EDUM partners with MNet to promote educational blockchain service

Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of Japan’s Democratic Party for the People (DPP), has outlined that if elected the party will introduce a crypto tax plan that will bring about the lowering of taxation on crypto gains to 20%. Tamaki’s comments come ahead of the Asian nation's elections, which are due to be held on Oct. 27. Taking to the X social media platform on Oct. 19, Tamaki wrote: “If you think crypto assets should be taxed separately at 20% instead of treated as miscellaneous income, please vote for the Democratic Party for the People. There will be no tax when exchanging crypto assets with other crypto assets.”Photo by Liger Pham on PexelsCrypto taxation reformThe DPP leader added that he would be appreciative of people spreading the word and letting the broader Japanese public know about this commitment that is being made in respect of crypto taxation reform. The reduction to 20% would bring the treatment of crypto in line with that of the stock market in Japan, where gains are already taxed at the 20% tax rate. The DPP leader included a graphic within his X post that provided further detail. It outlined that a loss carry-forward deduction could be applied by the taxpayer within a three-year timeframe.  A tax exemption would apply when it comes to the exchange of crypto assets. The DPP is also in favor of increasing the permitted leverage multiple from 2x to 10x relative to crypto trading. Finally, the party supports the introduction of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Japan. Focusing on developing Web3In response to an X user, Tamaki claimed that the DPP would consider a reduced taxation policy to be inclusive of other financial income in the future. However, for right now, the DPP leader said that the focus was on making Japan “a strong nation in the Web3 business.” Another Japanese crypto community member suggested that the proposed tax cut would lead to an increase in tax revenues, based upon the assertion that many people don’t file tax returns simply because tax calculations are too difficult right now. While the plan is positive for Japan’s crypto community, the DPP is unlikely to be in a position to implement such a plan. The party currently holds just seven of the 465 seats in the National Diet, the Asian nation’s House of Representatives.  Tax reform guidelinesCurrently, the applicable tax rate applied to crypto revenues can reach as high as 55% in Japan. At the end of August Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) unveiled new tax reform guidelines for 2025. One component of those proposals was the suggestion that the crypto tax rate should be reduced to 20%. With that, if Tamaki’s DPP can’t influence matters, the regulator’s proposals may be of sufficient weight to have the matter addressed. The approach taken to the taxation of crypto in various jurisdictions is having a bearing in terms of the competitiveness of those locations relative to the development and further roll-out of Web3 technologies. Earlier this month, the United Arab Emirates took a positive step forward by exempting crypto from value-added tax (VAT). Meanwhile, in Indonesia the local regulator is moving towards a re-evaluation of what is considered to be a harsh taxation policy relative to crypto. 

