AhnLab Blockchain Company to integrate digital wallet into Sogang University’s education metaverse

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Kuwait Implements Full Ban on Crypto ActivitiesIn a significant move to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, Kuwait has taken a decisive step by announcing a complete ban on all crypto-related activities.Photo by Jan Dommerholt on Unsplash“No legal status”According to a circular issued by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), Kuwait’s top financial regulator, earlier this week, cryptocurrencies are deemed to have “no legal status” and lack the support of any government or any asset. As a result, the prices of these digital assets are vulnerable to speculative swings, exposing investors to potential substantial losses. Consequently, the CMA asserts that engaging in crypto activities can lead to adverse consequences and financial risks for individuals and businesses alike.The ban extends beyond trading and mining. It also prohibits public companies from offering any cryptocurrency-related services. The CMA emphasized that it has never granted approval for crypto services in the past, and this outright ban reinforces the country’s commitment to curbing illicit financial activities facilitated by cryptocurrencies.Aligning with FATFThe decision comes in the wake of Kuwait’s determination to align with the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) global requirements for handling crypto assets. The country is attempting to demonstrate its compliance with international anti-money laundering guidelines by clamping down on digital assets.Kuwait’s approach towards cryptocurrencies diverges significantly from other Gulf states that have embraced the nascent industry with more openness. The likes of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain have previously engaged with crypto assets in various ways.For example, Bahrain granted approval to global crypto exchange platform Binance to provide digital asset services within the country. It’s keen to embrace digital assets as it pivots away from an oil-based economy. The Kingdom recently welcomed plans by Singapore-based private equity firm Whampoa Group to establish a crypto-friendly digital bank there.Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund has also invested in several US-based venture capital funds which are focused on crypto and blockchain technologies.Dubai, in particular, has been actively working on establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets, aiming to position itself as a digital hub in the region. The UAE as a whole has recognized crypto assets as securities for several years, fostering a favorable environment for crypto businesses.CriticismNews of the ban also provoked criticism, including commentary from Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer with the Human Rights Foundation. Gladstein, taking to Twitter, stated: “ Not surprising. I expect all authoritarian regimes (especially gulf tyrannies like the UAE and Saudi Arabia) to follow in Kuwait’s footsteps and eventually pass severe restrictions on citizen use of Bitcoin.” While the UAE trends in the opposite direction, Gladstein is not optimistic about the free use of decentralized cryptocurrencies in the UAE over the longer term.As the global crypto landscape continues to evolve, each country in the Gulf region is adopting unique approaches to address the opportunities and challenges posed by digital assets. While there may be opposition to the technology, decentralized digital assets will benefit from jurisdictional arbitrage in efforts to get this innovation rolled out for the benefit of ordinary people around the world.

Israel Doubles Down on Blocking Crypto Funding of HamasIn a move to disrupt the flow of funds to Hamas, Israeli authorities have ordered the closure of over 100 cryptocurrency accounts on Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange.Photo by Leonid Altman on PexelsHeightened monitoring of crypto-related financingIsraeli authorities were already monitoring crypto accounts suspected of terrorism financing before the recent attack by the Palestinian militant group Hamas. Since then, they have requested information about hundreds of accounts on Binance, suggesting that the scale of their actions has grown significantly since October 7.A statement from Israeli police last week outlined that they had frozen crypto accounts related to financing of Hamas. According to a report on Tuesday by the Financial Times (FT), the Israeli authorities have taken matters further still, having closed more than one hundred accounts on Binance.Scrutinizing 200 additional accountsSources cited by the FT as being close to the situation have revealed that these actions were initiated in response to Hamas’s assault on October 7. Authorities have also sought information on approximately 200 additional crypto accounts, with most of them being held on Binance. While Binance has acknowledged blocking a “small number” of accounts since the summer, it emphasized its adherence to internationally recognized sanctions rules and declined to provide further comment.Governments and regulators have long expressed concerns that terrorist organizations might exploit lightly regulated crypto markets for financial transactions. However, the recent attacks on Israel and the subsequent crypto-based fundraising campaigns by Hamas have made these concerns more pressing.Tom Alexandrovich, the Executive Director at the Israel National Cyber Directorate, stated that cryptocurrency has become a major tool for terror financing during these times of conflict. He noted that the amount of crypto funds involved has significantly increased since the start of the attack.Tether freezes accountsTether, the issuer of leading US dollar stablecoin USDT, announced on Monday that it had frozen 32 addresses containing more than $873,000 due to their alleged links to “terrorism and warfare” in Israel and Ukraine. The exact timing of when these accounts were blocked and the distribution of assets between Israel and Ukraine were not disclosed.Notably, US financial regulators previously alleged that money held on Binance had ties to Hamas. A lawsuit by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the United States in March claimed that senior Binance executives had knowledge of “Hamas transactions” in 2019. Binance has refuted these allegations and expressed its intent to contest the lawsuit.Commentators within the crypto space fear that opponents of the development of crypto, like US Senator Elizabeth Warren, will try to capitalize on this issue by using the opportunity to further draconian regulation.Over the past two years, Israeli authorities have seized millions of shekels from crypto accounts with suspected ties to Hamas and other militant groups in the Middle East. A recent analysis by Elliptic found that crypto wallets associated with various suspicious Middle East groups have interacted and relied on the same crypto exchange services to convert crypto into sovereign currencies.