Korean Game Developers to Benefit from Higher NFT Trading Volume

Korean Parliament to Hold Hearing on Virtual Assets Amid ControversiesThe National Policy Committee (NPC) of the South Korean National Assembly has reached an agreement to conduct a hearing on virtual assets next month. This decision comes following discussions between the ruling and opposition parties, as reported by local news outlet Kukinews.Photo by KS KYUNG on UnsplashHearing dateLawmakers Yoon Han-hong and Kim Jong-min, who serve as administrative secretaries of the NPC, have agreed today to hold the virtual assets hearing on July 11. Yoon is a member of the ruling People Power Party (PPP), and Kim is a member of the opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK).During a full session held this afternoon, Lawmaker Kim proposed the idea of a hearing on virtual assets, to which NPC Chair Back Hye-ryun agreed.Growing public interestToday’s meeting was organized to foster a better understanding of the current issues surrounding virtual assets, given the increasing public interest, particularly in light of the recent controversy involving Lawmaker Kim Nam-kook’s alleged ownership of cryptocurrency tokens and the employment of PPP leader Kim Gi-hyeon’s son in a crypto-related company.The NPC intends to finalize the plan for the hearing on June 30, just before the plenary session on the day. The specific focus of the hearing and the participants, including witnesses, will be determined through consultations between the administrative secretaries.

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is proposing new legislation in an effort to prevent the assets of Japanese investors held on crypto exchanges from being transferred overseas. According to local news outlet Jiji Press, the Japanese regulator recently put forward the idea of drafting such a bill. It’s thought that the move suggests that the Japanese regulators have learned from the collapses of cryptocurrency exchanges Mt. Gox and FTX. Photo by Jaison Lin on UnsplashLearning from past failuresWhile Japan already had a higher standard of regulation in place prior to the FTX collapse, likely as a consequence of the authorities having experienced the downfall of Mt. Gox in February 2014, there is still room for improvement.  While funds had been ring-fenced for FTX Japan users, those who accessed services advertised in Japan through the FTX app were deemed to have been accessing a service which fell under an international jurisdiction, denying them the same protections otherwise offered to FTX Japan platform users as a consequence of the regulations that had been put in place. Incorporating a holding orderJapanese media outlet Nikkei described this latest move by the Japanese FSA as follows: “The Financial Services Agency is moving towards creating a new ‘holding order’ in the Payment Services Act, which regulates cryptocurrency exchanges, that will order them not to take domestic assets entrusted to them by customers overseas.” Consequently, the regulator is looking to add this as the latest proposed amendment to the Payment Services Act. Back in September it emerged that amendments to that existing legislation were being looked at with a view towards making it easier for businesses to incorporate digital assets into their service offerings. The regulator has also been mulling over the reclassification of crypto as a financial instrument by amending the Payment Services Act accordingly. Additionally, a more generous tax policy is being proposed. Currently, the Japanese authorities impose a tax rate of up to 55% on cryptocurrency-related revenues. Corporate holders of digital assets have to apply a 30% tax rate, irrespective of income or profits. With that, a 20% tax rate is being considered. The matter became a political issue prior to the East Asian nation’s recent elections, with the leader of the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) backing the application of a 20% crypto tax rate. The application of a holding order has applied previously to companies that have been registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. This proposed amendment would see it applied to virtual asset trading platforms as part of the Payment Services Act. Guarding against bankruptcy lossesIf applied, the amendment would prevent loss of Japanese investor funds in circumstances where a crypto exchange platform goes into bankruptcy. Legal precedent set in the FTX bankruptcy in the United States means that if a user’s funds go into a non-individually segregated hot wallet belonging to an exchange, any property rights, even if explicitly outlined in the terms of service, are lost.  A company can make a case to go into bankruptcy in any international jurisdiction, which means that this precedent has potential implications for all market participants. The proposed amendment from the Japanese FSA would serve to protect investors from such an eventuality.

Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), which oversees Hong Kong’s securities and futures markets, is understood to be planning to give the go-ahead for crypto derivative products to be offered to professional investors within the Chinese autonomous territory. Chinese English-language newspaper China Daily reported on June 4 that the proposed move forms part of Hong Kong’s efforts to expand its digital assets-related product offering in order to further bolster its position as a leading regional hub for the sector. Christopher Hui, Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, told the publication that the SFC will open up crypto derivatives trading to professional investors in the city “in an orderly, transparent and secure manner.”Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashBoosting liquidity to spot marketsChina Daily claimed that the SFC outlined that the crypto derivatives product will enable efficient risk transfers, while boosting the liquidity of the underlying spot markets. TokenInsight data suggests that the global crypto derivatives market has reached $21 trillion in trading volume over the course of Q1 2025. By comparison, derivatives trading dwarfs spot trading, given that spot trading weighed in at just $4.6 trillion over the same period. Liquidity in the underlying spot markets can be enhanced by a broadening of crypto derivatives product offerings in instances where digital assets are traded for immediate payment and delivery. Their availability will also appeal to professional traders and investors who need access to derivatives as part of their overall strategies in order to hedge positions and add leverage when required. Industry interestReaction to news of the Hong Kong SFC’s plans has largely been positive. Back in February, Jean-David Péquignot, chief commercial officer (CCO) with the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange Deribit, told the South China Morning Post that opening up availability of crypto derivatives products was the one item missing from Hong Kong’s push towards development as a hub for the digital assets sector. At the time, he stated:“Hong Kong is this central financial hub in the world and a big one in Asia. If regulators can solve the derivatives piece, it is a place where we love to be.” On that basis, Péquignot suggested that Deribit, headquartered in Dubai, would be interested in establishing itself in Hong Kong, suggesting that “Asia is a big market for derivatives.” He added:“We want to be in Asia. We just need to find the right place and time to engage with regulators and get a regulatory framework to work with.” The company’s acquisition by Coinbase was announced last month for $2.9 billion. Regulatory approach questionedWhile many see the move towards the approval of crypto derivatives in Hong Kong as bullish, not everyone perceives the regulator’s approach in this instance to be positive. Pseudonymous crypto trader “Pickle Cat” outlined on X that “opening crypto derivatives only to 'professional investors' isn’t progress.”  The trader points out that good regulation would concentrate on controlling issuance and not circulation. Suggesting that the SFC has missed the point in its approach, the trader claims that the regulator would serve the crypto derivatives market best by verifying what backs such products while not restricting how such tokens move.