At the Foresight 2024 Hong Kong Summit on Aug. 11, Gary Tiu, director and head of regulatory affairs for OSL, a crypto market custodian, exchange and prime brokerage, outlined in a panel discussion that the crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in the Chinese autonomous territory is challenged insofar as it lacks market incentives.Photo by Cecelia Chang on UnsplashThe intermediary problemTiu’s company hosted the event, alongside Foresight News and crypto publication The Block, who reported on Tiu’s comments. The OSL executive said that when it comes to funds and structured products in Hong Kong, there’s a “very rich layer of intermediaries— brokers, banks, private banks, retail banks, etc.” involved. Tiu explained that they make a lot of money from the distribution of such products, resulting in unlisted products being marketed far more effectively by comparison with listed products. It’s against that backdrop of misaligned incentives that Tiu identifies challenges for crypto ETFs on the public markets in Hong Kong. He stated: “So I think the incentive system in Hong Kong is one of the reasons why ETFs do have a bit of a hard time growing as a financial instrument.” In the case of ETFs, the OSL executive explained that equity brokers take just a few basis points in commission, only about 1-2% of what they make on the sale of structured products. Bias against Bitcoin and EtherTiu is also of the belief that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether have a reputational problem among Hong Kong’s investment community, stating: “I think there is still a bit of a bias in the eyes of the regulators and also in the eyes of the financial institutions, that somehow bitcoin ETF is just this unique class of risk that you need to be extra cautious about.” Chen Zhao, who heads up the digital assets section of Hong Kong-based independent financial advisory firm Fosun Wealth, chimed in with his own concerns. According to Zhao, the crypto ETF products currently marketed in Hong Kong are lacking in terms of the depth of dealers and brokers offering the products. Zhao explained that there are three main types of market participant active on the Hong Kong markets, namely western institutions, Hong Kong-based institutions and their counterparts from mainland China.  Zhao stated: “Chinese brokers and dealers, they’re not allowed or they choose not to deal with the product, and for the western financial institutions, they don’t have the necessity of dealing the products because they acquire more fees and incentives, and have easier access to the U.S. ETFs.” While progress is far more modest by comparison with the U.S. market, the Hong Kong crypto ETF market continues to develop, with spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs setting a record trading volume last week. In the same week, Mox Bank, a subsidiary of British banking multinational Standard Chartered, launched trading services relative to spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF products in Hong Kong. Last month, OSL CEO Patrick Pan, anticipated that an Ethereum ETF product that incorporated staking would launch in Hong Kong within six months. Many commentators have suggested that institutional interest in Ethereum ETFs will begin in earnest once a yield-producing staking product hits the market.

HKX management has advised Hong Kong resident users of the platform to withdraw assets following the company’s decision to halt operations in Hong Kong.  The company publicized its decision on July 18, making the following statement on its website: “We would like to inform you that our management team has, after careful consideration, decided to withdraw our application for the Type 1 and Type 7 licenses under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) and the virtual asset service provider license under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615).”Photo by Zhe ZHANG on UnsplashCompliance strugglesHKX’s exit from Hong Kong is the latest in a series of crypto exchange withdrawals from the Chinese autonomous territory. Other exchanges such as OKX, KuCoin, Gate.io and Binance had all bowed out back in May.  HKX initially applied for a Hong Kong license in February. However, like many others, the exchange failed to comply with Hong Kong’s regulatory requirements. While Hong Kong has been making a concerted effort to establish a regulatory framework and licensing system in order to create the conditions for it to become a crypto hub, it has also been grappling with making regulations strict enough to stamp out fraud in the wake of the JPEX exchange scandal. With that, it appears that many exchanges are finding the regulatory requirements difficult to live with. Originally, 24 exchanges had applied for a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. As it stands today, 12 of those original applicants have dropped out, with one more having its application returned with no clarity emerging as to the reason why. HKX has suspended new user registrations. The company’s management has not suggested that they will reapply for a license and reboot the service at a later stage. The company had flagged its intentions back in May, suspending trading and deposit services on May 29. OKX announced on May 24 that it was withdrawing from the Hong Kong market, citing a review of its business strategy. Around the same timeframe, Gate.io withdrew from the market in Hong Kong having failed to achieve compliance in accordance with the new licensing requirements.  Notwithstanding that outcome, the firm suggested that it planned to revamp its platform in line with the Chinese autonomous territory’s licensing requirements, and return to the market once that had been achieved. In a notice posted to its website on May 22, it stated: “Gate.HK is actively working on the aforementioned overhaul. We plan to resume our business in Hong Kong in the future and contribute to the virtual asset ecosystem after obtaining the relevant licenses.” That overhaul has yet to be completed as right now, the platform only allows the withdrawal of funds by its previous Hong Kong-based customers. Back in May 2023, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, suggested that there would be no light touch regulation in Hong Kong. HashKey Exchange, alongside OSL, was the first business to secure licensing under the new framework. In April, HasKey CEO Livio Weng told the Financial Times that these regulations block access to overseas investors while the local market in Hong Kong isn’t very big. It emerged in recent weeks that Hong Kong regulators are reviewing whether crypto regulation is “excessively stringent.”