XPLA and PERPLAY join forces to bolster rewarding mechanism to Web3 games

$100M Pyramid Scheme Linked to Prominent Chinese Filecoin ProjectA courtroom showdown currently playing out in the People’s Court of Pingnan County in northeastern Fujian province in China is laying bare an intricate pyramid scheme entwined with one of China’s flagship ventures in the Filecoin ecosystem.The lawsuit thrusts five defendants into the spotlight, alleging their orchestration of an expansive pyramid scheme under the guise of their enterprise, Shenzhen Space-Time Cloud Company. The operation is purported to have siphoned off millions of dollars, leaving in its wake a trail of financial wreckage.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashAggressive project marketingAccording to a local media report published on Monday, the saga began in June 2018 when Lai Mouhang and Lai Moujun established the Space-Time Cloud Company. Subsequently, co-defendants Hu and Liang joined the ranks in the following months. However, it wasn’t until September 2019 that Lai Mouhang escalated the company’s operations, leveraging the ipfs.cn domain to aggressively market and peddle investments linked to distributed storage technology and Filecoin’s intricate economic model.Central to Filecoin’s model is its block reward system, where miners validating new blocks receive Filecoin tokens (FIL) as a reward. In a stunning revelation, the prosecution claims that Lai Mouhang and his accomplices crafted a scheme mirroring this economic structure.Their brainchild, the filpool.io platform, served as a conduit for joint mining, masquerading as a storage server vending operation for FIL mining. This platform, intrinsically linked to Space-Time Cloud Company, allegedly formed the epicenter of the defendants’ fraudulent maneuvers.Almost 60,000 usersThe gravity of the scheme becomes evident when considering the staggering numbers: a reported 57,122 members registered on the filpool.io platform and an additional 143 partners on the bpool.io platform, a sibling project of Space-Time Cloud Company. These platforms collectively amassed a jaw-dropping RMB 607 million ($83 million), alongside RMB 62 million in diverse cryptocurrencies.The modus operandi of the defendants was rooted in enticing participants with rosy prospects of exponential profits. By acquiring a minimum of 8 terabytes of cloud computing power, individuals could attain bronze membership status or higher, unlocking the ability to further recruit participants. Unsurprisingly, the magnitude of returns correlated directly with the size of investments and the recruitment spree — classic hallmarks of a pyramid scheme.The prosecution contends that the defendants exploited these platforms as bait for participants, perpetuating the myth of high returns. This alleged deception led to substantial financial losses for many unsuspecting victims. Furthermore, these actions purportedly sowed discord and upheaval in both economic and social spheres, potentially transgressing criminal law boundaries.As the investigation into this convoluted case unfurls, its implications resonate far beyond China’s territorial confines. The intertwining of cryptocurrency, blockchain, and pyramid schemes punctuates the ever-evolving narrative of financial crime. The case highlights the importance of vigilance and regulatory scrutiny in an innovative industry that has more than its fair share of bad actors.

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) has moved recently to address concerns related to peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions while in a separate development, the country’s GameFi community is calling for regulatory change to enable greater liquidity. The two distinct developments both relate to getting the balance right in terms of crypto regulation from the perspectives of regulators and lawmakers and crypto sector entrepreneurs and participants.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashAddressing concernsIt emerged last week that the FSA had proposed a number of measures to safeguard users against “unlawful transactions,” causing alarm that any such moves would inhibit the P2P transactions market. Responding to a query from Cointelegraph, the FSA elaborated that its recommendation does not encompass "transactions from one individual to another." Instead, it aims to bolster measures against illicit money transfers, particularly instances where an individual deposits cash from their bank account into an account belonging to a crypto asset exchange service provider. The regulator clarified that under the new recommendations, banks would intercept suspicious transactions where the sender seeks to alter their name for the purpose of depositing funds into the crypto platform. The FSA outlined that this situation arises where a fraudster convinces an innocent exchange user to effect the name change, so that exchange rules can be circumvented and the fraudster can receive funds from the scam victim. According to the FSA, numerous financial institutions have already implemented these measures, although the agency has not received any reports of specific cases raising concerns regarding crypto asset markets. Notably, the FSA emphasizes that its recommendations are not universally mandated for all financial institutions, with banks expected to devise and implement measures tailored to their specific circumstances. Solving crypto market liquidity issuesWith that clarification, it appears that the measures won’t have the negative impact on P2P crypto markets as many market participants originally feared. Meanwhile, in a distinct development, Japan's blockchain gaming community has approached the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to seek assistance in bolstering liquidity within Japan's crypto asset market. Taking to the X social media platform on Wednesday, Ryo Matsubara, director of Oasys, a GameFi blockchain, outlined that he had visited the LDP's digital society promotion headquarters on behalf of Japanese blockchain gaming projects to raise concerns about stringent regulations impeding liquidity in Japan, which directly impedes the growth of the GameFi ecosystem. Matsubara advocates for regulations that incentivize safe cryptocurrency investment, positing that increased liquidity, marked by a surge in buyers and sellers, could result from such measures. Oasys intends to continue collaborating with the government to enhance Japan's global competitiveness in the Web3 market, with Matsubara expressing confidence in Japan's potential to reclaim its illustrious gaming legacy on Web3. While Japan initially harbored skepticism toward crypto adoption, its stance has softened in recent times. Matsubara acknowledged the positive impact of a recent crypto-related tax reform which was enacted in December. In September 2023, the Japanese government commenced planning to permit startups to raise public funds through crypto asset issuance. That bill was approved last week and now goes forward to the Japanese parliament for further deliberation. These recent developments demonstrate that Japan is navigating regulatory complexities as it seeks to balance innovation with consumer protection in the burgeoning crypto space.

