Finger Labs to leverage Web3 services for Dream Ladders’ college entrance briefing

China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has stepped into the realm of the metaverse by forming a working group tasked with setting standards for the burgeoning technology.Photo by Li Yang on UnsplashChinese corporate participationThe announcement, made on Friday, revealed that the working group would comprise representatives from the government, academic institutions and major corporations. In its statement, MIIT explained that the establishment of the metaverse working group aligns with the nation's emphasis on industrial development within the technology sector. Notably, the group will feature key figures from major Chinese tech corporations, including Huawei, Ant Group, ZET, Tencent, Baidu, NetEase, Sense Time and others. Public feedback on the selection of group members is invited until Feb. 18, although the specific areas of focus for the group are not detailed in the document. Initial in-roadsThe working group’s headline tech participants have all made some initial in-roads into metaverse technology. Baidu established its own metaverse project, XiRang, in 2021. Late last year it partnered with Qualcomm on the use of extended reality (XR) technology for use on a new metaverse platform. Huawei is paying attention to the promising metaverse space by building up a catalog of metaverse-related patents. Like Baidu, Tencent is focusing on developing XR technology with metaverse development in mind. Last year NetEase collaborated with a Chinese liquor brand to launch a winery-themed metaverse, while issuing NFTs linked to liquor bottles. Establishing metaverse standardsChina has been contemplating the formulation of metaverse standards for some time. In September 2023, MIIT advocated for the creation of a dedicated working group to address the ongoing challenges in metaverse technology. The government's overarching objective is to ensure the healthy and orderly development of the metaverse industry through standardization and guidance, reducing redundant investment costs and fostering collaborative forces for industrial development. Analysts from JPMorgan foresee a potential uptick in the value of Chinese tech stocks if the metaverse gains traction in the country. According to their analysis, Chinese web giants like Tencent and NetEase stand to benefit significantly from metaverse development. Even non-web companies such as China Mobile, Sony and Agora could witness positive impacts should the technology gain widespread adoption. In fact, China Mobile led the development of a metaverse industry alliance in China in 2023. Regional developmentIn a December document, MIIT outlined plans to formulate strategy documents clarifying the development path of Web3.Last year, several local governments in China committed to the development of the metaverse industry. Sichuan, a province once known as a crypto mining hub, aims to reach a market size of 250 billion yuan ($35.1 billion) in the metaverse industry by 2025. Last May, the city of Zhengzhou announced policy proposals to support metaverse companies. The same month, the province of Henan established a $21.7 million fund to support metaverse-related projects. The following month, an initiative was established in Nanjing to nurture metaverse development. Additionally, Shandong province has plans to grow its metaverse-related initiatives to achieve a market size of 150 billion yuan by 2025. 

MAS and NY Fed Publish Report on CBDC Cross-Border PaymentsNew York’s Federal Reserve Bank and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) have collaborated on an endeavor titled “Project Cedar Phase II x Ubin+,” examining the use of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) for wholesale cross-border payments using one or more vehicle currencies.The joint effort has culminated in the publication of a report detailing their findings and results. Commenting on the initiative, MAS Managing Director Leong Sing Chiong stated:“The Cedar x Ubin+ experiment envisages a future digital currency landscape where central banks can enable interoperability of wholesale CBDCs to facilitate more efficient cross-border payment flows including for less liquid currencies, without requiring a common infrastructure.”Photo by NASA on UnsplashExploiting positive DLT characteristicsSpecifically, the New York Innovation Center (NYIC) of the NY Fed was the entity that contributed directly towards the research project. The work built on previous phases of Project Cedar. The objective was to explore perceived advantages of digital ledger technology (DLT) such as reduced settlement risk and reduced settlement time, in the context of cross-border payments.The conventional system primarily uses the SWIFT financial messaging network. The approach is highly inefficient. It’s time-consuming and needlessly ties capital up in vostro and nostro accounts (accounts held for another entity from an account another entity holds). Tying up capital proves to be a liquidity headache for corporations and any business entity that gets involved with international trade settlement.Smart contracts and off-chain messagingAgainst that backdrop, the project team was focusing on harnessing the ability to effect atomic or real-time settlement using DLT. Having commenced the work in November, the project team decided to rely on hashed timelock smart contracts in order to bridge distinct ledgers, so as to effect cross-currency and cross-border transactions.According to the report, the proposed system also relied on off-chain messaging functionality. Cross-border trade settlement often involves a number of stakeholders. Off-chain messaging can be beneficial in disseminating information relative to the process to all stakeholders.The researchers found that each simulated payment scenario achieved end-to-end settlement in under thirty seconds on average, realizing the goal of near real-time settlement. In turn, that speed of settlement meant that stakeholders could be notified of payment finality within a matter of seconds. Certainty of settlement, and thus reduction in counterparty risk was achieved by simulating atomic settlement, such that transactions only settled if all legs in the cross-currency payment chain executed successfully.From the point of view of interoperability and autonomy, the experiment demonstrated the ability to safely execute across multiple ledgers without the need to involve a centralized clearing authority or the establishment of a shared central network.The Bank of International Settlement (BIS) recently highlighted the finding that on a daily basis, $2.2 trillion of foreign exchange transactions don’t use a payment versus payment (PvP) settlement mechanism. PvP is a less risky form of settlement where two currency legs are exchanged simultaneously. Singapore is more exposed than most in this regard. Therefore, the use of DLT to counteract that risk in line with the experiment’s findings would be a progressive step.

