Lillius selected to join Cronos Accelerator Program

Venture Smart Financial Holdings Ltd. (VSFG), a Hong Kong-based financial services company, is gearing up to initiate an exchange-traded fund (ETF) directly investing in bitcoin in the first quarter of this year.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashThat’s according to a report by Bloomberg on Friday. The move aligns with Hong Kong's strategic efforts to establish itself as a digital asset hub, and with that, the company plans to submit an application to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) for ETF approval. Brian Chan, the group head of investment and product at VSFG, expressed optimism about the potential of this market, setting a goal of achieving $500 million in assets under management by the end of the year. Long-term objectiveWhile the firm has taken the decision to focus on spot crypto ETFs amid a backdrop of spot bitcoin ETF approval in the United States earlier this month, it’s an objective the firm has been working on for some time. In June of last year, crypto media reported that VSFG were planning the launch of such a product. Notwithstanding that intention, the recent launch of several high-profile bitcoin funds in the United States, including offerings from BlackRock and Fidelity Investments, will likely assist the company in getting product approval in Hong Kong. Immediately following U.S. approval, a Hong Kong lawmaker suggested that the Chinese autonomous territory should respond proactively. Johnny Ng outlined that Hong Kong had to respond to secure its global position in developing the digital assets space in Hong Kong. Positive soundingsTowards the end of December, there appeared to be positive soundings on the possibility of spot bitcoin ETF approval in Hong Kong emerging from the local regulator. SFC CEO Julia Leung stated that the regulator was open to the notion of retail participation in spot crypto ETF products. Her comment was followed shortly afterwards by a joint announcement from the SFC alongside the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) that they were prepared to accept applications for such funds. The approval process for such products typically takes weeks to months, following the precedent of traditional ETFs. Hong Kong presently permits futures-based crypto ETFs, with three already listed: CSOP Bitcoin Futures, CSOP Ether Futures and Samsung Bitcoin Futures. However, these funds have a combined asset value of around $50 million. Samsung Asset Management has not ruled out exploring the launch of a spot ETF, while CSOP Asset Management remains silent on the matter. VSFG is one of Hong Kong's first SFC-approved virtual asset managers, offering both traditional and digital wealth management services. Aegis Custody, a digital asset custodian, is in discussions with four asset managers about listing spot crypto products in Hong Kong. The regulatory requirements in the city may lead issuers to impose higher fees compared to the low management levies seen in many new U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs. Although bitcoin experienced substantial growth in anticipation of these U.S. products, it has seen a 10% decline since their trading commenced on Jan. 11. Nevertheless, many industry commentators expect a stronger bitcoin unit price in the medium to long term as a direct consequence of these products. 

Terraform Labs fails to halt class action lawsuitThe High Court in Singapore has dismissed an appeal filed by Terraform Labs and its co-founders, marking a significant step forward for the plaintiffs behind a class action initiated against the company.That’s according to a report published by Singaporean publication, the Business Times, on Thursday. The legal development follows the collapse of TerraUSD (UST) tokens in May of 2022, resulting in the loss of billions of dollars in market value. The collapse, in turn, has led to several lawsuits against Terraform, its founders and affiliated entities, with those court actions playing out in courtrooms in Singapore, South Korea, Montenegro and the United States.Photo by Wesley Tingey on UnsplashFraudulent misrepresentation allegedThe class-action suit, initiated in September 2022 by Julian Moreno Beltran and Douglas Gan on behalf of 375 others, alleges fraudulent misrepresentation by Terraform, Co-Founders Do Kwon and Nikolaos Alexandros Platias and the Luna Foundation Guard (LFG). The claimants argue that these misrepresentations induced them to purchase UST, stake the tokens and retain them as their value plummeted.UST had been designed to be pegged to the U.S. dollar with a 1:1 ratio. However, flaws in the tokenomics behind that digital asset meant that it faced a loss of confidence in May 2022, trading at around $0.05 when the court’s decision was released. The claimants collectively suffered losses of nearly $57 million.Terms of use cited in attempt to dismissTerraform attempted to have the lawsuit dismissed by invoking an arbitration clause in its website’s terms of use, asserting that users had waived their rights to a jury trial or participation in a class action. However, the Assistant Registrar (AR) rejected this application, stating that the defendants failed to establish an arbitration agreement.The AR highlighted that the terms of use were inconspicuous on the website, and there was insufficient effort to draw users’ attention to those clauses. Terraform, Kwon and associated entities appealed this decision, which was heard by Justice Hri Kumar Nair on Sept. 25.Despite establishing a prima facie case for an arbitration agreement, the court ruled that Terraform’s participation in the legal proceedings, including filing a defense and counterclaim, meant it could no longer seek a stay in favor of arbitration.Multiple actionsIt’s a busy time for all stakeholders relative to the Terraform collapse. Playing out within the same timeframe is a lawsuit in the United States taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Terraform and Do Kwon, where the SEC claims that crypto asset securities fraud has been carried out.The latest installments in that saga in recent weeks have seen both parties file to seek summary judgment. Last week, a court in New York approved the confidential treatment of specific documentation which had been produced by Jump Crypto, a division of proprietary trading firm Jump Trading.There are also criminal actions underway. In a South Korean court in October, Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin denied wrongdoing in the Terra/Luna collapse. Meanwhile, a court in Montenegro has approved the extradition of Do Kwon, with a final decision to be made shortly as regards whether he should be extradited to the United States or South Korea.

