Coins.ph partners with Paxos to further PYUSD adoption

Taiwan Advances Crypto Regulation with Initial Reading of Digital Asset BillTaiwan has furthered its efforts on the path of digital asset regulation, as the nation’s legislature introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.The “Virtual Asset Management Ordinance Draft” bill represents a significant stride toward establishing a legal framework for digital assets in the country. The proposal passed its first reading at the Taiwanese state legislature, according to published parliamentary records.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashBill objectivesThe primary objectives of the bill are to define virtual assets, establish operational standards for asset operators, enhance customer protection, and make it mandatory for industry players to join relevant associations and secure regulatory permissions.Up until now, Taiwan has maintained a relatively hands-off approach to the cryptocurrency sector. Its oversight was limited to existing know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) laws. However, this stance evolved following the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX in November. The platform’s popularity among Taiwanese users, owing to favorable US dollar interest rates compared to local banks, led to increased regulatory scrutiny.A member of Taiwan’s parliament, Yung-Chang Chiang, told The Block that “after the first reading of the bill, discussions on the regulatory framework for the virtual asset industry have progressed to the next stage.” Chiang added:“We hope that the Financial Supervisory Commission can also submit their version of a draft bill to the legislature, allowing various sectors of society to further consolidate consensus during the process.”In contrast to cryptocurrency regulations in neighboring Hong Kong, Taiwan’s bill does not adopt a strong stance on derivatives or stablecoins. Nevertheless, it recognizes that derivatives linked to virtual assets possess unique characteristics, with a specific mention of perpetual contracts. This recognition opens the door for the possibility of cryptocurrency derivative-specific regulation in future drafts.Importantly, the bill does not restrict the trading of virtual assets to professional investors, which allows broader participation in the digital asset market.Auditing and segregation of fundsUnlike Japan, which mandates the use of custodians for locally licensed exchanges, the draft bill in Taiwan only necessitates the segregation of customer assets from business funds. It does not explicitly require the involvement of third-party custodians.Under this legislation, exchange operators will be obliged to commission periodic reports from accountants regarding their operations and asset management. Additionally, regulators, such as the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), will have the authority to conduct regular inspections of exchange internal control and audit systems.Although this initial draft does not explicitly mention “Proof of Reserves,” it does indicate that the regulator will establish standards for asset ratios after consulting with industry stakeholders, with the expectation that licensed exchanges will adhere to these standards.Fostering self regulationTaiwan’s crypto industry stakeholders have expressed their support for formal regulatory oversight. Wayne Huang, co-founder and CEO of Taipei-based fintech company XREX, recently affirmed the industry’s willingness to collaborate with the FSC in defining regulatory operations.In tandem with the establishment of a regulatory framework, regulators have indicated that they want industry stakeholders to move towards some level of self-regulation. That led nine exchange businesses to form an industry association last month.The bill’s second reading is pending, and the FSC is anticipated to provide its input and recommendations before the next phase of the legislative process.

