3AC liquidators estimate 46% recovery while BVI court freezes $1B

BOK Staffers Assess Crypto Market Vulnerabilities and Their ImplicationsOn Thursday, the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) staff members published an assessment of the vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market and their potential implications. Here is the summary of the report.Photo by D Tan on Unsplash2022 crypto winterThroughout 2022, the worldwide crypto market faced a series of adverse occurrences, such as significant drops in the prices of major crypto-assets and the collapse of prominent crypto companies. These events shed light on the vulnerabilities that had accumulated during the rapid growth of the market.The first major event occurred in May 2022 when the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD experienced a sharp decline, resulting in substantial losses and bankruptcies for numerous retail investors and crypto firms. This incident significantly eroded confidence in the overall crypto market. The subsequent bankruptcies of prominent crypto lender Celsius and hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) further highlighted the realization of risks commonly associated with traditional financial markets, such as multiple collateral loans and maturity and liquidity mismatches, within the crypto market.In November 2022, the well-known crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, demonstrating that the activities of a large crypto company can propagate risks through moral hazard and excessive profit-seeking behavior when it operates outside the realm of regulatory oversight.Similarities with TradFiThese negative events that unfolded in the global crypto market in 2022 share similarities with issues previously observed in financial markets, such as unsustainable business models, liquidity risk, leverage, and lack of transparency in financial conditions. These parallels suggest that if the crypto markets were subjected to comparable levels of regulation as traditional financial markets, it is plausible that the triggering of these risks could have been avoided altogether, or at the very least, the resulting damage could have been mitigated to some extent.Implications for the Korean marketAt present, it is deemed unlikely that events akin to those witnessed in overseas crypto markets will transpire in the Korean market. The Korean crypto-asset market has primarily evolved through exchanges, with limited influence from other enterprises such as crypto issuers and decentralized lending platforms. In addition, Korean crypto exchanges are subject to regulation under the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information. This mandates the separation of customer deposits from exchange assets and the strict management of custodial crypto-assets through secure wallets. Additionally, Korean exchanges are prohibited from listing their own tokens on their platforms.However, there remains a dearth of information regarding the business structures of crypto companies that offer services similar to those in the traditional financial industry. This lack of information poses challenges in accurately assessing risk and providing adequate investor protection. Meanwhile, there is a potential for a deeper integration between the crypto market and users’ daily lives, particularly through major technology companies, gaming companies, and security tokens.SuggestionsIt is vital to ensure that crypto-assets are regulated based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” through the ongoing development of crypto-asset-related legislation. The Financial Stability Board, an international body monitoring the global financial system, explained this principle in a 2022 paper: “Where crypto-assets and intermediaries perform an equivalent economic function to one performed by instruments and intermediaries of the traditional financial sector, they should be subject to equivalent regulation.”Additionally, it is necessary to stay aligned with major countries in terms of the speed and comprehensiveness of regulatory measures to prevent regulatory discrepancies across borders due to the global nature of crypto risks.Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of a close cooperation system between authorities. This collaborative effort should encompass various aspects, including monitoring, information gathering, and supervision of the crypto-asset market. Notably, the widespread adoption of stablecoins can affect the stability of the overall financial system, including monetary systems and payment and settlement systems. Hence, it is necessary to strengthen the involvement of central banks in the monitoring and supervision framework for crypto-assets, including stablecoins, as demonstrated by legislative approaches adopted by major economies like the EU. Furthermore, imposing disclosure requirements, external audits, and documentation submission obligations on crypto-asset operators is advisable.

Cryptocurrency Losses Surge to $686 Million in Q3The cryptocurrency industry has witnessed a turbulent third quarter, with losses surging to $686 million. This unsettling development marks the worst quarter of the year, contributing to $1.4 billion in total losses year-to-date.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashImmunefi reportThese alarming statistics have been unveiled in a report by Singapore-headquartered blockchain security firm Immunefi. According to the report, the number of crypto hacking incidents skyrocketed by 153% year-over-year in the third quarter, with 76 separate incidents recorded.This stands in stark contrast to the same period in 2022, which saw a mere 30 hacking incidents. Furthermore, the losses resulting from these incidents witnessed a 60% increase, surging from approximately $429 million in Q3 2022 to the current level of $685 million. This marks the highest loss recorded for the year.Devastating hacksOf these incidents, two major hacks targeting Mixin Network and Multichain were particularly devastating, accounting for nearly half of the total losses in the quarter at $326 million. The Mixin Network hack, attributed to North Korean-sponsored hackers known as the Lazarus Group, underscores the involvement of state-backed actors in crypto-related cybercrimes.The Lazarus Group’s fingerprints were also found in major hacks of cryptocurrency exchanges, including CoinEx, Alphapo, and Stake, as well as digital payments firm CoinsPaid. Web3 projects based in Japan have been particularly hard hit by the hacker group’s activities. The group was responsible for losses exceeding $200 million.An overwhelming majority of the total Q3 losses, approximately 97%, were attributed to hacking incidents, while frauds and scams constituted a mere 3%. Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols bore the brunt of the damage, with nearly $500 million lost, compared to over $185 million stolen from centralized exchanges and services. This highlights the vulnerability of DeFi platforms and the intricacies of smart contract code that underlie many of these applications.Among the targeted blockchains, Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Coinbase-incubated Base blockchain were the most prominent, with Ethereum being hit by 35 out of 82 chain losses. These platforms were singled out due to the substantial funds they held and the high level of activity on their networks.Greater recovery effortsThough the situation may appear bleak, there is a glimmer of hope in the form of recovery efforts. Immunefi reports an 8.9% recovery rate, with $61.2 million of stolen funds successfully reclaimed in six cases. Notably, Mixin Network recently introduced a $20 million “bug bounty” in a bid to incentivize the return of stolen funds, underscoring the cryptocurrency industry’s unwavering determination to combat these challenges.Immunefi itself has played a pivotal role in mitigating crypto-related risks, disbursing over $80 million in bounties and safeguarding more than $25 billion in user funds across various protocols. The company’s recent launch of on-chain vaults represents a significant step toward decentralizing its bug bounty platform, further fortifying security within the crypto ecosystem.

