Lotte’s NFT marketplace partners with upcycling brand NiUl for membership NFTs

The South Korean National Tax Service (NTS) is reportedly in the process of setting up virtual asset accounts for its district offices. This initiative is aimed at confiscating and liquidating the digital assets of individuals who fail to pay their taxes. This move comes after the creation of similar accounts by public prosecutors' offices, leading to speculation in the crypto industry that virtual asset accounts will soon be allowed for corporate entities as well.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsDirect confiscation of virtual assetsA report by the local news outlet Etoday today has revealed that each district office of the NTS is working towards establishing a virtual asset account. This development will empower the tax agency to directly sell virtual assets confiscated from tax delinquents. Previously, the NTS would freeze the accounts of overdue taxpayers at Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, compelling them to convert their assets into Korean won. These funds were then confiscated by the NTS. The new initiative is set to streamline the process, enabling the tax authority to directly confiscate virtual assets without the intermediary step of conversion to Korean won. Speaking about this development, an NTS officer said that as each district office director holds the authority to collect taxes from taxpayers with overdue payments, it's necessary for each office to have its own account. Prosecutors’ Offices’ Upbit and Bithumb accountsThe crypto industry views this development as a potential step towards allowing the creation of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities, starting with government agencies. In December, the prosecutors' offices established their entity accounts at major cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb. Since then, the prosecution has utilized these accounts to sell confiscated virtual assets, aiming to recover funds that had not been collected.  An official from a cryptocurrency exchange indicated that the South Korean government is currently focusing on allowing entities that serve the public good to own virtual asset accounts. This approach is seen as the starting point, with expectations that the trend will gain momentum in the future. The official added that it's rare for the government to provide blanket permissions from the outset, suggesting a gradual and cautious approach to the integration of virtual asset accounts.Money laundering concernsMeanwhile, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), along with other financial regulators, has remained silent on the matter of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities. This reticence stems from concerns with the financial authority that the introduction of corporate crypto accounts could potentially lead to money laundering and the creation of slush funds. An official from the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee said that they have not received any comments from the financial authority in response to inquiries about plans to allow such accounts for corporate entities. The current law doesn’t prohibit corporate entities from trading virtual assets. However, under the auspices of the financial authority, banks have refrained from offering real-name accounts to corporate entities. This policy has been a point of contention within the crypto industry. Advocates argue that allowing corporate accounts could mitigate issues of market manipulation and challenge the dominance of Upbit in the Korean cryptocurrency market.  The official from the cryptocurrency exchange pointed out that the financial authority does not have a clear legal basis for prohibiting the creation of corporate crypto accounts. They suggested that the regulator should develop clearer guidelines and enforce these rules for corporate entities. More serious discussions in AprilMore serious discussions about the introduction of corporate crypto accounts are anticipated to take place in April, following the conclusion of the general election. Last month, the main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, made election promises to open the crypto market to institutional investors. Meanwhile, the ruling People Power Party has been quietly deliberating on virtual asset policy. Despite these political movements, earlier reports indicate a disconnect between the political parties' efforts to relax crypto regulations and the financial regulator's stance. Meanwhile, Hwang Seok-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security, expects to see a conclusion on the permission of corporate crypto trading by the end of this year. He said that there has been ongoing discussion about the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and that allowing the trading of such funds requires the ownership of virtual assets by institutions. 

