BIONES partners with Bithumb Burrito Wallet for integrated service development

The Philippines is on track to finalize Project Agila, its wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) trial, by the end of this year. Three primary use casesThat’s according to statements made on March 6 by Deputy Governor Mamerto Tangonan of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) —  the Philippine central bank. According to a local news report by GMA News, the Deputy Governor outlined three primary use cases for the wholesale CBDC trials in a press conference: interbank settlement, settlement of securities transactions and cross-border payments. Notably, the Philippines is participating as an observer in the cross-border CBDC project mBridge, which involves China, Hong Kong, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Six domestic institutions are involved in the current tests in the Philippines: BDO Unibank, China Banking Corp, Land Bank of the Philippines, Rizal Commercial Banking, Union Bank of the Philippines and Maya Philippines.Photo by OJ Serrano on UnsplashUsing pilot as ‘learning exercise’Tangonan described the pilot as a "learning exercise in order to put us in a better position to assess whether this technology is what, itself, claims to be.” Typically, central bank accounts are restricted to commercial banks and some central counterparties in financial markets. However, the BSP intends for the wholesale CBDC to be accessible to banks and certain financial institutions. Nevertheless, past tests, including one in Canada, have highlighted potential limitations, such as the inability of brokers to use the wholesale CBDC for settlement. An ongoing interest since 2020The Philippines initially expressed interest in issuing a CBDC in 2020, with the BSP Monetary Board conducting a positive initial assessment of a wholesale CBDC and planning pilot tests from 2022 onwards, known then as Project CBDCPh. The launch of the pilot project was announced in April 2022. In 2023, the Southeast Asian country participated in a pilot study with the Digital Dollar Project, Western Union and BDO Unibank to explore a retail CBDC for remittance purposes. While the study found potential cost reductions and increased transparency and competition, it also identified challenges related to transaction speed, particularly due to most remittances arriving after working hours. Moving away from blockchainLast September, the BSP announced plans to utilize the Hyperledger Fabric blockchain. However, in February, Governor Eli Remolona stated that the CBDC would not be utilizing blockchain technology. At that time, the central bank Governor had indicated the expectation of launching a wholesale CBDC either next year or by 2026. Elsewhere in the Asian region, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) recently announced its own wholesale CBDC trials, Project Ensemble, underscoring the growing interest and activity in CBDC development across various jurisdictions. The Chinese autonomous territory is also cooperating with its colleagues in mainland China in participating in testing of the digital yuan or e-CNY, with a particular focus on cross-border payments.India represents another key Asian nation which has devoted quite a lot of time and resources to CBDC development already. However, a report last month suggested that the world’s most populous country has concerns with regard to the question of privacy relative to CBDC use. For that reason, it has determined the need to remain cautious while continuing CBDC development.  

Mirae Asset Securities, South Korea’s largest asset management firm, has begun suspending trading for bitcoin ETFs, according to industry sources on Friday. This comes after an announcement made by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) stating that brokering spot bitcoin ETFs may be considered a violation of the government’s stance on virtual assets and the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashTaking preemptive measuresThe asset manager has blocked new purchases of spot bitcoin ETFs listed in Canada and Germany starting yesterday and is considering suspending trading of bitcoin futures ETFs that have been listed in overseas markets since 2021. This includes the Proshares Bitcoin Strategy ETF, Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF, Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin Strategy ETF and VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF. As Korean financial authorities are putting the brakes on domestic investments in the recently approved spot bitcoin ETF by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), it is believed that Mirae Asset Securities is putting a preemptive halt to trading in other bitcoin ETFs. Spot vs futuresSpot bitcoin ETFs differ from futures ETFs in that they track the price of Bitcoin by actually holding the cryptocurrency, while the latter tracks its price through futures contracts. South Korean securities firms have been brokering futures ETFs listed in overseas market for a while now.

In a move to enhance the oversight of cross-border wire transfers involving virtual assets, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the central bank of the Philippines, is fortifying the implementation of regulations relative to crypto transfers.Photo by C Bueza on UnsplashTravel rule clarificationsLocal news outlet, the English language newspaper The Philippine Star reported that central bank memorandum 2023-042 provides clarifications on the travel rule for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The travel rule requires financial institutions to pass on information to the next institution where a transaction takes place. The BSP aims to bring greater clarity to several aspects, including the applicability of the P50,000 transaction threshold and expectations regarding transactions involving jurisdictions without travel rules. Additionally, further interpretation is being provided concerning the extension of the Philippine travel rule to non-custodial VASPs and regulatory expectations surrounding transactions with unhosted wallets or crypto wallets controlled directly by their owners, rather than managed by third-party service providers. FATF compliance ambitionThis regulatory move is in response to the directives from the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2021 the Philippines came under greater scrutiny from the intergovernmental organization, when it was included on its "gray list," making it a candidate for increased monitoring. The FATF has called upon the Philippines to establish guidelines for the travel rule to prevent terrorists and criminals from exploiting virtual asset transfers for the unrestricted movement of their assets and to detect and prevent misuse effectively.BSP-supervised financial institutions (BSFIs) are now mandated to scrutinize specific details of virtual asset transfers, including the originator's name, account number used in the transaction, originator's physical address or national identity and the beneficiary's name and account number. International moves towards complianceThis latest move by the Philippine central bank is not unusual. In recent months, a plethora of similarly motivated central banks around the world have tightened up on crypto regulation as it relates to the FATF directives. Being on the FATF's "gray list" is bad for a country’s reputation. It has the potential to result in loss of investor confidence and lead to higher compliance costs and greater monitoring. Additionally, it may have an impact on trade relations and damage a country’s ability to access international finance.  Turkey has also found itself on the organization’s gray list. Working towards repairing that situation, Turkey is in the process of establishing a crypto regulatory framework that will be FATF compliant.In May, Pakistan went a step further in banning cryptocurrency. At the time, its Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha, stated that the ban had been a requirement for Pakistan’s removal from the FATF gray list. A tightening of crypto regulations has also occurred in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in Hong Kong more recently, as those territories work towards ensuring FATF compliance. The BSP emphasizes that transactions not surpassing the P50,000 threshold or its equivalent in foreign currency must include the names and account numbers of both the originator and beneficiary. Both originating and beneficiary VASPs are required to establish and adhere to robust sanction screening procedures, ensuring compliance with sanctions lists and preventing transactions involving sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions.