CFX surges as Conflux teases yuan-pegged stablecoin & 3.0 launch

The Need for Crypto Regulation Improvements in South KoreaAlthough the cryptocurrency market entered a bearish phase last year, there are prospects for growth as regulatory inclusion and market transparency begin to improve. However, the domestic market is currently hindered by deepening monopolies and inadequate support policies, limiting the development of the industry, said Kim Jin-won, Executive Director of Korean crypto exchange COREDAX, during a conference last Friday in Seoul.The conference, hosted by the Federation of Korean Industries, invited experts to discuss the oncoming era of convergence and the current status and challenges of virtual asset legislation in South Korea, as well as the necessary steps for improving regulations on virtual assets.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashGlobal decentralization trendsOverseas, various decentralized projects, such as the integration of blockchain technology into traditional financial markets, have led to the growth of related markets such as Bitcoin futures, decentralized finance (DeFi), over-the-counter (OTC) trading, custodial services, the metaverse, and Web3. However, in Korea, the lack of clear guidance or policy management for crypto businesses and services prevents the market from thriving.Countries like the US and Japan as well as the European Union (EU) are overhauling regulations in order to dominate the global industry and market through blockchain technology and virtual assets. Kim emphasized that Korea also needs to incorporate such flexible regulatory improvements considering the likely possibility that various industries are going to thrive on crypto-related businesses.Challenging existing regulations and calls for clarityHe started off by stating that the implicit regulation known as the “One Exchange, One Bank” principle was created for administrative convenience and is acting as a barrier to entry into the crypto industry. He argued that it is a discriminatory regulation, especially considering the fact that securities firms choose to operate stock trading accounts through multiple banks.Regarding the standards for issuing bank accounts under real names, which will be determined by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), he argued that they are difficult to comply with, even for banks that already have contracts with crypto exchanges. He called for the FIU to express a clear stance on the retroactive application of these standards to avoid potential consequences such as barriers to market entry for late-movers.“The crypto market — including DeFi, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), artificial intelligence (AI), the metaverse, and Web3 — is growing at an annual average rate of 12.8%, and is expected to reach a scale of $4.9 billion by 2030,” he said. “When combined with Web3 innovation, the metaverse will evolve into a 3D platform business that incorporates the use of payment methods, NFTs, and virtual assets.”Promoting innovation in the crypto industryTo foster such industry growth, it is necessary to actively explore new types of services as well as potential challenges. Innovative financial services should also be designated or promoted through regulatory sandboxes. The regulatory sandbox is a system run by the Korean government that exempts or suspends existing regulations for a designated amount of time for companies releasing new products and services and regulates them post-mortem if there is a problem.Kim went on to propose specific measures such as negative regulations — regulations that outline what is prohibited by law while allowing everything else — to promote new industries. He also suggested that banks should be allowed to engage in custodial services for virtual assets.Furthermore, he highlighted the need for cooperation between payment companies and crypto firms. “Payment service providers like Visa and Mastercard are already collaborating with global crypto exchanges to incorporate virtual assets into their businesses,” he said. “With companies like Tesla, eBay, and more adopting or considering adopting cryptocurrency as a payment method, we must consider allowing collaborations between domestic credit card companies, payment gateway companies, and crypto firms.”He also urged for the early approval of initial exchange offerings (IEOs) to stimulate the crypto market and advocated for support policies for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). He cited examples such as brokering transactions for security tokens, allowing OTC trading, requesting security token issuance assessments through system integration with account management agencies, and permitting outsourcing for issuance operations.

