Fingerlabs launches Web3 solution to help partners build membership NFTs

CoinFLEX Effects Partial Repayment of SmartBCH DebtCoinFLEX, a Seychelles-based crypto yield platform that operated the BCH to sBCH cross-chain bridge, has taken a significant step towards its restructuring plans by partially repaying its debts to SmartBCH Alliance.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on PexelsBitcoin Cash sidechainAs part of the repayment, SmartBCH, a Bitcoin Cash sidechain compatible with Ethereum, received distributions from CoinFLEX, including approximately 4.28 million rvUSD ($750,000), 652,000 USDC ($652,000), and 6,834 BCH ($1.6 million). Notably, 80% of the received USDC has been swapped into Bitcoin Cash, while the remaining portion has been reserved to cover legal and operational expenses. SmartBCH currently holds a total of 10,758 BCH.The repayment to SmartBCH comes amidst a significant surge in the price of Bitcoin Cash, which has witnessed a remarkable increase of over 110% in the past seven days. This surge has positioned Bitcoin Cash as a top performer among major currencies in the crypto market, according to data from CoinGecko.Bitcoin Cash, along with other Bitcoin forks, has been benefiting from the overall rise in the cryptocurrency market. The increased interest can be attributed to the flurry of spot Bitcoin ETF filings that have taken place recently.The positive developments surrounding CoinFLEX and Bitcoin Cash have also had a ripple effect on associated tokens. $FLEX and $OX, tokens connected to CoinFLEX, have experienced notable increases in value, rising by 53% and 65% respectively over the past week.CoinFLEX itself has been undergoing a significant restructuring process that was approved by the Seychelles Courts on March 6. The exchange initially suspended withdrawals in June 2022, citing extreme market conditions and uncertainty related to a counterparty.CoinFLEX was one of several crypto firms affected by the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022, resulting in the loss of over $40 billion in investor value within a short period. In September, the company revealed its restructuring proposal, which involved offering over 65% of its equity to creditors and allocating 15% to employees.OPNX rebrandLast March, CoinFLEX rebranded itself as Open Exchange (OPNX) following the approval of its restructuring plan. The founders of CoinFLEX, Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam, are collaborating with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the co-founders of the bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), on the new Dubai-based venture.SmartBCH has announced its intention to open an account on OPNX and gradually convert rvUSD into Bitcoin Cash through the exchange. It is worth noting that, as part of the restructuring terms, SmartBCH is entitled to common equity in CoinFLEX and one board seat, although it has not received these benefits at present.Additionally, SmartBCH has burned 33,365.67 sBCH tokens, returning them to the old bridge address. As a result, the total sBCH in circulation on the sidechain now amounts to 67,756.766.To further enhance stability, SmartBCH has entered into an agreement with CoinFLEX to assume responsibility for maintaining the 1:1 peg between sBCH (the sidechain’s native token) and BCH.

HashKey Gears Up to Offer Trading Service to Retail TradersHashKey is gearing up to launch its services to retail traders in Hong Kong with the intention of offering them Bitcoin and Ether trading products initially.The Hong Kong-based digital asset management platform received full licensing approval from the local regulator, the Securities Futures Commission (SFC), earlier this month. It’s anticipated that the platform will launch to retail on August 28.That’s according to a report from a local media source earlier this week. Financial publication Investing.com stated: “General investors in the period can only trade Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), because these two currencies currently account for most of the trading volume in the market.“It’s worth noting, however, that investors will be subject to a cap, permitted to allocate only up to 30% of their net worth into the realm of cryptocurrencies while utilizing the platform.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashServing retail clientsIt’s a significant milestone for both HashKey and the regulator, given that Hong Kong has been making huge efforts to further the development of digital asset innovation within the Chinese autonomous territory over the course of the past twelve months. Hashkey, alongside brokerage and exchange business OSL (also successful in obtaining a license), has been collaborating with regulators from an early stage in the lead-up to both receiving full licensing.HashKey got to this point by focusing on two pivotal licenses offered by the SFC. The first of these licenses, known as Type 1, paved the way for HashKey to initiate a virtual asset trading platform, aligning seamlessly with the regulatory framework laid out under Hong Kong’s securities laws. The second license, Type 7, empowers the crypto platform to furnish automated trading services to both institutional and retail clientele.Nurturing digital asset innovationHong Kong has maintained a resolute focus on cultivating a crypto-friendly environment within its borders in 2023. Echoing this sentiment, Financial Secretary Paul Chan asserted the government’s and regulatory bodies’ determination to incubate a robust crypto and fintech ecosystem throughout the year.By March, over 80 crypto enterprises signaled their intent to establish a presence in Hong Kong, with several major players in the crypto industry among them. In April, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a call to banks, urging them to extend their services to cryptocurrency companies.Banking remains a difficulty in Hong Kong for crypto businesses despite the HKMA’s efforts. However, in the case of both HashKey and OSL, both are being banked by Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank.In May, the HKMA unveiled a comprehensive licensing framework tailored for crypto platforms, imposing a deadline of June 1 for compliance. As August rolled in, a select few crypto platforms clinched the green light to offer crypto trading services to an eclectic client base encompassing both retail and institutional participants.This regulatory framework, designed to safeguard the interests of investors, is playing a large part in Hong Kong’s recent success in developing the sector. In this particular instance, it will mean that retail traders will be granted access to Bitcoin and Ethereum exclusively. This curtailed selection provides a good starting point for retail trading, and it’s likely that we will see HashKey’s trading offering being extended to cover additional digital assets as soon as local regulators permit it.

Korea considers legal recognition of virtual assets as trust assets for investor protectionSouth Korea’s Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is assessing whether customers’ virtual assets on cryptocurrency exchanges should be legally recognized as trust assets. This classification would give users priority in claiming their virtual assets in case of an exchange’s bankruptcy, thus strengthening investor protection. There’s a noted concern about potential disputes in such bankruptcy situations, as users’ digital assets are typically considered to be in the custody or storage of these platforms.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashLegal study by Seoul National UniversityAccording to a Tuesday report by local news outlet ChosunBiz, citing industry and legal sources, the MOJ has initiated a legal study on this subject. The research is being conducted by the Seoul National University R&DB Foundation, which started the project earlier this month.Through this study, the MOJ is expected to examine the legal classification of cryptocurrency as property. This review is significant because, for cryptocurrencies to be held in a trust, they must be legally recognized as property. Meanwhile, the upcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act, set to come into effect next July, mandates that only cash deposits made by users be segregated from the assets of the exchange itself.In Korea, under the current provisions of the Capital Markets Act, virtual assets are not recognized as being held in a trust. Instead, staked cryptocurrencies are seen as being under custodial management or storage. In such arrangements, only a debtor-creditor relationship concerning virtual assets is acknowledged, differing from the legal framework of a trust.Prioritization of rightsIf a cryptocurrency exchange becomes insolvent and enters liquidation, the current legal framework could end up prioritizing the rights of the exchange’s creditors or shareholders over those of the crypto investors. This situation has faced criticism for its inadequate protection of investors. However, if the crypto assets were considered to be held in trusts, it would enable users to acquire “rights to foreclose outside bankruptcy.” This means users would have the right to receive priority reimbursement for their crypto assets, offering them a higher level of protection in the event of an exchange’s bankruptcy.Regarding this development, an official from the MOJ said that while the study is a fundamental legal review focused on exploring ways to protect users through the application of trusts for various cryptocurrency transactions, including those involving decentralized finance (DeFi), it is too early to provide specific details at this stage.