Top

Dubai Regulator Issues Reprimand to OPNX Founders

Policy & Regulation·May 03, 2023, 1:27 AM

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulator that concerns itself with the digital assets market in the Emirate of Dubai, has formally reprimanded the founders of digital asset exchange OPNX.

Photo by Kai Pilger on Unsplash

VARA issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 to inform investors that OPNX was not a licensed entity regulated by VARA and with that, it urged investors to be cautious. The regulator has now gone one further, this time formally writing to OPNX’s founders to reprimand them.

The statement cites the following rationale for the issuance of the reprimand:

”Carrying out VA (Virtual Asset) Exchange Services on an unregulated basis in and from the Emirate of Dubai; and Marketing, promoting and/or advertising OPNX services and its native token [FLEX] without the necessary permits from VARA.”

 

Contextual background

The statement goes on to provide the context for the regulator’s most recent action. VARA became aware of OPNX soliciting the public to use the exchange in February of this year. It noted that the business was actively marketing through various social media channels “without establishing warranted restrictions for residents of Dubai/UAE.” VARA went on to explain that OPNX commenced trading in April without having secured a regulatory license despite the activity warranting such a license.

 

Cease and desist

On February 27, VARA issued OPNX with a cease and desist order, relative to the foundation of the business and the marketing and promotion of services. Thereafter, the exchange applied certain restrictions but the regulator deemed the measures to not have been applied comprehensively across all OPNX communication channels, prompting it to issue a further cease and desist order the following month.

The investor and marketplace alert followed in April as OPNX proceeded to launch its exchange. The written reprimand was then issued on April 18, “to address historical and ongoing activity conducted on an unregulated basis.” The recipients included the OPNX founders, (Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, Kyle Davies and Su Zhu) and the firm’s CEO Leslie Lamb.

Given what the regulator deems to have been “a continued lack of satisfactory remedial action [taken] by the responsible parties,” it is continuing to actively monitor the situation. VARA stated that it will further investigate OPNX’s activity to assess further corrective measures that may be required to protect the market.

 

Lack of industry support

The digital assets industry is in no way enamored with founders Davies and Zhu. Their record has been badly blemished by the unceremonious collapse of their crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital, in 2022. That failure wreaked major damage on the overarching crypto space, directly leading to the failure of other crypto businesses later that year.

Prominent crypto venture capitalist Michael Arrington said of their capital raise for OPNX that it was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.” It later transpired that two of the investment firms that OPNX suggested were backing the start-up refuted the claim.

In response to this latest development, OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb told Blockworks that the business was initially launched in Hong Kong. “To confirm, we have no Dubai or UAE customers and do full KYC on all users,” she stated.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jul 12, 2023

Seoul Prosecutors to Establish Dedicated Division to Combat Crypto Crimes

Seoul Prosecutors to Establish Dedicated Division to Combat Crypto CrimesSeoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office announced that by the end of this month, it will establish a specialized division dedicated to investigating cryptocurrency crimes, according to local news agency Yonhap. This move marks the introduction of the first-ever cryptocurrency-focused investigation organization within South Korea’s prosecution system.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashInvestigation and legal analysisThe newly formed joint cryptocurrency investigation division will prioritize its efforts on combating various crypto-related crimes, including fraudulent activities. Furthermore, the division will examine legal documents to determine whether certain virtual assets constitute securities.This introduction of a specialized division by the public prosecution is expected to streamline and expedite ongoing investigations into cryptocurrency-related cases, demonstrating the authorities’ dedication to addressing the emerging challenges associated with illicit activities in the crypto sphere.Investor protection effortsSouth Korea has been ramping up its initiatives to safeguard crypto investors. Notably, last month, the National Assembly’s plenary session passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, which is scheduled to take effect in July of next year. Further strengthening the protective framework, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently announced a plan to require companies to disclose their virtual asset holdings in the footnotes of financial statements.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 16, 2023

