Binance Headlines List of Japan FSA Warning Letter Recipients

Standard Chartered Muscling Into Asian Crypto SpaceUK banking giant Standard Chartered is making a concerted foray into the Asian crypto sector through its Singapore-based subsidiary, Standard Chartered Ventures.Photo by Kirill Petropavlov on UnsplashTargeting institutional businessThat’s according to a report by Nikkei Asia on Tuesday. It’s believed that the company is positioning itself as a trusted choice for institutional cryptocurrency clients amid the backdrop of digital token price volatility and recent upheavals in the industry. The move will pit the British bank directly against global crypto exchange Binance in key Asian markets, specifically Singapore and Japan.Rene Michau, the Global Head of Digital Assets at Standard Chartered, emphasized what he considers to be the bank’s unique advantage in the digital asset space, stating:“As regulated banks, we have a fairly deep infrastructure around risk, conduct compliance, and the activities that go along with crypto assets.”This solid infrastructure includes established risk frameworks, governance structures, and compliance tools that Standard Chartered is keen to bring into the cryptocurrency sphere, thus making it an attractive option for its clients.Zodia Custody and Zodia MarketsStandard Chartered’s substantial involvement in the cryptocurrency market is channeled through its majority ownership of Zodia Custody, responsible for safeguarding digital assets, and Zodia Markets, a crypto exchange tailored for institutional clients.Both entities have been making significant progress in bringing their offerings to market in recent months. Zodia Custody recently launched its services in Singapore, offering a secure solution for financial institutions to manage their crypto holdings. Last month it launched a crypto staking product targeted at institutional clients.In the same month, Zodia Markets achieved in-principle approval to trade as a broker-dealer in the United Arab Emirates. Zodia Custody has also been successful in the UAE, launching its crypto custodian service in Dubai in May.Japan and SingaporeThis concerted effort by Standard Chartered follows a broader trend where traditional financial institutions, such as DBS Group Holdings in Singapore, are entering the cryptocurrency market, capitalizing on the challenges faced by younger crypto players in proving their credibility.Binance rebranded its Binance Custody unit as Ceffu and expanded its offerings for corporate customers in Singapore. While Binance asserts the independence of Ceffu, the exact nature of their capital relationship remains undisclosed.A parallel competition is unfolding in Japan, where Binance Japan has entered the market and Standard Chartered’s Zodia Custody has formed a joint venture with SBI Digital Asset Holdings, targeting institutional clients.While Standard Chartered has achieved a lot through its crypto-focused subsidiaries in a short space of time, there’s always room for improvement. In June, Hong Kong’s banking regulator singled out Standard Chartered alongside HSBC, appealing to both banking groups to make greater efforts to bank crypto clients within the Chinese autonomous territory, as it looks to compete with Singapore in becoming a regional crypto hub.The cryptocurrency sector has witnessed increased scrutiny as virtual currencies like Bitcoin and Ether have gained popularity. The rise of digital token exchanges, each vying for custody of assets belonging to investors who have embraced cryptocurrencies, has sparked concerns about corporate governance and security.Giants in traditional finance, like Standard Chartered, are stepping in to offer institutional investors a safer path to engage with virtual assets while leveraging the trust associated with established brands.

HK Regulators Facilitate Dialogue between Banks and Crypto EnterprisesIn a recent column, Arthur Yuen, Deputy CEO at the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), stated that the HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) will jointly convene a meeting on Friday to share opinions on providing banking services to virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Proportionate CDD measuresYuen said that banks should “differentiate the risk levels of customers and apply proportionate CDD [customer due diligence] measures,” and “refrain from adopting a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to reject account opening applications.” To address misconceptions about CDD, the HKMA issued a circular on Thursday, offering further clarification and sharing notable cases and best practices.The HKMA called on banks to enhance employee training on account opening procedures and create task forces to help companies seize new business opportunities. The HKMA plans to actively take part in developing and introducing international standards, and provide guidance and support for banks to adopt appropriate anti-money laundering measures.SFC’s guidelines in MayMeanwhile, SFC CEO Julia Leung said in a discussion with Bloomberg that the SFC will issue virtual asset guidelines in May.Reactions on TwitterIn his tweet, Justin Sun, the founder of blockchain DAO ecosystem Tron, hinted at the potential development of a Tron-based stablecoin in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Innovation Encryption Fund (HKIEF), an investor in blockchain projects, also took to Twitter to predict the details of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in the city.According to HKIEF, USDT and USDC will be classified as security tokens, while BTC and ETH won’t be deemed securities. Exchanges trading non-security tokens will need both a VASP license and a trust license. Hong Kong-based virtual asset exchanges will be required to obtain a full license by May 31, 2024.

South Korean financial regulators have decided, at least for the time being, to maintain the current policy requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to partner with only one bank, according to a report from the Seoul Economic Daily.Photo by POURIA 🦋 on UnsplashDominance and money laundering concernsA government official cited concerns that allowing multiple banking relationships could potentially strengthen market dominance by leading platforms and increase money laundering risks. Regulators plan to revisit the issue after monitoring new developments following upcoming regulations that will permit institutional participation in the crypto market. This decision runs counter to a recent proposal put forward by the People Power Party (PPP) ahead of the presidential election that seeks to eliminate the one-bank-per-exchange requirement. Bizwatch reported that while the crypto industry initially supported the removal of this restriction unanimously, opinions have recently diverged among market participants. Divided industryMajor exchanges offering Korean won-based trading are mostly against the potential policy change. Except for Upbit, the country's largest platform, competitors express concern that modifying the rules could weaken their existing banking relationships if more financial institutions choose to partner with the market leader. Conversely, crypto-only exchanges, which cannot offer Korean won trading services, generally favor eliminating banking restrictions. These platforms believe relaxed regulations could create more opportunities to establish banking partnerships. Under current rules, virtual asset service providers must secure real-name accounts from a local bank to offer Korean won trading, placing those without such accounts at a competitive disadvantage. Banks also want changeKorean commercial banks align with crypto-only exchanges in supporting the easing of banking regulations. Jung Jin-wan, CEO of key financial institution Woori Bank, recently called for allowing multiple banks to serve individual crypto exchanges. He argues that the current one-bank-per-exchange system not only undermines systemic stability but also limits customer choice. While an official from a crypto-to-fiat exchange acknowledged the need for eventual reform of the one-bank-per-exchange system to improve customer options and market development, they also pointed out that industry stakeholders hold different views depending on their position in the market. The official said that dominant platforms perceive minimal practical benefits from permitting multiple banking relationships.