While South Korea’s central bank has opted not to accumulate Bitcoin (BTC) at a nation-state level, North Korea has become a major holder of the leading crypto asset, albeit in a very unconventional way. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) is believed to currently be in possession of 13,518 BTC. That’s according to data compiled by the blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence. Arkham has labeled the holding as belonging to the notorious North Korean hacking organization Lazarus Group. It’s been alleged by many observers over recent years that Lazarus is controlled by the North Korean government. Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on UnsplashOn this basis, it would appear that North Korea now has a larger Bitcoin holding than the Bitcoin-friendly jurisdictions of Bhutan and El Salvador. The Kingdom of Bhutan holds 10,635 BTC through Druk Holdings and Investments (DHI), the commercial arm of the Royal Government of Bhutan.  Meanwhile, El Salvador holds 6,119 BTC. Bhutan has been accumulating Bitcoin as a consequence of Bitcoin mining activity carried out by the government in partnership with Singapore-based Bitcoin mining firm Bitdeer and others within the Asian country over recent years. El Salvador made a commitment to buy Bitcoin on an ongoing basis following its recognition of the digital asset as legal tender back in 2021. Based on Bitcoin pricing at the time of writing, Arkham’s data suggests that North Korea currently holds Bitcoin with an overall value of around $1.14 billion. It’s believed that North Korea’s overall holdings have been bumped up recently following a $1.4 billion hack of global crypto exchange Bybit last month. According to crypto data analysis firm Coin Metrics, the hack stands as one of the largest of all time.  Arkham’s data suggests that North Korea now has the third largest nation-state holding of Bitcoin, with the U.S. in first place, with 198,109 BTC, and the UK next with a holding of 61,245 BTC. Besides Bitcoin, the Lazarus Group is understood to be sitting on ETH, BNB, DAI and BUSD worth in the region of $30 million. In the immediate aftermath of the hack, the hackers moved to swap out some of the stolen Ether (ETH) for Bitcoin via the THORChain decentralized liquidity protocol. South Korea not building Bitcoin reserveWhile North Korea appears to have accumulated Bitcoin at the nation-state level through nefarious means, the Republic of Korea’s (South Korea) central bank has given an indication that it currently has no plans to accumulate Bitcoin.  According to a recent local media report, the Bank of Korea (BOK) responded in writing to a query from a Korean parliamentarian, outlining that there is no plan currently to develop a Bitcoin reserve or to stockpile Bitcoin at a national level.  The BOK is understood to have cited Bitcoin’s price volatility as a major concern. Additionally, the central bank outlined that Bitcoin doesn’t conform to the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) guidelines relative to foreign exchange reserve management.

Zipmex, the Asian digital asset exchange, faces another setback as the Securities and Exchange Commission Board of Thailand (SEC Board) moves to recommend the revocation of its digital asset business license. This decision, announced last week, marks the latest in a series of challenges for the exchange, which has struggled to navigate the complexities of the crypto market's downturn.Photo by Oleksandr P on PexelsCapital requirements failureThe SEC's recommendation stems from Zipmex's failure to meet the increased net capital requirement and address deficiencies in its personnel and management structure. These shortcomings were deemed unacceptable by the regulatory body, prompting a 15-day ultimatum issued on Feb. 1. Earlier this month, the Commission ordered a halt to Zipmex operations, enforcing a temporary suspension until such time as the company had improved its financial position and applied needed changes to its management structure.Despite this window for compliance, Zipmex fell short of meeting the specified conditions, leading to the current proposal for license revocation and the imposition of stringent regulatory measures on Thailand's digital asset exchanges. Business suspension extensionDuring a meeting on Feb. 21, the SEC further resolved to extend Zipmex's business suspension, initiated on Feb. 1, and allowed clients to request asset returns on the exchange until March 11. Any unclaimed assets after this date will be required to be placed in a "trusted and secured system," with Zipmex obligated to report this to the SEC. Notably, even after the potential revocation of its license, Zipmex will retain its status as a limited company, subject to associated rights, responsibilities and liabilities, including the possibility of legal action. Zipmex's woes trace back to 2022 when it faced significant challenges due to exposure to failed crypto lender Babel Finance. In July of that year, the exchange suspended withdrawals for weeks due to concerns over its ties to crypto lenders Babel and Celsius, both facing financial distress. Although access to Trade Wallets was restored after three days, Z Wallets remained inaccessible into the following year. Failed Coinbase and V Ventures dealsIn the midst of its troubles, Zipmex attracted interest from Coinbase, albeit without success. While Coinbase made a strategic investment in Zipmex, the acquisition attempt did not materialize as initially intended. Furthermore, Zipmex's financial struggles led it to file for debt relief in Singapore in July 2022, further complicating its position in the market. The exchange's regulatory challenges continued as it faced scrutiny from the SEC regarding compliance with the Digital Assets Act. Despite attempts to secure acquisition deals, such as the proposed acquisition by Thai investor V Ventures, Zipmex has been unable to alleviate regulatory concerns or stabilize its operations effectively. Since obtaining its license from the SEC in January 2020, Zipmex has operated in Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and Australia. However, its inability to address regulatory requirements and financial challenges has cast doubt on its future viability in these markets.  In November of last year, the company itself announced a temporary cessation of trading in Thailand while it worked towards becoming compliant within that jurisdiction. Earlier this month, Thailand’s SEC took legal action against Akarlap Yimwilai, the former CEO of Zipmex Thailand.