TRES secures $11M funding to expand multi-chain tax reporting

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.

Hong Kong Adapts Crypto Regulations to Broaden Market AccessHong Kong’s financial regulator has taken a further regulatory step in its evolving stance on cryptocurrency trading, widening the scope of retail access to digital assets through intermediaries.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashResponding to growing demandThe move follows a surge in interest in spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and recent investigations into the unlicensed operations of the JPEX exchange. In a circular published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on Friday, the regulator explained that the policy shift was prompted by changing market dynamics and growing inquiries from the industry.The new guidelines aim to extend access to a broader clientele and facilitate the direct deposit and withdrawal of virtual assets through intermediaries, all while maintaining stringent safeguards. The circular states:”The policy is updated in light of the latest market developments and enquiries from the industry seeking to further expand retail access through intermediaries and to allow investors to directly deposit and withdraw virtual assets to/from intermediaries with appropriate safeguards.”Cautionary notesDespite this welcome expansion, there are a couple of cautionary notes included within the circular. Hong Kong remains circumspect about overseas virtual asset (VA) products, deeming them “complex” and, as a result, riskier. The circular emphasizes that “VA-related products considered complex should only be offered to professional investors.” For instance, an overseas VA non-derivative ETF is likely to fall into this category.The other condition pertains to potential clients, who will be required to undergo a one-off test to assess their knowledge of investing and ensure they possess the financial wherewithal to manage the risks associated with virtual asset trading. Furthermore, intermediaries must furnish clients with comprehensive risk disclosure statements.The regulator also places an onus on the intermediary to set a limit for each retail client, to ensure that a retail client’s exposure to virtual assets is reasonable. The circular outlines that deposit and withdrawal of client funds should only happen through the use of segregated funding accounts on an SFC-licensed platform.Crypto sector aspirationsThis shift in regulation underscores Hong Kong’s ongoing aspirations to solidify its position as a hub for virtual assets. The territory embarked on a new regulatory regime in June, enabling applications for crypto trading platform licenses. By August, the first batch of licenses was granted, allowing exchanges to cater to retail customers. This marked a notable turnaround from Hong Kong’s prior 18 months of skepticism and hostility toward the cryptocurrency sector.The timing of these regulatory changes coincides with surging interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs, with JPMorgan even suggesting that approval in the US could materialize within months. This shift in regulatory perspective in Hong Kong also follows the investigation and accusations made against the JPEX exchange for conducting unlicensed operations, leading to arrests and the promise to disclose details of licensed applicants. The JPEX scandal has also dampened public confidence in crypto in Hong Kong more recently.Hong Kong is adapting its crypto regulations to be more inclusive while maintaining a cautious approach toward complex overseas virtual asset products. This regulatory shift underscores the region’s determination to foster its status as a leading hub for virtual assets, following a change of heart from its previous stance of skepticism and reluctance towards the crypto industry.

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.