BU Technology to provide digital asset issuance platform to Ret Games

Animoca Brands Expands Focus to Non-US MarketsHong Kong-based Web3 and blockchain unicorn, Animoca Brands, is shifting its attention to markets outside the United States following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) classification of its $SAND token as an unregistered security.This move comes after the SEC named $SAND, along with other tokens like Solana and Polygon, in lawsuits against major exchanges Binance and Coinbase Global. The labeling of these tokens as securities by the SEC poses legal risks for companies involved in their sale.Photo by Zulian Firmansyah on UnsplashNavigating regulatory challengesAnimoca Brands, led by Co-Founder and Chairman Yat Siu, has long embraced a global approach rather than focusing solely on one territory. Siu clarified the firm’s response to the latest regulatory development to the South China Morning Post (SCMP) via email on Thursday.He emphasized that while the SEC concentrates on the US, Animoca Brands operates in more progressive jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Japan, where $SAND is widely available and accepted. In response to the recent blockchain-hostile climate in the US, the company has proactively started emphasizing other markets, reducing its reliance on the US market and mitigating potential risks associated with regulatory actions.Exchange business impactWhile Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has declared that his company has no intentions of delisting tokens labeled as securities by the SEC, this decision poses challenges for other exchanges less committed to selling these tokens. Dan Gallagher, Chief Legal Compliance and Corporate Affairs Officer of Robinhood Markets, expressed concerns about listing tokens due to regulatory rules and the uncertainty surrounding tokens created by organizations outside the US.These developments could have a chilling effect on exchanges, prompting crypto firms to consider moving away from the US market due to perceived uncertainty and the associated legal risks. As a demonstration of that, in a bankruptcy court hearing on Thursday, it emerged that the FTX Debtor is talking with bidders with a view to restarting the international business but restarting the US-based business is less certain.Animoca’s Middle East ventureIn a further display of its commitment to expanding outside the US, Animoca Brands announced plans in March to make significant investments, worth tens of millions of dollars, in the Middle East. This move reflects the company’s proactive strategy to tap into non-US markets and leverage the growth potential offered by progressive jurisdictions.Animoca Brands’ decision to prioritize non-US markets and reduce its reliance on the US market aligns with its global operating approach. The SEC’s classification of $SAND as a security has prompted the company to shift its attention to more progressive jurisdictions where $SAND remains widely accessible.As other firms, including Ripple, also explore growth opportunities outside the US, the global landscape of the crypto industry is evolving. By navigating regulatory challenges and expanding into promising markets, Animoca Brands aims to position itself for continued success and mitigate potential risks associated with the SEC’s actions in the US market.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's Worldcoin project aims to bolster ties with Malaysian officials amid concerns over data privacy. Sam Altman and Alex Blania, key figures behind the Worldcoin project, recently engaged in discussions with Malaysian leaders, including the nation's Prime Minister, to enhance government relations. The move comes as Worldcoin faces scrutiny and seeks to address concerns surrounding data protection.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashAddressing privacy concernsThe "proof-of-personhood" crypto project has been under scrutiny for its data collection practices. Last month, temporary bans were imposed by Spain and Portugal, halting Worldcoin's data collection activities. The project offers WLD tokens to users in exchange for iris scans to create their personal World ID, prompting privacy advocates' concerns. Government attention and oversightWorldcoin's high-profile nature, coupled with Sam Altman's involvement, has drawn significant government attention. Countries like Germany, France, Argentina, Kenya and South Korea have initiated investigations into the project's data collection practices. Despite challenges, senior government officials continue to engage with Worldcoin amidst growing concerns about artificial intelligence threats like deepfakes. Strengthening government relationsTo address regulatory concerns, Worldcoin's parent company, Tools for Humanity, appointed Trevor Traina, former U.S. ambassador to Austria, as Head of Global Affairs. Traina emphasized the importance of meeting policymakers' expectations regarding data privacy and security. New privacy measuresIn response to regulatory pressures, Worldcoin introduced "Personal Custody," discontinuing the storage of biometric data for new signups. Additionally, users can now request the deletion of their iris codes, and stricter age verification measures have been implemented to prevent minors from signing up. These measures were developed in consultation with privacy experts and data protection authorities. Despite challenges, Worldcoin has assigned over five million World IDs, according to project data. 

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal PropertyAccording to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashProperty classificationLocal news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.Contentious approach to cryptoWhile China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.Differing interpretationsThe divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.Global issueIt’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.