of Story, a peer-to-peer intellectual property network powered by blockchain and co-founded by Korean entrepreneur Lee Seung-yoon. Upbit also removed 10 tokens during the period, seven of which were so-called “kimchi coins,” a colloquial term for tokens originating in South Korea or developed by Korean teams. Industry participants attribute the removals to increasingly risk-averse behavior by exchanges amid regulatory uncertainty, which can complicate promotional efforts and trust-building while constraining early-stage liquidity. TradFi players seek crypto integrationsWhile local token projects face headwinds, interest from traditional financial institutions appears to be picking up. Chosun Biz reported that Mirae Asset Financial Group is considering an acquisition of Korbit, with its non-financial affiliate Mirae Asset Consulting seen as a potential buyer of shares from major shareholders NXC and SK Planet. Industry analysts estimate the deal could be worth up to 140 billion won ($97 million). The group’s founder, Park Hyeon-joo, has said he is developing a strategy to bridge traditional and digital assets, arguing that it is time to prepare for the next wave of financial innovation. In payments, EBN Industrial News reported that BC Card has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with U.S.-based crypto exchange Coinbase to test USDC payments in South Korea. The pilot would integrate BC Card’s QR payment system with wallets on Coinbase’s Base blockchain to assess whether USDC can function as a viable payment method at local merchants. 

Kuwait Implements Full Ban on Crypto ActivitiesIn a significant move to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, Kuwait has taken a decisive step by announcing a complete ban on all crypto-related activities.Photo by Jan Dommerholt on Unsplash“No legal status”According to a circular issued by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), Kuwait’s top financial regulator, earlier this week, cryptocurrencies are deemed to have “no legal status” and lack the support of any government or any asset. As a result, the prices of these digital assets are vulnerable to speculative swings, exposing investors to potential substantial losses. Consequently, the CMA asserts that engaging in crypto activities can lead to adverse consequences and financial risks for individuals and businesses alike.The ban extends beyond trading and mining. It also prohibits public companies from offering any cryptocurrency-related services. The CMA emphasized that it has never granted approval for crypto services in the past, and this outright ban reinforces the country’s commitment to curbing illicit financial activities facilitated by cryptocurrencies.Aligning with FATFThe decision comes in the wake of Kuwait’s determination to align with the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) global requirements for handling crypto assets. The country is attempting to demonstrate its compliance with international anti-money laundering guidelines by clamping down on digital assets.Kuwait’s approach towards cryptocurrencies diverges significantly from other Gulf states that have embraced the nascent industry with more openness. The likes of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain have previously engaged with crypto assets in various ways.For example, Bahrain granted approval to global crypto exchange platform Binance to provide digital asset services within the country. It’s keen to embrace digital assets as it pivots away from an oil-based economy. The Kingdom recently welcomed plans by Singapore-based private equity firm Whampoa Group to establish a crypto-friendly digital bank there.Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund has also invested in several US-based venture capital funds which are focused on crypto and blockchain technologies.Dubai, in particular, has been actively working on establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets, aiming to position itself as a digital hub in the region. The UAE as a whole has recognized crypto assets as securities for several years, fostering a favorable environment for crypto businesses.CriticismNews of the ban also provoked criticism, including commentary from Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer with the Human Rights Foundation. Gladstein, taking to Twitter, stated: “ Not surprising. I expect all authoritarian regimes (especially gulf tyrannies like the UAE and Saudi Arabia) to follow in Kuwait’s footsteps and eventually pass severe restrictions on citizen use of Bitcoin.” While the UAE trends in the opposite direction, Gladstein is not optimistic about the free use of decentralized cryptocurrencies in the UAE over the longer term.As the global crypto landscape continues to evolve, each country in the Gulf region is adopting unique approaches to address the opportunities and challenges posed by digital assets. While there may be opposition to the technology, decentralized digital assets will benefit from jurisdictional arbitrage in efforts to get this innovation rolled out for the benefit of ordinary people around the world.