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto Clients

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto ClientsHong Kong’s banking regulator is urging banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, to onboard crypto exchanges as clients, despite increasing regulatory scrutiny of the industry in the United States.That’s according to a report published by the Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday. The FT cited three people who it claims are familiar with the matter, together with a letter seen by the publication as the basis for the assertion.Photo by Ansel Lee on PexelsChallenging crypto banking reticenceAt a recent meeting, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) questioned these UK-based lenders, together with the Bank of China, about their reluctance to accept crypto exchanges as customers, according to sources familiar with the matter. The HKMA emphasized that due diligence on potential clients should not create unnecessary burdens, particularly for those seeking opportunities in Hong Kong. While banks do not have a ban on crypto clients, concerns over potential money laundering and illegal activities have made them cautious.The pressure faced by banks highlights the challenges Hong Kong is facing in establishing itself as a global hub for the crypto industry, especially in light of previous high-profile collapses, such as the implosion of FTX. However, the HKMA is encouraging banks to overcome their reservations, as the regulator believes there is resistance from senior executives who adhere to traditional banking mindsets.The enthusiasm of some Hong Kong officials for the sector is evident as pro-Beijing lawmaker Johnny Ng invited Coinbase and other crypto exchanges to set up operations in the city following the recent SEC lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase.Caught between opposing forcesBanks in Hong Kong find themselves walking a fine line between supporting the crypto industry as encouraged by the government and being cautious due to the US regulatory environment. They want to ensure the industry’s development aligns with government policies, but they are also concerned about potential anti-money laundering and know-your-customer issues.The HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have been vocal about their expectations, setting them apart from regulators in other jurisdictions that may be more skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Last month it emerged that crypto startups are having difficulties in establishing banking facilities in the autonomous Chinese territory. At the time, the HKMA did convene a meeting to bring parties together in order to forge a path forward.While Hong Kong has a history as a crypto center, its position weakened after Beijing’s crackdown on the industry in 2017. However, the Hong Kong government aims to reestablish the city as a hub for digital assets, having expressed its desire to provide a supportive environment for crypto-related businesses. The introduction of a new licensing regime for crypto platforms in Hong Kong is part of the government’s efforts to attract more crypto groups to the city.HSBC, Standard Chartered, and the Bank of China hold influential positions in Hong Kong as issuers of the city’s currency and have key roles in the Hong Kong Association of Banks lobby group. Standard Chartered claims that it maintains regular dialogue with regulators on various subjects, while HSBC has claimed that it is actively engaging in policies and developments within the nascent industry.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Apr 11, 2023

South Korean Prosecutors Fail to Recover Do Kwon’s Assets

South Korean Prosecutors Fail to Recover Do Kwon’s AssetsSouth Korean prosecutors have disclosed that they have been unable to find the millions of dollars that Do Kwon, CEO and Founder of Terraform Labs, made from the crypto business.©Pexels/GratisographyOverseas assetsThe latest development in the case suggests that Kwon may have tried to hide his assets overseas, making it more challenging for authorities to recover those funds.Prosecutors claim that Do Kwon transferred funds from his personal accounts to overseas bank accounts under his mother’s name. Additionally, he allegedly used cryptocurrency to purchase real estate and other assets in the United States, which he then registered under his mother’s name. This tactic is commonly used by those seeking to evade detection and protect their assets from seizure.Binance halt requestSouth Korean authorities are understood to have reached out to global cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, requesting it to halt any withdrawal request associated with Kwon. Binance confirmed to CoinTelegraph that it is cooperating with the request, stating: “We provided Korean law enforcement authorities with the requested assistance. Since we cannot comment on ongoing law enforcement investigations, for any further comment please reach out to the prosecutors.”Blockchain forensicsThe situation surrounding Do Kwon’s case is not uncommon in crypto. Although there are blockchain forensic analysis specialists who collaborate with government authorities in tracing digital assets, the task is not without its difficulties. By analyzing the blockchain, investigators can trace the flow of funds and identify the individuals involved in illicit activities. This technology has already been used in a number of high-profile cases, including the 2014 Mt. Gox hack and the 2020 Twitter hack.Nevertheless, the anonymous nature of blockchain transactions makes it much easier for individuals who engage in fraudulent or illegal activities. However, as cryptocurrency becomes more mainstream, governments around the world are cracking down on those who attempt to take advantage of the system.Tightening regulationIn South Korea, authorities have been working to regulate the cryptocurrency industry and protect consumers from fraud. The government has implemented a number of measures, including requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to register with the Financial Services Commission and banning anonymous transactions. Despite these efforts, however, incidents of fraud and embezzlement continue to occur.The fight against cryptocurrency-related crime is far from over. As the industry continues to grow and evolve, criminals will continue to find new ways to exploit the system. It is up to regulators and law enforcement officials to remain vigilant and adapt to these changes in order to protect consumers and ensure the integrity of the financial system.In the case of Do Kwon, the investigation is ongoing, and it remains to be seen what the final outcome will be. Prosecutors estimate total proceeds of Do Kwon’s alleged crimes to amount to 91.4 billion won ($71 million) while 414.5 billion won ($316 million) has been identified relative to Terraform Labs more broadly.

news
Loading