Indonesia Set to Launch National Cryptocurrency Exchange in July

Mosca, a cash-to-crypto exchange headquartered at the Moscow International Business Center, was subject to a raid carried out by the Russian authorities on April 23. The raid occurred in the immediate aftermath of a call from a member of the commission of the Public Chamber (OP) of the Russian Federation to ban crypto exchanges from facilitating the purchase of cryptocurrencies using cash.Photo by Egor Filin on UnsplashInvestigating fraudWhile attending the Blockchain Life 2025 event in Moscow, Mosca’s Head of Development, Dmitry Titarenko, confirmed to Cointelegraph that the rationale provided for the raid was that it was in connection with fraud perpetrated by one of its platform users. Titarenko added: “Law enforcement agencies have carried out a standard procedure of checking our customer data.” The raid occurred during the company’s attendance at the Blockchain Life conference. Mosca was a key conference participant, having established two stands at the event and winning an award for the best crypto exchange service. Reporting on the raid, local media outlet Baza said that it had been carried out in relation to fraud perpetrated against the former head of the Samara Region Development Corporation, Olga Serova. It explained that Serova had been conned into handing over 350 million rubles ($4.24 million) and $800,000 to the scammers.  Seven arrestsShe withdrew these funds from her bank at the end of last year, despite bank officials having tried to persuade her against the withdrawal for this purpose. The news outlet added that to date, seven people have been arrested in connection with the alleged fraud. The Mosca exchange service may be proving to be attractive to scammers as the platform allows users to buy up to 100,000 USDT per day using cash. Titarenko couldn’t confirm that the raid was carried out in connection with the Serova fraud case. He said that “maybe it was [in relation to] another client.”The exchange executive also confirmed that the company had been in the process of putting in place more resources to carry out anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks, together with a blacklisting system related to suspicious platform users. Cash-to-crypto ban proposalThe raid occurred within 24 hours of Yevgeny Masharov, a member of the commission of the Public Chamber (OP) of the Russian Federation, putting forward a proposal to ban crypto exchanges from receiving cash, making services like Mosca’s cash-to-crypto exchange illegal. According to state-owned Russian news agency TASS, Masharov said that such a move would “cause a large-scale blow to scammers, because it’s no secret that telephone scammers use crypto exchangers to withdraw cash.”Sergey Mendeleev, a well-known figure within crypto circles in Russia, told attendees at the Blockchain Life conference that such a cash-to-crypto ban would be an unwelcome development for the sector. If such a ban were to materialize, Mendeleev suggested that it would be an indication that the Russian authorities were turning away from the greater development of cryptocurrency in Russia. Last week, it emerged that Russia’s Ministry of Finance, in collaboration with the country’s central bank, plans to launch a crypto exchange for qualified investors. The central bank also confirmed plans to launch a digital ruble payment network in 2026.

Legal Process Continues Following Crypto.com Transfer MishapJatinder Singh, a customer of Singapore-headquartered Crypto.com is expected to face a plea trial next month in the wake of an errant transfer that occurred on the platform over two years ago.In 2021, Crypto.com inadvertently transferred over $10 million into Thevamanogari Manivel’s Commonwealth Bank account in Australia. Remarkably, this substantial error went unnoticed by Crypto.com for seven months until it was uncovered during an audit.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash18-month sentenceManivel, a 41-year-old disability support worker, was arrested at Melbourne airport while attempting to board a plane to Malaysia in March 2022. She was holding a one-way ticket and nearly $11,000 in cash. Her recent sentencing, following her guilty plea for recklessly dealing with the proceeds of the crime, has garnered significant attention.The court imposed an 18-month community corrections order, including six months of intensive compliance and unpaid community work. This punishment was in addition to the 209 days Manivel had already spent in custody.Embarrassing errorCrypto.com’s multimillion-dollar mistake made headlines globally when it came to light during legal proceedings aimed at freezing Manivel’s assets. This incident occurred during a period of heightened uncertainty in the cryptocurrency market, mere months before the highly publicized collapse of rival FTX.In 2018, Manivel met Jatinder Singh, who became her partner and shared her interest in cryptocurrency investments. Singh attempted to make a payment using Manivel’s bank account on Crypto.com but encountered a rejection due to a name mismatch. A processing error, however, led to a massive transfer of $10.47 million into Manivel’s account.Realizing the overpayment, Singh advised Manivel to move the funds to a joint Westpac account. Between the transfer and Manivel’s arrest, the money was used to purchase four houses, vehicles, art, and furniture, and $4 million was sent to an overseas account.Crypto.com discovered the error during an audit in December 2021 and initiated efforts to reclaim the funds from Commonwealth Bank. In January 2022, the bank contacted Manivel multiple times, seeking the return of the money. Manivel, initially regarding these communications as scam attempts, remained unaware of the gravity of the situation. She later informed the police that Singh had claimed to win the money in a Crypto.com competition.Theft chargesWith Manivel having been dealt with by the courts, attention now turns to Singh, who faces charges of theft and is scheduled for a plea hearing on October 23.In response to this incident, Crypto.com highlighted its commitment to enhancing internal processes to ensure security and compliance in financial services. This includes updates to their refund and withdrawal systems to prevent such occurrences in the future.The wayward transfer may have left Crypto.com with egg on its face, but the firm has been redeeming itself via other endeavors, including the roll-out of the use of AI on its platform. On the regulatory front, the company has been working diligently towards compliance in the Spanish market, having already acquired trading licenses in Dubai and its home market of Singapore.This case serves as a cautionary tale of the unexpected consequences that can arise in crypto. Such elementary mistakes will not provide confidence to service users. The saga lays down a marker for a need for greater professionalism in the sector.

