Singapore’s Cosmose AI Jilts Stripe in Favor of Near

Bybit Gets Outline Approval to Operate in KazakhstanBybit, the cryptocurrency spot and derivatives trading platform, is expanding its operations with a recent “in-principle” approval from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) in Kazakhstan. This approval allows Bybit to operate as a digital asset trading facility and custody services provider at the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC).Photo by Engin Akyurt on PexelsExpanding area of operationsBen Zhou, the co-founder and CEO of Bybit, expressed his belief in the promising potential of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) region for the growth of the crypto industry. He also emphasized Bybit’s commitment to complying with local regulations, following the recent scrutiny the company faced in Japan for operating without proper registration.To obtain permanent authorization to serve the local market, Bybit must fulfill certain pre-conditions specified in the in-principle approval and complete the application process. In April, it emerged that the company had established its global headquarters in Dubai, where it has already secured “in-principle” approval to operate a virtual assets business. Bybit has also been active in Hong Kong and is in the process of obtaining a license to trade in the Chinese autonomous territory.Debit card and lending servicesAs well as a geographical expansion, in recent months Bybit has also been expanding its service offering. On May 2, the exchange announced the introduction of crypto lending services for its users. This addition allows users to lend and borrow cryptocurrencies through the Bybit platform, providing them with more opportunities to maximize their holdings.Earlier this year, Bybit collaborated with Mastercard to launch a new debit card tailored for cryptocurrency payments. This partnership aimed to bridge the gap between traditional financial systems and the growing crypto ecosystem, allowing users to spend their cryptocurrencies seamlessly in everyday transactions.Kazakhstan’s crypto strategyKazakhstan got off to a difficult start with crypto. Once crypto miners were banished from China, many of them moved operations to Kazakhstan, putting pressure on the local power grid.The local administration has since gotten to grips with the industry, restricting crypto miners’ access to cheap electricity. Bybit’s decision to offer services in Kazakhstan aligns with the country’s current efforts to position itself as a regional hub for crypto, mining, and blockchain.In February, local officials implemented a mandate that requires 75% of revenue generated from crypto mining to be sold through a crypto exchange, with the aim of combating tax evasion.CBDC developmentFurthermore, Kazakhstan has been actively exploring the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and is currently in the pilot phase of its implementation. The introduction of a CBDC can potentially revolutionize the country’s financial landscape, offering faster and more efficient digital transactions while maintaining regulatory oversight.Bybit’s pre-approval in Kazakhstan signifies the company’s strategic expansion into a region with a favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, partnerships between traditional financial institutions and crypto exchanges, like the collaboration between Bybit and Mastercard, demonstrate the increasing integration and acceptance of digital assets in mainstream financial systems.

MAS Offers Guidelines for Banks Handling Crypto-Related ClientsThe Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has released a comprehensive set of guidelines to assist banks in managing clients who are involved in digital assets, such as cryptocurrency exchanges or individuals whose wealth is derived from cryptocurrencies.Photo by Meriç Dağlı on UnsplashIndustry working groupAccording to a report in local media source, The Straits Times, these non-mandatory guidelines, developed by an industry working group, aim to provide best practices for financial institutions to address concerns related to money laundering, terrorism financing, and sanctions risks associated with cryptocurrencies.The working group suggests that enhanced due diligence may be necessary for firms closely connected to facilitating crypto transactions. For instance, conducting site visits or walk-throughs of a client’s anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing processes and controls could be required.During the onboarding process, banks should request information documenting the customer’s crypto exposure and the intended usage of the account. Additionally, banks are advised to establish the source of the client’s funds or wealth.To evaluate the regulatory status of a merchant customer’s crypto-related counterparties, especially if they contribute significantly to the merchant’s transactions, banks should conduct thorough assessments.The working group also highlights the use of blockchain screening tools to review the on-chain activity of digital token payment service providers. Regular screening of new and existing wallet addresses owned or controlled by these providers against the sanctions list and designated wallets is also recommended.Comprehensive guidelinesLoretta Yuen, Head of Legal and Compliance at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp (OCBC), a Singapore-headquartered bank, describes the guidelines as one of the most comprehensive in the world, providing insights into banks’ management of crypto-related money laundering, terrorism financing, and sanctions risks.She believes the guidelines will raise awareness among prospective customers regarding the key risk considerations banks prioritize and enable customers to proactively fulfill banks’ customer due diligence requirements during the onboarding process.Evy Theunis, DBS Bank’s Head of Digital Assets, views the guidelines as a codification of best practices across the industry, aligning with the bank’s existing protocols. United Overseas Bank (UOB) also acknowledges the benefits of the best practice paper, particularly given the diverse range of digital assets with varying levels of risk.Eight participating banksThe working group responsible for developing these guidelines includes representatives from eight banks, MAS, the Commercial Affairs Department, and Big Four audit firm Ernst & Young. Formed in August 2022 under the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism industry partnership (ACIP), the group aims to identify, assess, and mitigate money laundering and terrorism financing risks in Singapore through a collaborative private-public partnership involving the financial sector, regulators, law enforcement agencies, and other government entities.Singapore is vying to establish itself as a hub for digital asset business in Asia, alongside other centers such as Hong Kong. The Chinese autonomous territory has been making greater progress over the course of the past year.However, a report in The Wall Street Journal on Monday suggests that banking remains a difficulty for crypto businesses in Hong Kong. Hong Kong’s difficulty may be Singapore’s opportunity, given the work that this working group has carried out in smoothing the way for the banking of digital asset-related businesses.

