Top

Dubai regulator takes action against unlicensed crypto firms

Policy & Regulation·October 11, 2024, 7:50 AM

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulatory body which oversees the digital assets market within the emirate of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has taken corrective action against seven unlicensed crypto entities.

 

Fines issued

According to an enforcement notice, published to the VARA website on October 8, the agency issued fines relative to a number of firms that it found were engaging in unlicensed virtual asset-related trading activity.

 

The fines ranged from between 50,000 to 100,000 UAE dirhams (AED), equivalent to between $13,600 and $27,200 in U.S. dollars. The agency outlined that it was taking this corrective action in order to continue its enforcement efforts so as to safeguard Dubai’s virtual asset ecosystem.

 

In its enforcement notice, the regulator did not disclose the names of the entities that have been sanctioned. The agency said that its investigations are ongoing, in partnership with local law enforcement. 

 

A statement from the Regulatory Affairs and Enforcement division within VARA was provided, stating:

 

“VARA will not tolerate any attempts to operate without appropriate licenses, nor will we allow unauthorized marketing of virtual asset activities. Our marketing regulations further emphasize Dubai’s commitment to ensuring transparency and always protecting stakeholder interests.”

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/429f33399acfaf83c1886effdee8cc17.webp
Photo by Alex Block on Unsplash

Cease and desist orders

In addition to fines, VARA also issued the seven firms with cease and desist orders for breaching marketing regulations. Marketing by crypto firms is an area the regulator has been focusing on recently. Last month, VARA published a press release, outlining that it had updated its crypto regulations to specifically deal with marketing-related matters.

 

Alongside that update, it issued a guidance document, clarifying the responsibilities of virtual asset service providers (VASPs) relative to marketing practices. A schedule of fines was provided in the case of a breach of the regulations, while the update set out a need for a mandatory disclaimer on marketing material to indicate that virtual assets are volatile and may lose their value, fully or partially.

 

The Dubai regulator is not the first to home in on the marketing activities of crypto businesses. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enforced additional rules related to crypto marketing in late 2023. Some crypto businesses found the requirements too arduous and left the UK market as a direct consequence.

 

Public warning

In its enforcement notice, the Dubai regulator also had a message for the trading and investing public, stating:

 

“This public warning is VARA’s market notice to all to avoid engaging with any unlicensed firms.” The regulator added that interacting with unlicensed entities exposes both individual investors and institutions to both financial and reputational risk. 

 

Furthermore, it warned of “potential legal consequences” for regulatory violations. “Only firms licensed by VARA are authorised to provide virtual asset services in/from Dubai, and the Authority remains steadfast in its commitment to protect consumers and investors, and to preserve market integrity,” the regulator further asserted.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 31, 2023

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin Denies Wrongdoing in LUNA Collapse

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin Denies Wrongdoing in LUNA CollapseShin Hyun-seong, popularly known as Daniel Shin, has refuted accusations against him related to the $40 billion collapse of the stablecoin TerraUSD and its companion token, LUNA, according to a report by local news outlet Newspim. He presented this defense during his initial trial at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 30 (local time).Shin co-founded Terraform Labs, the company responsible for issuing TerraUSD and LUNA. His co-founder, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month prison sentence in Montenegro for passport forgery.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashProsecution’s allegationsKorean prosecutors allege that since 2018, Shin and his colleagues have concealed the fabricated nature of the “Terra project.” By manipulating trades and releasing misleading information, they purportedly misled investors into thinking the project was successful. It’s believed they sold off their tokens before the LUNA crash in May 2022, earning KRW 462.9 billion ($343.3 million) from these activities. They are suspected of personally taking KRW 376.9 billion from this amount.Prosecutors are focusing on Shin as the potential orchestrator of the LUNA crash. They speculate he began selling LUNA tokens around when Terraform Labs launched the Anchor Protocol in March 2021. This DeFi protocol increased the popularity and value of LUNA tokens. Before the crash, Shin is alleged to have gained at least KRW 154.1 billion.Defense argumentHowever, Shin’s legal team countered by asserting that Shin had cut ties with Kwon in 2020. They argued the decline of TerraUSD and LUNA was due to Kwon’s mishandling of the Anchor Protocol and an external attack, neither associated with Shin. Regarding the exploit, Terraform Labs has pursued legal action in the United States Southern District of Florida, claiming that American market maker Citadel Securities played a part in undermining TerraUSD in May 2022.Defending Shin, his lawyers emphasized that at the inception of the Terra project, there were no legal guidelines specifically for cryptocurrency transactions. Additionally, unlike Do Kwon who kept fleeing abroad, Shin willingly came back to Korea and has been cooperating with the investigation. They also noted he received only 32% of the 70 million LUNA tokens initially promised. Regarding classification, they stated LUNA isn’t legally recognized as a security.Shin’s lawyers further argued the prosecution hasn’t clearly identified victims or adequately outlined the components of fraud in this case. They said the prosecution’s case hinges on viewing LUNA as a security. However, Shin’s legal representatives maintained that under the Korean Capital Markets Act, LUNA isn’t a security, making its trades non-fraudulent.To counter a US court ruling the prosecution presented — that a token is a security — Shin’s defense highlighted that the verdict is from a lower court and remains contested. Earlier, prosecutors had cited a ruling from the United States Southern District Court of New York, which classified the XRP tokens sold to institutional investors as securities.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 08, 2023

