Dunamu likely to extend CEO Lee’s tenure, ensuring continuity in Upbit leadership

Indonesia’s Financial Regulator Appoints Hasan Fawzi to Oversee CryptoThe Financial Services Authority (OJK) of Indonesia has chosen Hasan Fawzi, a former executive of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), as the head of fintech and digital assets oversight and innovation.That’s according to a number of reports published in local and regional news outlets on Thursday. Fawzi, who has served as the Director of the Indonesia Bond Pricing Agency (IBPA) since 2008, brings a wealth of experience in the securities pricing sector. Alongside Fawzi, Lodewik Paulus Agusman, previously responsible for the internal audit department at Bank Indonesia, has also been elected as a member of the OJK Board of Commissioners. These appointments were approved by the House of Representatives Commission overseeing banking and finance.Photo by Tom Fisk on PexelsDigital asset oversightFawzi’s role as the Executive Director for the Supervision of Technological Innovation in the Financial Sector, Digital Financial Assets, and Crypto-assets places him in charge of overseeing peer-to-peer lending platforms, cryptocurrencies, and other components of the evolving industry.Indonesia’s stance on cryptocurrencies remains complex and multi-faceted. While the country is striving to launch a state-backed crypto exchange by mid-2023, as announced by Didid Noordiatmoko, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), recent statements by Bali Governor Wayan Koster suggest a tightening of regulations concerning crypto payments.Governor Koster emphasized that foreign tourists who use cryptocurrencies for payments, violate visa provisions, or engage in unauthorized activities will face strict consequences. The Bali Representative Office of Bank Indonesia reiterated that while cryptocurrencies themselves are legal in Indonesia, their use as a payment instrument is not.The appointment of Hasan Fawzi to OJK demonstrates Indonesia’s strategic efforts to strengthen oversight and foster innovation within the fintech and digital asset sectors. Fawzi’s extensive experience in securities pricing and leadership in the Indonesia Stock Exchange make him a valuable addition to the regulatory landscape. As Indonesia navigates the complexities of cryptocurrency usage, it will be fascinating to observe the evolution of regulations and how the country’s financial authorities shape the future of the industry.Controlled innovationThese recent developments highlight Indonesia’s determination to stay at the forefront of financial technology albeit with efforts to retain strict controls over the rollout of that innovation. The country recognizes the importance of effectively regulating emerging technologies while fostering an environment conducive to innovation. With Fawzi at the helm of fintech and digital assets oversight, the OJK aims to strike a balance that protects investors and consumers while promoting technological advancement.As these appointments await final approval from President Joko Widodo, the financial industry and crypto enthusiasts will closely watch Indonesia’s regulatory landscape. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the future of fintech and crypto in the country. Indonesia’s approach to this dynamic sector serves as a case study for other nations seeking to establish oversight and embrace the potential of digital assets. Their international regulatory peers will be monitoring efforts in Indonesia to bring about effective regulation of the digital assets space.

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

Korean Blockchain Firm Ozys Achieves ISMS Certification for Data SecuritySouth Korean blockchain technology firm Ozys has recently demonstrated its advanced security capabilities by securing a data security certificate from a quasi-governmental agency responsible for overseeing the nation’s internet services.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashCertificate from Korea Internet and Security AgencyOzys made an announcement on Friday (local time) that it has earned a certificate of Information Security Management System (ISMS) from the Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA). The ISMS certification requires companies to meet 80 distinct criteria. Through these criteria, companies must demonstrate their approach to setting up and maintaining data security systems, as well as their plans for handling possible security incidents.Specializing in Web3 services, the blockchain developer offers a wide range of solutions related to decentralized finance (DeFi), cross-chain projects, and blockchain explorers.Smart contract developmentOzys has secured an ISMS certification specifically for blockchain-based smart contract development and service operations. Ozys is the first company in the country to attain this distinction in the realm of smart contract development.On this achievement, Choi Jin-han, CEO of Ozys, said that undergoing the ISMS certification process allowed the company to reassess its overarching security policies, bolstering its protective measures and response strategies for information assets. Choi further emphasized Ozys’ dedication to creating not just functional and user-friendly services, but also to pursuing various research initiatives focused on safeguarding customers.