A settlement agreement between failed crypto lender BlockFi and bankrupt Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has received approval from a U.S. judge. However, the specifics of the settlement remain sealed, citing concerns raised by yet another failed crypto platform, FTX. Dispute resolvedDuring a hearing on Feb. 6, New Jersey Bankruptcy Court Judge Michael Kaplan resolved the dispute, which saw BlockFi claiming $129 million owed by 3AC, while the Singapore-based firm contended that BlockFi owed it $280 million. Judge Kaplan's decision to keep the settlement agreement sealed stemmed from a perspective that unsealing it would be counterintuitive. BlockFi had filed a motion to seal the settlement terms last month. The U.S. Trustee objected to the seal, asserting that the debtors hadn't provided sufficient justification for sealing the agreement.Photo by mk. s on UnsplashSensitive settlement termsBlockFi justified the need for confidentiality, citing the sensitive commercial nature of the terms, which could potentially impact ongoing litigation involving FTX. The approval of the settlement now paves the way for BlockFi to proceed with distributions from the lending estate to its 100,000 creditors, with the firm owing up to $10 billion. Central to the dispute were preferential payments, transactions made just before bankruptcy that could have given the recipient more than they would have received through court proceedings. The resolution of counterclaims between BlockFi and 3AC follows mediation ordered by Judge Kaplan in October, likely culminating from a two-day hearing starting on Jan. 5 aimed at resolving the matter conclusively. This settlement follows another agreement between 3AC and Genesis, settling $1 billion in claims by 3AC. The company filed for bankruptcy in July 2022, attributing the extreme fluctuations in cryptocurrency markets as the reason for its collapse. Projected 46% 3AC creditor recoveryAccording to a December report to creditors by Teneo, it's estimated that 3AC creditors will receive approximately 45.74% of their claims from the bankrupt estate. As of Dec. 18, 2023, 3AC's assets were valued at $1.16 billion, while recognized claims for distribution stood at $2.7 billion. In an ongoing effort to secure 3AC's assets, a British Virgin Islands (BVI) court froze $1 billion in assets belonging to 3AC's founders, amid the liquidation process. This move is part of a broader strategy to seek recoveries from the founders and Kelly Chen, wife of one of the co-founders. 154 claims totaling $3.4 billion were filed against the 3AC estate, with $200 million not admitted for distribution and $322 million rejected or expected to be rejected. Additionally, claims worth $76 million are currently under dispute. BlockFi, along with eight affiliates, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2022. The firm cited significant exposure, including obligations owed to BlockFi by FTX-linked hedge fund Alameda Research, assets on the FTX platform and an undrawn credit line from FTX. 3AC’s collapse in June 2022, followed by FTX's downfall, led to BlockFi's bankruptcy filing in late November 2022. In a separate development, OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims platform launched by 3AC co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, announced its cessation of operations, with plans to shut down by Feb. 14.