Saudi Arabia Looks to Diversify Through Web3

Saudi Arabia Looks to Diversify Through Web3Saudi Arabia is intensifying its efforts to diversify its economy as part of its ambitious Vision 2030 initiative. In a move away from its traditional reliance on oil, the kingdom is embracing cutting-edge technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) and is delving into the burgeoning gaming industry.That’s the view of Animoca Brands Co-Founder Yat Siu, who, in a recent interview with Cointelegraph, highlighted Saudi Arabia’s keen interest in Web3, emphasizing the country’s partnerships with entities like The Sandbox and Animoca itself.Photo by Hala AlGhanim on UnsplashDriving gaming growthSiu believes that Saudi Arabia is making a concerted effort to explore the possibilities of the new iteration of the internet, particularly in the realm of Web3 gaming and blockchain gaming, where asset ownership is verified on the blockchain. He stated:“I think Saudi [Arabia] understands the principle that Web3 gaming or blockchain gaming — the one that we actually prove the owner assets — is going to be the future of gaming.”While Saudi Arabia has yet to make a significant global impact in game and AI development, experts in the emerging field of Web3 believe that the kingdom’s investments in gaming could have far-reaching implications.The Boston Consulting Group reported that Saudi Arabia accounts for 45% of the region’s gaming sector, with a total value exceeding $1.8 billion. It also boasts one of the highest game revenues in the area, according to Ireland-based gaming content creator, Allcorrect.$38 billion gaming fundSiu is not the only one to believe in the efficacy of Saudi’s Web3 efforts. Poland-based Web3 gaming platform GameSwift also articulated a similar view recently. In a tweet thread published last month, the firm acknowledged the $38 billion gaming fund launched by the Saudi royal family.That initiative involves a Gaming Hub, the first incubator for esports in the world. The objective of the hub is to empower early-stage studios and provide an accelerator program for their growth, with direct investment going to top ten studios.Cryptocurrency uncertaintyDespite its understanding of the high-level concept of Web3, Saudi Arabia faces uncertainties regarding the integration of cryptocurrencies and virtual assets into gaming due to the absence of clear regulations. Siu explained that while Saudi Arabia is proactive in investigating cryptocurrencies, other regions like Hong Kong, Japan, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) offer more clarity on what can be done with crypto and Web3.Siu noted that Saudi Arabia is actively seeking information on best practices and strategies from experts like Animoca. To encourage Web3 adoption, financial literacy is key, according to Siu.He emphasized that users must have a certain level of financial literacy to fully embrace Web3, as it goes beyond traditional banking. Understanding the potential value of digital assets and their network effects is crucial for Web3 users.Saudi Arabia is not the only Gulf nation to pivot to Web3. Oman is looking to do likewise based on similar rationale — to diversify away from an oil-based economy. The UAE is also actively working towards creating the right conditions to nurture Web3 startup businesses.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 28, 2023

Zipmex Thailand halts crypto trading citing SEC compliance

Zipmex Thailand halts crypto trading citing SEC complianceTroubled cryptocurrency exchange Zipmex Thailand has recently announced the temporary suspension of digital asset trading until early next year.Photo by Anh Tuan To on UnsplashTrading and deposits suspendedThe decision, outlined by the firm in a Facebook post on Saturday, is attributed to the platform’s efforts in ensuring full compliance with the standards set by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).In the Facebook post, Zipmex Limited addressed its customers, stating:“Dear customers, Zipmex Limited would like to ensure the proper and compliant conduct of the company’s business operations in accordance with the criteria set by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).”The suspension of digital asset trading and deposits of all types became effective from Nov. 25.Withdrawals remain openDespite the suspension, customers will retain the ability to withdraw Thai baht and digital assets from their Trade Wallet through the website and mobile application until Jan. 31, 2024. However, for digital assets categorized as “Trade Only,” customers are instructed to contact Customer Support for withdrawal. Beyond Jan. 31, 2024, when the withdrawal feature through the website and mobile application is suspended, customers will need to seek assistance from Customer Support.Zipmex Thailand also emphasized that the withdrawal process for digital assets may take between seven to 14 days, requiring customers to provide supporting documents for identity and account ownership verification.As a cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in Singapore and operating in multiple countries, including Thailand, Australia and Indonesia, Zipmex has already fallen foul of Thailand’s SEC. Earlier this year, it was hit with penalties related to allegations of improper use of a digital asset custodian service and the redirection of customers to the Singapore-based exchange, Zipmex Pte, creating a conflict of interest.Financial difficultiesThe exchange has faced financial challenges, including difficulties in repaying creditors after losses incurred from exposure to crypto lenders Babel Finance and Genesis in 2022. A planned $100 million buyout earlier in the year fell through when the buyer, reportedly V Ventures, withdrew from the purchase.Zipmex’s troubles date back to last summer when the exchange halted withdrawals due to volatile market conditions and a liquidity crunch resulting from exposure to the troubled crypto lender Babel Finance. Despite facing financial difficulties, the exchange expressed its commitment to maintaining the integrity of its platform.In August of the same year, Bloomberg reported that Zipmex intended to meet with potential investors and Thailand’s financial regulator to discuss a recovery plan. By November, the platform was in advanced discussions with venture capital fund V Ventures for the sale of a majority stake.Earlier this year, the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission announced an investigation into whether Zipmex breached local rules in its offering of certain digital-asset products. In April, the company filed a request to extend the moratorium period to enable the firm to work towards restructuring. Later that month, it appeared that the V Ventures investment deal had fallen through. By July, the beleaguered firm had sued the investor for breach of contract.The ongoing challenges faced by Zipmex underscore the complex landscape and regulatory scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges in various jurisdictions.

news
Loading