Seoul and Baobab Partners Face Controversy Over Unpaid Prize Winnings for SWF2023 HackathonThe city of Seoul has come under public scrutiny for failing to pay the winners of the Seoul Web3 Festival (SWF2023) Hackathon a cash prize worth KRW 150 million (approximately $112,000). The Seoul Metropolitan Government has argued that since it was simply a naming rights sponsor, the responsibility for paying the prizes lies with Baobab Partners, who co-hosted the event. However, critics argue that the city did not properly vet Baobab Partners more rigorously before hosting the event.Photo by okaybuild on PixabayUnpaid prizes lingerThe SWF2023 Hackathon took place from July 31 to August 2 at Dongdaemun Design Plaza (DDP) and was co-hosted by the city of Seoul, the Seoul Design Foundation, and Baobab Partners. It offered a total prize pool of KRW 150 million attracting 417 participants who made up 115 teams.However, although over two months have passed since then, the winners are yet to be paid their prize money. “Baobab Partners initially proposed the SWF2023 event, and they were responsible for gathering the necessary sponsorship funds to run the event,” said a city representative.According to industry sources on Monday, the company’s CEO, Choi Jin-beom, issued a handwritten apology last Friday regarding the incident. “We promised to pay the winners by today, but we were unable to deliver on that promise. We explored multiple avenues, including investors, new contractors, and other assets, but were ultimately unable to secure the funds to do so,” he said. “The narrative that the funds were diverted elsewhere or invested in cryptocurrencies or stocks is untrue,” he added, clarifying that related information was transparently disclosed to the city of Seoul.Baobab Partners’ swift rise raises industry eyebrowsBaobab Partners had previously participated as an event planner at last year’s Blockchain Week in Busan, which turned out to be a success. “We also spoke with the Busan city government, who gave a positive opinion of the company,” the representative added. It was under this context that Seoul entered into a naming rights agreement with Baobab Partners. The agreement stipulated that the company would be in charge of attracting and managing sponsorships, and the prize money and operational costs would be covered by corporate sponsorship funds.Nevertheless, questions have arisen within the industry about Baobab Partners’ short track record and its successive collaborations with public organizations. Baobab Partners is a startup that was founded in May 2021. In November of the same year, the firm signed memoranda of understanding with three blockchain companies during NFT Busan 2021, a large-scale NFT fair held in the southern port city to share the latest blockchain trends. As a result of its efforts, it was listed alongside prominent companies such as Coinone and Onther despite only six months passing since its establishment. Subsequently, Baobab Partners relocated from Seoul to Busan, and the following year, it participated as an event planner at Blockchain Week in Busan.Accumulating allegationsSpeculation suggests that this success was not solely due to Baobab Partners’s capabilities. The company’s CEO is believed to have political connections, according to an anonymous industry insider. Choi denied such claims and stressed that its technical expertise should not be downplayed, citing the fact that Baobab Partners was the first entity in Korea to develop virtual reality (VR) banking technology and had received a KRW 15 billion investment from Finger, a KOSDAQ-listed company.Baobab Partners has also been mired in controversy over supposedly unpaid wages. In response to a claim made by an industry source that many former employees of Baobab Partners have still not received their due wages, a Seoul representative stated that there is no such dispute according to conversations with company representatives, seeking to dispel the dispute. Choi further explained, “We didn’t have wage disputes until last year. The difficulty in paying wages began in January this year due to the failure to execute promised investment funds.”The city said that it is currently conducting legal examinations and looking into necessary measures for two matters involving Baobab Partners, including the handling of hackathon winnings.