The Current Status of Crypto in AsiaWith the United States having taken a very harsh line relative to cryptocurrency of late, there has been a lot of chatter surrounding the likelihood of Asia driving crypto forward. With that in mind, we’ve taken a look at the state of crypto in a number of Asian countries.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsJapanJapan is among the most crypto-friendly developed nations globally, having acknowledged Bitcoin as a legal payment mode and regulated crypto exchanges in 2017. Bitflyer and Bitbank are among the crypto exchanges operating in Japan, which currently has over 23 authorized crypto exchanges.The country aims to balance consumer protection and innovation by requiring crypto exchanges to register with the FSA, comply with stringent rules on security, anti-money laundering, and reporting, undergo regular FSA audits and inspections, and be part of the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA) for self-regulation.Despite being regulated, Japan’s crypto market is lively, with the Yen ranking second for Bitcoin trading volume by currency. The country has a flourishing crypto community, including blockchain firm LayerX, which requires ChatGPT expertise. Japan is also exploring the potential of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and plans to launch a pilot program with private sector partners in 2023 to test their feasibility for various use cases, aligning with the country’s strict approach to crypto.Japan’s crypto taxation is unfavorable, with crypto gains taxed at the same rates as regular income, potentially reaching up to 55% for higher income brackets. However, Japan is one of the few countries with comprehensive guidelines on crypto taxation, with the NTA providing a detailed document that explains different types of transactions and their corresponding tax calculations.ChinaChina’s ban on crypto mining led to many miners moving their operations overseas or selling their equipment at a loss. However, China’s crypto-mining industry bounced back, with a 21% share of the global hash rate. While China has a competitive advantage in cheap electricity, regulatory risks remain.China’s digital yuan is a legal tender fully backed by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and pegged to the renminbi. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, it is not decentralized or anonymous but is monitored by the PBOC. Adoption has been slow despite various partnerships and pilot tests, including with WeChat Pay.China is working with other countries on the Multiple CBDC Bridge project to explore the feasibility of cross-border fund transfers among different currencies. Launching its own CBDC may allow China to reduce its reliance on the US dollar and increase its influence over global trade and monetary policy. However, the success of that endeavor is questionable.Hong KongHong Kong is a crypto-friendly jurisdiction that faces banking access and mainland influence challenges. Despite difficulties opening local bank accounts after the closure of two crypto-friendly banks, Hong Kong remains committed to fostering its fintech hub status.The government proposed allowing retail investors to trade cryptocurrencies and ETFs and reviewing property rights for tokenized assets while considering legalizing smart contracts. Crypto purchases for all citizens are due to be legalized in June 2023. These measures should attract more investors and businesses to the city’s crypto industry.Nonetheless, Hong Kong must overcome hurdles regarding banking access and regulatory uncertainty from mainland China to maintain its attractive status for crypto businesses and investors.SingaporeSingapore has a supportive crypto ecosystem and regulations with low tax rates, favorable policies, strong financial center reputation, and proximity to other Asian markets. Notable international crypto players with offices in Singapore include Coinbase, Crypto.com and Kraken.However, Singapore imposes strict rules on crypto service providers to prevent illicit activities, requiring digital payment token (DPT) services to obtain a license under the Payment Services Act or face fines and jail time. Singapore’s crypto industry also faces competition from other jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong and the UAE, offering tax incentives and favorable legal frameworks.IndiaIndia’s crypto industry faces uncertainties due to the lack of a clear regulatory framework and frequent changes in the government’s stance. Despite having a large tech-savvy population and an active crypto community, the industry struggles with regulatory compliance and legal risks. In 2018, the Reserve Bank of India’s ban on banking channels cut off many crypto businesses and users.The Supreme Court of India later overturned the ban, but draft bills to ban or regulate crypto have since been proposed without official introduction or passage. India recently imposed a preemptive ban on crypto advertising and sponsorships and is exploring the integration of a CBDC. India’s position on crypto leans toward the anti-crypto side, just short of an outright ban.For brevity, we’ve confined discussion to these five Asian venues. However, it would be remiss of us not to mention that Vietnam has one of the highest levels of crypto adoption in the world while having a crypto trading ban in place. Not so in South Korea where crypto trading is legal, with strict regulation having been put in place. Meanwhile, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved four cryptocurrencies as tradable assets, with crypto trading in the country having a legal status.It’s difficult to figure out precisely how crypto will develop geographically but it seems certain that its future will be molded to some extent in Asia.