OKX Ventures invests in Web3 infrastructure startup

Beleaguered Indian crypto exchange WazirX took to social media on April 21 to clarify to the company’s creditors that it is moving closer towards restarting the platform. While the company hasn’t gone into bankruptcy following a $230 million platform hack which occurred in July of last year, it is going through a restructuring process via the Singapore High Court. Posting on the X social media platform, the company addressed concerns surrounding the restarting of operations.  It said that it understood that users were keen to see the platform restart, while reminding stakeholders that from the outset of the process, it had forecasted a first distribution of user funds and a restart of the platform within the April to May 2025 timeframe. Photo by matthew6910 on UnsplashMay court hearingThe firm outlined that its parent company, Zettai PTE Limited, has accomplished all steps to date, in order to bring about the re-emergence of the platform. It has put forward a scheme of arrangement to the court to distribute assets available to it to creditors and bring the trading platform back online.  It identified a May 13 court date as being pivotal to these plans, when the Singapore High Court will hold a sanction hearing and determine whether it confirms the company’s restructuring plan. WazirX added: “While we’ve worked to stay aligned with the previously shared timelines, court proceedings operate independently, and we respect that process. After the Scheme is sanctioned, the First Distribution and restart will follow within 10 business days from the Effective Scheme Date, as outlined earlier.” 85% payoutEarlier this month, 93% of WazirX creditors, accounting for 94.6% of the overall funds owed, voted in favor of the company’s restructuring plan. As part of the plan, users would be compensated with a payout over several distributions of 85% of the overall funds they held on the platform as of July 18, 2024. The company also plans to issue creditors with a recovery token, in an effort to provide them with further value over time. This communication from the company followed the announcement of a court judgement last week by India’s Supreme Court dismissing a lawsuit filed by 54 WazirX users who have lost funds due to the 2024 hack. While the action was dismissed, one of the plaintiffs pointed out on X that the Supreme Court hadn’t indicated that their action lacked merit. He added:”Our criminal writ petition against #WazirX & Nischal Shetty & others was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.” On that basis, it would appear that the company may still have to deal with such a complaint if brought via a different forum. Over the course of the past 12 months, the WazirX hack stands out alongside an almost $1.5 billion hack at Bybit. In both cases, fingers have been pointed at notorious North Korean hacking group, Lazarus. According to a report published by Chainalysis last December, $2.2 billion had been stolen from crypto platforms in 2024.

Incheon Partners with Daehong to Implement Web3-Driven Urban Marketing StrategyIncheon Metropolitan City, renowned for its international airport in South Korea, has partnered with Daehong Communications, a marketing solutions subsidiary of the country’s retail giant Lotte Group, to leverage Web3 technology for the purpose of promoting the city.Daehong has established an extensive global network within the blockchain industry. Among its notable partners are layer 1 blockchain Aptos, Metaverse company Animoca Brands, and decentralized social protocol CyberConnect. One of Daehong’s primary initiatives is the NFT project associated with Bellygom, a pink bear character of Lotte Homeshopping, a media commerce affiliate of Lotte Group.Photo by Daesun Kim on UnsplashHarnessing blockchain for city promotionThrough this collaborative effort, Incheon aims to harness blockchain technology to explore innovative ways of promoting the city and building stronger connections with its residents.Incheon has recently been very dedicated to Web3 initiatives in promoting the city. Last month, it worked with The Sandbox, the virtual gaming platform of Animoca Brands, to create a metaverse representation of the Incheon Landing Operation to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the Korean War Armistice Agreement. More recently, the city unveiled its NFT membership program named “Incheon Heroes,” demonstrating its commitment to pioneering its unique path in the era of Web3.Daehong’s role in Web3 adoptionIn the private sector, Daehong has been working towards the widespread adoption of Web3. The marketing firm introduced business models that integrate NFTs into areas that have significant public engagement, such as ticketing, memberships, and brand characters. Daehong has been actively working to facilitate many brands’ entry into the Web3 space.Lee Se-woong, Brand Manager of Incheon City, anticipates that the collaboration with Daehong will serve as a fresh catalyst for Incheon, expressing excitement about the potential synergies between Incheon’s public infrastructure and Daehong’s industrial expertise.Incheon is set to initiate a range of projects by leveraging the Incheon Heroes NFT membership program and the Incheon Universe, a virtual space that allows visitors to immerse themselves in various facets of the city. Furthermore, the city is in the process of establishing collaborations with enterprises, brands, and artists who share a common interest in promoting the sustainability of both the planet Earth and the city itself.

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”