Bank of Japan Publishes Results of CBDC PoCThe Bank of Japan (BoJ) recently concluded the second phase of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) proof of concept (PoC) project, which began in April. The results of this phase were published on Monday, and they shed light on key aspects such as the comparison between account-based and token-based CBDCs and the management of holding limits for users with multiple accounts.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashToken-based CBDCsThe experiments conducted by the central bank covered a wide range of topics. Among the most intriguing findings were the advantages and disadvantages of token-based CBDCs and how to effectively impose holding limits for users with multiple CBDC balances.Token-based CBDCs have garnered interest from various central banks, with some adopting the UTXO token model used by Bitcoin without the use of a distributed ledger. A UTXO or unspent transaction output, defines where a blockchain transaction starts and finishes. The Bank of Japan explored this model and analyzed its pros and cons.In the initial proof of concept, both account-based and token-based CBDCs were examined, considering scenarios where the central bank managed the ledger or shared it with intermediaries like banks. In the token-based model, fixed token denominations were used, similar to physical cash in countries like India, and a centralized ledger was employed. However, in the recent phase, the central bank utilized flexible value tokens similar to UTXO and shared ledger functions with intermediaries.The Bank of Japan favored the flexible value token model due to its ability to handle multiple requests simultaneously. However, it acknowledged that this model may require more technical resources compared to the account-based approach. Challenges may arise when implementing additional functions, such as holding limits, while maintaining optimal performance. The European Central Bank (ECB) also noted in a recent report that most payment providers are accustomed to account-based payments and would incur costs to adapt to token-based systems.Another significant aspect explored by the BoJ was how to impose holding limits when users have multiple CBDC balances through different intermediaries. The challenge lies in determining if the overall holding limit has been breached without compromising user privacy.Homomorphic encryptionOne possible solution discussed in the report is the use of homomorphic encryption, which enables computations to be performed on encrypted data without it first needing to be decrypted. That allows for the necessary checks without intermediaries accessing the specific data being checked. Although this solution may slightly increase processing time, it could introduce a higher risk of data inconsistencies.Alternatively, a simpler approach proposed by the central bank is to establish a per-account holding limit and a limit on the number of accounts a single user can hold, rather than imposing global limits. Ideally, users with multiple accounts would have a higher per-account holding limit compared to those with fewer accounts.Phase 3 underwayWith the next pilot phase already underway, the BoJ aims to test the end-to-end process flow and identify challenges related to integrating with external systems. Additionally, they are creating a CBDC Forum to gather input from the private sector, ensuring a collaborative approach to CBDC development.While investigation and research into CBDCs continues, the BoJ has said that it will make a final decision on CBDC implementation by 2026.