NEOPIN teams up with Ticker Capital to expand Web3 ecosystem

Bali Governor Warns Tourists of Consequences of Crypto UseAuthorities in Bali have issued a stern warning to foreign tourists, cautioning against the use of cryptocurrencies as a means of payment.Bali Governor Wayan Koster delivered the message during a tourism development press conference on Sunday, stating that individuals who pay with crypto or violate other regulations could face severe consequences, including deportation, criminal penalties, or strict sanctions.Photo by Alfiano Sutianto on UnsplashCrypto use “dealt with firmly”According to reports from state-owned Indonesian news agency Antara, Governor Koster emphasized the need for firm action against foreign tourists who engage in inappropriate behavior, violate their visa permit conditions, attempt to use cryptocurrencies for transactions, or infringe upon other provisions. Koster stated that tourists that violate Indonesian law and use cryptocurrency for payment “will be dealt with firmly.”Indonesian law mandates that all transactions within the country must be conducted in the local currency, the rupiah. Individuals found using alternative currencies can face imprisonment of up to one year and fines of up to 200 million rupiah ($13,300). These regulations were initially implemented to safeguard the rupiah from the widespread use of the U.S. dollar in the country.‘Silicon Bali’In recent years, however, Bali has emerged as a popular destination for crypto enthusiasts, earning the moniker of ‘Silicon Bali.’ The island has witnessed the rise of cryptocurrencies, with the local crypto community even establishing physical spaces such as the clubhouse set up by Indonesian exchange Tokocrypto.While the use of cryptocurrencies as assets is permitted in Indonesia, their use as a form of payment is strictly prohibited. The country also imposes restrictions on individuals engaging in foreign exchange business activities, requiring them to obtain permission from Bank Indonesia.During the press conference, Governor Koster reiterated the regulations, emphasizing that violations would result in administrative sanctions, including written reprimands, fines, and prohibitions on payment transactions.This latest announcement is part of ongoing efforts to curb negative tourist behavior on the island. Bali, heavily reliant on tourism, experienced significant setbacks due to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent travel restrictions. With the return of international visitors, new challenges have emerged.Earlier this year, Governor Koster proposed a ban on tourists using motorbikes following numerous traffic violations and accidents. Concerns have also been raised regarding tourists disrespecting local traditions by posing nude in sacred sites or engaging in digital nomad activities without obtaining proper visas.Policy strugglesThe firm stance taken in Bali on cryptocurrency payments aligns with the local administration’s commitment to upholding local regulations and maintaining the stability of the national currency. However, the Governor’s response is further evidence of the struggles that centralized governments and administrations around the world have been having in understanding decentralized cryptocurrency. The default position of many centralized governments has naturally enough been to control it.For that reason, we have seen administrations in places like India who have changed tact several times, sometimes banning crypto while at other times, permitting it. As time goes on, central administrators are beginning to realize that they can’t control it fully. They can only slow down its rate of progress at best.Over the course of the past 26 years, the Southeast Asian country’s sovereign currency has averaged an inflation rate of 9%, peaking in 1998 at a rate of 82%. Against that background, there’s likely to be an ever-growing interest in using decentralized cryptocurrency in the country.