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South KoreaThe number of arbitrage transactions between South Korean and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges has been experiencing a notable uptick, according to a report by local media outlet Maeil Business Newspaper.In recent developments, foreign actors engaging in price manipulation have been transferring substantial amounts of cryptocurrency assets to Korean exchanges, driving up prices. Subsequently, they transfer these tokens from Korean exchanges back to overseas platforms, capitalizing on the price discrepancies to generate profits.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashBithumb’s case in H1According to documents submitted to Kim Hee-gon, a member of the ruling political party People Power Party, on Monday, KRW 3.4 trillion ($2.6 billion) worth of tokens were moved from Bithumb, a leading Korean cryptocurrency exchange, to foreign trading platforms during the first half of this year. Although this figure marks a 40% decrease compared to H1 2022’s KRW 5.7 trillion, primarily due to the significant decline in token prices across the cryptocurrency market, it’s noteworthy that the number of transactions has seen a significant increase.Other exchangesGopax, another major exchange in the nation, recorded token outflows totaling KRW 12.3 billion. On the other hand, Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit, which are also prominent exchanges, declined to provide data due to reasons like confidentiality concerns. However, given that Upbit holds an 82.0% share of the Korean crypto market, nearly four times larger than Bithumb’s share (14.2%), it is suspected that the volume of tokens transferred from Upbit to foreign platforms would likely have followed a similar proportion.While the value of tokens sent from Bithumb to overseas operators saw a year-over-year decrease, the number of transactions surged to 231,302, nearly doubling the figure of H1 2022’s 124,048 transactions. The average transaction size was KRW 14.7 million.Even though the overall enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies might have cooled off since last year, the spike in the number of transactions suggests that there’s been a surge in arbitrage trading between Korea and foreign markets.Kimchi premiumEarlier this month, a significant transaction caught the eye of cryptocurrency market observers in South Korea. On September 1, crypto data analytics firm Arkham identified that 170,000 CyberConnect (CYBER) tokens were transferred to Bithumb from a crypto wallet thought to be owned by DWF Labs, a firm specializing in cryptocurrency trading and investment. The timing of the transaction coincides with a period during which the Kimchi premium for CYBER exceeded 100%. The Kimchi premium refers to the crypto price gap between Korean exchanges and their foreign counterparts.The complicating factor here is that DWF Labs is a foreign entity that is managed by a foreign team.The use of corporate accounts is virtually prohibited in the Korean crypto market. The Travel Rule mandates that any transfers of tokens between Korean and international exchanges must go through accounts that have been verified under Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. Given these regulations, there are growing suspicions within the crypto community that foreign venture capitalists may have used accounts in borrowed names to conduct sales on Korean exchanges, which are restricted to Korean citizens. However, it’s worth noting that there is currently no legal basis for taking punitive action even if borrowed-name accounts were indeed used.Lawmaker Kim commented on the limitations of current financial regulations aimed at preventing money laundering in the cryptocurrency market. Despite efforts by financial authorities, including the introduction of the Travel Rule, Kim stated that these measures have not been very effective. He emphasized the urgency of enhancing the regulatory framework to curb potential illicit activities involving cryptocurrencies, such as those exploiting market arbitrage opportunities.