Korean Crypto Exchanges Struggle Despite Market RecoveryThe results of a recent study by the South Korean Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) released on Monday revealed that ten domestic cryptocurrency exchanges have reported zero revenue from transaction fees, with half of them struggling to achieve a daily average trading volume of KRW 1 million ($740).Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashTrends of growth and declineThe study looked into data from 35 registered virtual asset service providers (VASPs) for the first half of this year. The findings showed that compared to the second half of last year, the crypto market capitalization and Korean won deposits increased, but exchanges faced growing challenges, illustrated by a widening gap between leading fiat-to-crypto exchanges and smaller crypto-only exchanges.In the first half of this year, the operating profit of won-based exchanges reached KRW 259.8 billion (approximately $193 million), a 46% increase compared to the second half of last year, which recorded KRW 177.9 billion. In contrast, crypto exchanges recorded an operating loss of KRW 32.5 billion. Notably, out of 21 crypto-only exchanges, 10 of them reported no revenue at all from transaction fees, and 18 were in a state of complete capital impairment. Meanwhile, the operating profit of won-based exchanges was concentrated among the country’s top two exchanges, Upbit and Bithumb.But from a broader perspective, as of the end of June, this year’s total capitalization of the crypto market reached KRW 28.4 trillion — a 46% increase compared to the end of the second half of last year. Korean won deposits also increased by KRW 400 billion, or 11%, compared to the previous half. The overall operating profit was KRW 227.3 billion, up 82% from KRW 124.9 billion at the end of the second half of last year.“The first half of this year saw a rise in prices of virtual assets and investor sentiment, leading to an increase in Korean won deposits, overall market capitalization, and operating profits for exchanges, compared to the second half of 2022,” the FIU remarked.The number of new listings and delistings on virtual asset exchanges also surged with 169 new listings and 115 new delistings. These represented a more than double increase and a 47% increase, respectively, compared to the second half of last year. 66% of the delisted crypto assets were coins that had been exclusively listed on a given exchange.Despite the market’s recovery, trading volume and the number of users have slightly decreased. The daily average trading volume in the domestic crypto market for the first half of this year was KRW 2.9 trillion, down 1.3% compared to the second half of 2022. In addition, the number of registered accounts with VASPs also dropped by 19% to 9.5 million compared to the end of last year. This can be attributed to a growing number of dormant accounts and the removal of duplicate accounts.The quantity of verified users has also declined. The number of individuals and corporations that had completed the mandatory Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures needed to engage in trading decreased by 210,000 to 6.06 million (including duplicates) compared to the end of 2022. The majority of users, or those who own less than KRW 1 million in virtual assets, dropped by 7%.On the other hand, the amount of virtual assets leaving the country increased. In the first half of this year, a total of KRW 22.1 trillion was transferred to whitelisted overseas operators or individual wallet addresses, marking a KRW 500 billion increase compared to the second half of last year. This trend could be accredited to futures trading and arbitrage trading influenced by the so-called “kimchi premium” — a term used to describe the difference between trading prices of cryptocurrencies in Korea and in other foreign exchanges.Age demographicsOther findings showed that the age group that traded the most virtual assets is in their 30s, accounting for 30% of all users. Within this group, men make up 70%, with 1.27 million men recorded as engaging in crypto trading. Following closely with 1.2 million, men in their 40s were the second-largest demographic.

HKMA reflects on retail CBDC pilot phase one completionHong Kong’s Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Chinese territory’s central bank, recently released a report following the completion of phase one of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot, highlighting the potential benefits of a retail CBDC, commonly referred to as e-HKD (digital Hong Kong dollar).Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashUndecided on full implementationIn a press release published by the HKMA on Monday, the authority clarified that the report underscores that while a retail CBDC could bring value to the payments ecosystem and unlock new economic transaction possibilities, in-depth investigation and evaluation are essential before considering large-scale implementation.At this stage, Hong Kong’s central bank has not committed to introducing an e-HKD, but the report sheds light on the prospects and challenges associated with such a move. The region has been signaling its intent to position itself as a hub for virtual assets, evident in the regulatory framework introduced in June and the granting of licenses to crypto trading platforms in August.Project e-HKD, initiated by the HKMA in 2021, is a significant step toward assessing the feasibility of a digital Hong Kong dollar. The pilot program was launched in November 2022 as part of the HKMA's “Fintech 2025” strategy. However, the HKMA remains cautious, as reflected in the comments of HKMA CEO Eddie Yue earlier this month. Yue told the South China Morning Post that the central bank is still waiting for greater clarity when it comes to the technological, legal and societal aspects of full implementation.Three core attributes identifiedThe report identifies three primary areas where an e-HKD could provide value: programmability, tokenization and atomic settlement. These attributes could lead to faster, more cost-efficient and more inclusive transactions. However, it’s essential to note that the 14 pilot programs conducted with 16 participating firms during phase one were executed on a small scale within a controlled environment.The phase one review highlights that the true potential and prerequisites for implementing an e-HKD on a larger scale depend on market developments and further investigation. It acknowledges that minor issues identified during the pilot phase could become more prominent or even unacceptable in a production environment.Gearing up for phase twoPhase one of the pilot program delved into various aspects, including full-fledged payments, offline payments, tokenized deposits, programmable payments and the settlement of Web3 transactions and tokenized assets. Hong Kong is now gearing up for phase two of the pilot, with plans to explore new use cases for an e-HKD and engage in more focused pilot initiatives. The goal is to understand how the e-HKD can facilitate innovative methods of transacting goods and services while maintaining financial stability.The HKMA’s stance on a retail CBDC places it at the center of a global debate. While the U.S. remains undecided on the issue, with the topic becoming contentious in presidential elections, India has forged ahead with plans for a retail CBDC. Meanwhile, Thailand’s central bank commenced a pilot project for a retail CBDC earlier this year.