A settlement agreement between failed crypto lender BlockFi and bankrupt Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has received approval from a U.S. judge. However, the specifics of the settlement remain sealed, citing concerns raised by yet another failed crypto platform, FTX. Dispute resolvedDuring a hearing on Feb. 6, New Jersey Bankruptcy Court Judge Michael Kaplan resolved the dispute, which saw BlockFi claiming $129 million owed by 3AC, while the Singapore-based firm contended that BlockFi owed it $280 million. Judge Kaplan's decision to keep the settlement agreement sealed stemmed from a perspective that unsealing it would be counterintuitive. BlockFi had filed a motion to seal the settlement terms last month. The U.S. Trustee objected to the seal, asserting that the debtors hadn't provided sufficient justification for sealing the agreement.Photo by mk. s on UnsplashSensitive settlement termsBlockFi justified the need for confidentiality, citing the sensitive commercial nature of the terms, which could potentially impact ongoing litigation involving FTX. The approval of the settlement now paves the way for BlockFi to proceed with distributions from the lending estate to its 100,000 creditors, with the firm owing up to $10 billion. Central to the dispute were preferential payments, transactions made just before bankruptcy that could have given the recipient more than they would have received through court proceedings. The resolution of counterclaims between BlockFi and 3AC follows mediation ordered by Judge Kaplan in October, likely culminating from a two-day hearing starting on Jan. 5 aimed at resolving the matter conclusively. This settlement follows another agreement between 3AC and Genesis, settling $1 billion in claims by 3AC. The company filed for bankruptcy in July 2022, attributing the extreme fluctuations in cryptocurrency markets as the reason for its collapse. Projected 46% 3AC creditor recoveryAccording to a December report to creditors by Teneo, it's estimated that 3AC creditors will receive approximately 45.74% of their claims from the bankrupt estate. As of Dec. 18, 2023, 3AC's assets were valued at $1.16 billion, while recognized claims for distribution stood at $2.7 billion. In an ongoing effort to secure 3AC's assets, a British Virgin Islands (BVI) court froze $1 billion in assets belonging to 3AC's founders, amid the liquidation process. This move is part of a broader strategy to seek recoveries from the founders and Kelly Chen, wife of one of the co-founders. 154 claims totaling $3.4 billion were filed against the 3AC estate, with $200 million not admitted for distribution and $322 million rejected or expected to be rejected. Additionally, claims worth $76 million are currently under dispute. BlockFi, along with eight affiliates, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2022. The firm cited significant exposure, including obligations owed to BlockFi by FTX-linked hedge fund Alameda Research, assets on the FTX platform and an undrawn credit line from FTX. 3AC’s collapse in June 2022, followed by FTX's downfall, led to BlockFi's bankruptcy filing in late November 2022. In a separate development, OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims platform launched by 3AC co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, announced its cessation of operations, with plans to shut down by Feb. 14.