Korean Financial Regulator to Inspect Non-Fiat Crypto Trading PlatformThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to launch a comprehensive inspection on crypto trading platform Fobl (previously known as Foblgate) from March 11.©Pexels/김 대정Unlike other major Korean crypto exchanges, such as Upbit or Bithumb, which allow trading between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, Fobl only offers trading between cryptocurrencies.Inspection on non-fiat exchangesThe FIU’s inspection of Fobl is a follow-up to the regulator’s inspection of GDAC, another Korean non-fiat crypto exchange. This suggests that the FIU will focus on inspecting non-fiat exchanges in the first half of this year.Many in the cryptocurrency industry have been paying attention to the FIU’s move after its first inspection of GDAC, as it could signal the direction in which the regulator would take. Earlier this year, the FIU announced that it would conduct inspections not only on non-fiat crypto exchanges but also on wallet solutions, custodians, and staking service providers. It is known that the FIU has been reviewing anti-money laundering (AML) systems and asset management statuses of these crypto enterprises.Fobl’s possible addition of fiat tradingThe Korean crypto industry suspects Fobl might transform itself into a fiat crypto exchange, considering the FIU’s notice that it will prioritize examining non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to support fiat trading.Fobl CEO’s take on the marketPrior to this news, Fobl CEO Ahn Hyun-joon said in a recent interview with Etnews that the platform is in talks with multiple banks to acquire real-name bank accounts and is complying with all the regulations required by the authorities. During the interview, he also raised concerns about the uncertainty that faces non-fiat crypto trading platforms, pointing out that 97% of the crypto trading in Korea is being carried out in crypto exchanges that support trading of Korean won.In Korea, the financial regulator requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) offering trading in Korean won to hold real-name registered accounts at domestic banks as a measure to prevent money laundering.

Bgin Blockchain Limited, a crypto mining equipment manufacturer headquartered in Singapore, filed documentation last Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with a view towards launching an initial public offering (IPO) in the U.S. The Feb. 21 filing, a Form F-1 registration statement, outlines that the company wishes to go forward with the IPO after the effective date of the filing has been established. Bgin identified itself as an “emerging growth company.”  The registration statement was filed on behalf of Bgin by Hunter Taubman Fischer & Li LLC, in conjunction with the underwriters represented by Robinson & Cole LLP. It proposes to offer the U.S. investing public 59.54 million Class A ordinary shares and 15.69 million Class B shares. As part of its plan, Class A shares would be listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange using “BGIN” as the ticker symbol.Photo by Leslie Lopez Holder on Unsplash$50 million raiseIn a statement published on Renaissance Capital's website, the independent investment bank outlined that Bgin is seeking to raise $50 million in capital through the IPO.  It’s understood that funds raised by way of the IPO will be utilized to ramp up research and development efforts. The bookrunners, responsible for managing the IPO, are Chardan Capital Markets and The Benchmark Company. As yet, no information has been provided with regard to how Bgin will price its share offering. Renaissance described Bgin as a digital asset technology company “with proprietary cryptocurrency mining technologies and a strategic focus on alternative cryptocurrencies.”  The company, founded in 2019, focuses on the design, manufacture and distribution of mining equipment relative to Kaspa (KAS), Alephium (ALPH) and Radiant (RXD) blockchain networks. Bgin supplies 8nm and 12nm ASIC chips dedicated to these alternative blockchain networks, which all depend on the use of a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism. Additionally, Bgin mines cryptocurrency itself while providing a hosting service for crypto mining, with facilities in the U.S. and Hong Kong. It hosts 4,020 mining rigs for customers, with 3,330 of these located within facilities in Iowa and Nebraska.  Across various subsidiaries Bgin manages 33,862 active mining rigs in the U.S. within its own mining operations. And additional 12,000 non-operational rigs are currently in storage facilities in the U.S. and Hong Kong. Over a 12-month period ending on June 30, 2024, the company recorded revenues of $392 million. In 2023, the firm recorded sales of 68,000 mining rigs. In H1 2024, the company sold over 47,000 mining machines. The filing disclosed that the company’s Hong Kong subsidiary was responsible for considerable crypto mining facilities in mainland China prior to China deeming the activity to be illegal in 2021. Providing full disclosure in the lead-up to its IPO, the firm warned that it continued to operate crypto mining facilities in China for a number of months in violation of that law. It identifies this item as a risk factor as potentially, the firm could be penalized and fined.