The decision by U.S. regulators to approve spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in January appears to be having some knock-on effects, with the latest such response seeing the Thai authorities enable access to such products for institutional investors and ultra-high-net-worth individuals within Thailand.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsMeeting a growing demandAccording to a report in the Bangkok Post on March 12, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has agreed that Thai asset management firms may manage and offer funds that incorporate investment in U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF products. The decision was arrived at following a recent SEC board meeting. The SEC's decision reflects a strategic response to the growing demand for digital asset exposure among institutional investors. It would appear that spot Bitcoin ETF approval in the United States has bolstered investor confidence in this investment instrument on an international basis. Urging cautionDespite the opportunities this presents for institutional investors, the SEC has emphasized caution, citing the high-risk nature of digital asset investments. SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon verbalized that need for caution, stating: "Asset management firms asked the SEC for them to have exposure in digital assets, especially Bitcoin and spot Bitcoin ETFs, but we need to consider carefully whether to allow asset management firms to invest in digital assets directly due to the high risk.”It’s interesting to note that in an immediate response to the approval of these products in the United States in January, Thailand’s SEC clarified that it had no plans to allow asset management firms to launch similar products within Thailand. For the moment at least, it seems that demand will be satisfied by accessing products that have gained exposure to U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs instead. Retail investors excludedWhile this move expands the investment landscape for institutional players, retail investors in Thailand find themselves sidelined due to regulatory restrictions. The amended regulations primarily cater to accredited investors, leaving retail participation in spot Bitcoin ETFs out of reach. This exclusion contrasts with the popularity of retail crypto trading in Thailand, albeit within regulated boundaries. Recent government regulations have both facilitated and restricted certain crypto activities. Thailand's move aligns with broader trends in the cryptocurrency sector, with several countries, including South Korea and Hong Kong, exploring opportunities in the space. In Hong Kong, regulators are currently processing applications for Bitcoin ETFs, with several financial institutions expressing interest in introducing spot Bitcoin ETFs. Just like the Thai authorities, the governor of the Royal Bank of India (RBI) had also responded in the aftermath of product approval in the U.S. stating that he didn’t favor the approval of such products in India. Despite that, news emerged on March 11 that Indian crypto investment platform Mudrex is planning to meet demand by providing clients with access to these U.S. products. As institutional investors gear up to capitalize on this opportunity in Thailand, the regulatory framework surrounding digital assets will continue to shape market dynamics, both domestically and internationally.

Korbit relists blockchain gaming token WEMIXKorbit, a major fiat-to-cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, is relisting WEMIX, a cryptocurrency issued by blockchain gaming company Wemade. Korbit’s decision follows in the footsteps of its local competitors, Coinone and Gopax, who have also recently reinstated WEMIX. The WEMIX token is used to pay transaction fees, stake and vote on governance proposals.Starting at 1:00 a.m. UTC on Dec. 7, Korbit users gained the ability to create a WEMIX wallet and deposit the token on the exchange. Trading and withdrawals of WEMIX will be enabled at 3:00 p.m. UTC on the same day.The Korbit exchange only accepts WEMIX deposits originating from the Wemix network. Deposits of WEMIX sent from other blockchain networks, including BNB Beacon Chain, Ethereum and Klaytn, may be processed improperly and carry the risk of becoming irretrievable.Photo by Asa E-K on UnsplashDecision reversal and underlying rationalesOver a year ago, the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), a coalition of the five Korean fiat-to-crypto exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — collectively decided to delist WEMIX from all their platforms. This decision was based on several concerns, including unreliable disclosure of the token’s circulating supply, provision of inadequate and misleading information to investors and inconsistencies in the data provided during the explanation period. These issues collectively eroded trust in the company.However, Korbit has determined that the previously identified issues with WEMIX have been addressed. The exchange observed that the circulating supply of WEMIX has been reduced to a level that aligns with the schedule initially submitted to DAXA. The launch of the WEMIX mainnet rectified the discrepancy where the circulating supply displayed on crypto data platforms like CoinMarketCap was twice the actual figure. Additionally, the collateral that Wemade had deposited in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Kokoa Finance has been recovered.The crypto trading platform also believes that Wemade has resolved the problem of providing misleading information to investors by making corrections to its third-quarter earnings report.Regarding data fallacies, Korbit holds the view that the game publisher has taken steps to address the inaccuracies in the data previously provided to the alliance. These efforts to reduce uncertainty and fulfill disclosure responsibilities include several measures: Wemade now live-updates the circulating supply of WEMIX and other pertinent details on its official blog. The gaming company has also entrusted the management of its non-circulating WEMIX supply to Ceffu, the sole institutional custodian for Binance, a global crypto exchange. Furthermore, Wemade now makes announcements about token movements whenever they occur.Restrictions imposed on GopaxMeanwhile, Korbit stated its commitment to complying with voluntary regulations and common listing guidelines established between DAXA members. This statement is particularly noteworthy in light of the recent developments with Gopax. Gopax faced the three-month suspension of its voting rights from DAXA, following the relisting of WEMIX.