Zipmex proposes creditor repayments of 3 cents on the dollar

Hong Kong's financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has issued a stern warning against two crypto investment schemes, namely the "Floki” and “TokenFi” staking programs. Offering high annual returnsThese programs, luring investors with enticing promises of annual returns ranging from 30% to over 100%, have triggered concerns within the regulatory authority due to their lack of authorization and questionable nature. In an update issued on Friday, the SFC emphasized that both Floki and TokenFi's staking offerings have not been granted approval for public offerings. Furthermore, the administrators of these programs have failed to provide convincing explanations about the feasibility of achieving such unusually high returns. The SFC cautioned that engaging in staking arrangements involving virtual assets without proper authorization may constitute unauthorized collective investment schemes.Photo by Sigmund on UnsplashUnsustainable yieldThe watchdog expressed its worry about the legitimacy of these staking programs, highlighting that neither has received the necessary authorization to provide services to the public in Hong Kong. Investors participating in these programs would not be protected under the SFC's regulations, potentially exposing them to significant financial losses. With the failure of many crypto platforms in 2022, a number of industry commentators began to question the sustainability of some public offerings. One such commentator, Allen Farrington, General Partner at bitcoin-native venture capital firm Axiom, repeatedly asked, “Where does the yield come from?” That appears to be the SFC’s concern in this instance. In its statement, it reaffirmed its commitment to upholding regulatory standards and safeguarding investors from fraudulent schemes. It warned that any breach of the law, including the promotion of unlicensed collective investment schemes, will result in appropriate legal action. Elon Musk-inspired meme coinFloki, initially conceived as a meme-coin inspired by Dogecoin, a project associated with Elon Musk, has evolved into a comprehensive Web3 project spanning decentralized finance, NFTs and the metaverse. TokenFi is a crypto and asset tokenization platform under the Floki umbrella, which aims to capitalize on the booming trillion-dollar tokenization industry. TokenFi, denoted by the ticker TOKEN, seeks to simplify the crypto and asset tokenization process with aspirations of becoming a leading platform globally. Launched last October, TokenFi operates as a multichain tokenization platform on both Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain. While both Floki and TokenFi offer distinct staking programs, they share a close integration. Stakers under the Floki scheme gain access to a significant portion of TokenFi's supply, while TokenFi stakers earn TOKEN rewards through a user-friendly interface. In the broader context of crypto staking, the practice allows users to earn rewards by contributing to a blockchain's security through the proof-of-stake mechanism. By staking cryptocurrency, users participate in a staking pool, similar to depositing money into a savings account. Staking rewards typically range from 5-20%, attracting investors seeking profitable opportunities. However, caution is advised against schemes promising unrealistic returns. The SFC, in collaboration with the Hong Kong Police Force, established a dedicated working group last year to enhance vigilance and enforcement in the evolving crypto sector. 

Taiwan Advances Crypto Regulation with Initial Reading of Digital Asset BillTaiwan has furthered its efforts on the path of digital asset regulation, as the nation’s legislature introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.The “Virtual Asset Management Ordinance Draft” bill represents a significant stride toward establishing a legal framework for digital assets in the country. The proposal passed its first reading at the Taiwanese state legislature, according to published parliamentary records.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashBill objectivesThe primary objectives of the bill are to define virtual assets, establish operational standards for asset operators, enhance customer protection, and make it mandatory for industry players to join relevant associations and secure regulatory permissions.Up until now, Taiwan has maintained a relatively hands-off approach to the cryptocurrency sector. Its oversight was limited to existing know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) laws. However, this stance evolved following the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX in November. The platform’s popularity among Taiwanese users, owing to favorable US dollar interest rates compared to local banks, led to increased regulatory scrutiny.A member of Taiwan’s parliament, Yung-Chang Chiang, told The Block that “after the first reading of the bill, discussions on the regulatory framework for the virtual asset industry have progressed to the next stage.” Chiang added:“We hope that the Financial Supervisory Commission can also submit their version of a draft bill to the legislature, allowing various sectors of society to further consolidate consensus during the process.”In contrast to cryptocurrency regulations in neighboring Hong Kong, Taiwan’s bill does not adopt a strong stance on derivatives or stablecoins. Nevertheless, it recognizes that derivatives linked to virtual assets possess unique characteristics, with a specific mention of perpetual contracts. This recognition opens the door for the possibility of cryptocurrency derivative-specific regulation in future drafts.Importantly, the bill does not restrict the trading of virtual assets to professional investors, which allows broader participation in the digital asset market.Auditing and segregation of fundsUnlike Japan, which mandates the use of custodians for locally licensed exchanges, the draft bill in Taiwan only necessitates the segregation of customer assets from business funds. It does not explicitly require the involvement of third-party custodians.Under this legislation, exchange operators will be obliged to commission periodic reports from accountants regarding their operations and asset management. Additionally, regulators, such as the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), will have the authority to conduct regular inspections of exchange internal control and audit systems.Although this initial draft does not explicitly mention “Proof of Reserves,” it does indicate that the regulator will establish standards for asset ratios after consulting with industry stakeholders, with the expectation that licensed exchanges will adhere to these standards.Fostering self regulationTaiwan’s crypto industry stakeholders have expressed their support for formal regulatory oversight. Wayne Huang, co-founder and CEO of Taipei-based fintech company XREX, recently affirmed the industry’s willingness to collaborate with the FSC in defining regulatory operations.In tandem with the establishment of a regulatory framework, regulators have indicated that they want industry stakeholders to move towards some level of self-regulation. That led nine exchange businesses to form an industry association last month.The bill’s second reading is pending, and the FSC is anticipated to provide its input and recommendations before the next phase of the legislative process.

The crypto space continues to suffer a disproportionate share of hacks and scams that were further exacerbated on Wednesday, with Malaysian crypto data aggregator the latest to succumb to a security breach. Serving as yet another stark reminder of the persistent threats plaguing the sector, a phishing scam targeted CoinGecko's X account, leading to a brief compromise that raised concerns about the safety of user information.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashPhishing scamDuring this incident, hackers posted a phishing link on CoinGecko's X account, falsely advertising a token airdrop for a cryptocurrency named GCKO. The deceptive post claimed that GCKO could be used for API services, including the cryptocurrency ANKR. Swift action by CoinGecko involved the removal of the fraudulent post and a public warning urging users to avoid interacting with any suspicious links or content. In an X post, CoinGecko wrote:”Our Twitter accounts @CoinGecko and @GeckoTerminal have been compromised. We're taking immediate steps to investigate the situation and secure our accounts. Please DO NOT click on any links or engage with suspicious content. Your security is our top priority.” Employee errorThe firm followed up with an update on Thursday, attributing the breach to a team member inadvertently clicking on a fraudulent Calendly link, granting unauthorized access to the hacker. Despite having two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled and employing robust security measures, CoinGecko emphasized that the inadvertent click allowed unauthorized access. The compromised accounts were then exploited to disseminate misleading information and potentially engage in malicious activities. CoinGecko expressed sincere apologies for any confusion or inconvenience caused by the incident. The company reiterated its commitment to platform security and continuous improvement of internal controls, assuring users that corrective measures were promptly implemented. SEC incompetenceCoinGecko's security incident occurred within 24 hours of a similar occurrence involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC's X account was compromised, with scammers posting a false message from Chair Gary Gensler about the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). While CoinGecko identified a vulnerability in its security regimen, the SEC later confirmed that the breach in its case was far more basic. It was not due to infrastructure attacks but rather the lack of 2-factor authentication (2FA) tied to the SEC's account, the most basic form of operations security. Gensler and the SEC have come in for major criticism from the crypto community in the U.S. due to a policy of regulation by enforcement that has been pursued. With that, the Commission came in for swift and harsh criticism in the immediate aftermath of its X account hack. Many pointed out the irony of Gensler advising consumers to secure their accounts back in October when the SEC itself had failed to do so. Others queried who would be responsible for what some interpreted as an episode of market manipulation, something that the SEC has perennially associated the crypto markets with. During the time that the account was compromised, millions of dollars of value were liquidated in short and long trading positions. CoinGecko's quick response serves as a valuable lesson in the importance of vigilance and proactive security measures amid the growing threats facing the cryptocurrency community.