$100M funding sees HashKey unlock unicorn status

dtcpay, a regulated and licensed digital payment services provider headquartered in Singapore, has announced that it is changing direction, and adopting a stablecoin-only digital payments model. Phasing out Bitcoin, EtherThe company set out details of its new stablecoin-only approach in a series of posts on X on Dec. 3. dtcpay will phase out support for other cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ether by the end of 2024. It will then transition to the exclusive use of stablecoins, starting with Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USD Coin (USDC). Additionally, FDUSD, a U.S. dollar stablecoin issued by Hong Kong’s First Digital, and Worldwide USD (WUSD), a stablecoin which was developed by the Worldwide Stablecoin Payment Network (WSPN), a Singapore-based project, will be supported.Photo by CoinWire Japan on UnsplashVolatility issuesdtcpay cited the volatility of non-stablecoin cryptos as being an issue for payments. Volatility is driving the company’s plan to concentrate solely on stablecoins. Outlining its rationale further, the company stated: “By transitioning to focus dtcpay’s #DPT services purely on #stablecoins, we are setting the stage for the future of global, digital payments. This move is designed to provide our customers with a more reliable, scalable, & secure payment experience.” A significant portion of the firm’s transaction volume is already stablecoin-based. On that basis, the move can be viewed as aligning with the preferences of its current user base to a large extent. Originally established in 2019 by Alice Liu, Band Zhao and Sam Lin as Digital Treasures Center Pte. Ltd., the company later rebranded as dtcpay. In August 2022, the firm was awarded a full Major Payment Institution (MPI) license by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. In 2023, the company collaborated with Singaporean data-sharing platform PlatON and Chinese payments firm Allinpay, to launch a payments system using point-of-sale terminals which accepted Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT. Asian expansiondtcpay has set out its objective as aiming to unify payment methods across Asia for the benefit of merchants and consumers alike. Last year, it identified Hong Kong and Dubai as locations of particular interest relative to the company’s expansion plans. In October, it furthered its international presence with the opening of an office in Kuala Lumpur. In an effort to make further in-roads into the payments sector, dtcpay announced a strategic partnership with Visa in September. The integration allows dtcpay to gain access to Visa’s global network of 130 million merchants across 200 countries. As part of the partnership, the company is rolling out its dtcpay Visa Infinite card, enabling users to convert digital currencies to fiat at competitive rates. In 2023, the company raised $16.5 million in a pre-series A funding round led by real estate development company Pontiac Land Group, which is controlled by Singaporean billionaire Kwee Liong Tek.

Coinbit suspends operations, marking second crypto exchange shutdown this monthCoinbit, a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange operated by blockchain service provider AXIASOFT, has suspended its services according to an official announcement on its website posted on Thursday (local time). This development comes just over a year after it became a virtual asset service provider (VASP) on Sept. 1 last year. It is also the second crypto exchange in the country that has ended its operations after Cashierest on Nov. 6, indicating that troubled predictions previously projected by industry sources are becoming a reality.Photo by Andrew Winkler on UnsplashBusiness transitionCoinbit explained that, despite its efforts to create an environment optimized for transparent crypto transactions, it was pushed by ongoing changes in regulatory policies to make changes to its business. It intends to shift its focus to establishing a securitized transaction system.Membership registration and deposits will no longer be allowed starting at 5 p.m. next Friday. Transactions and withdrawal services will be suspended from 1 p.m. on Dec. 29. The exchange advised its users to withdraw their virtual assets accordingly.Earlier, it was reported that Coinbit was facing difficulties maintaining smooth operations due to its exceedingly low trading volume. Industry sources believe that the realization of the previously speculated closure of coin market exchanges.More shutdowns to come?“Much of the workforce at crypto exchanges have been taking hits, leading to challenging business conditions,” stated an unnamed industry expert, proposing conjecture that more announcements of service suspensions may be imminent. According to a survey conducted earlier this year by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), 10 out of 21 crypto exchanges reported zero revenue from transaction fees, and 18 were in a state of complete capital impairment.

Hong Kong Deems Crypto as PropertyIn dealing with a case involving defunct Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange Gatecoin, a Hong Kong judge has determined cryptocurrency as being property “capable of being held in trust.” Presiding over the case, Justice Linda Chan stated recently that Hong Kong takes a broad definition of what constitutes property.©Pexels/mitbg000Digital assets held in trustHaving expended efforts to try and recover funds from a former payments service provider that the company had partnered with, Gatecoin announced that it would shut down the business and commence the liquidation of the business in 2019. With bankruptcy proceedings being notoriously slow, that process continues today, resulting in Justice Chan’s recent determination.The notion of property held in trust is a common theme that has been explored in a number of cryptocurrency business bankruptcy processes recently, including the BlockFi, Celsius and FTX processes.Gatecoin has not proven to be any different in this regard. Liquidators had turned to the Hong Kong courts for direction as to how creditors’ digital assets, as held on the platform, should be defined. If property is deemed to have been held “in trust”, then that determination has implications for the owner of those assets relative to the bankruptcy proceedings.In the case of BlockFi, a determination was made in a US court that those who had simply custodied digital assets with the platform without earning any yield were property owners and that they should have their assets returned.The importance of Terms of Service (ToS)Alex Mashinsky, the founder and CEO of failed crypto lending competitor Celsius outlined to service users on a number of occasions that the assets remained their property even though his company used customer assets for various trading activities. The bankruptcy judge reached a different determination based on the terms of service. Service users had acknowledged in signing off on Celsius’ terms of service that assets held on the platform that accessed yield-bearing products became the property of Celsius when deposited within those products on the Celsius platform.Although it has not been dealt with yet, 1.4 million creditors relative to the bankruptcy process of failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX are likely to discover later this year if they can claim “in trust” property rights. An ad hoc group of creditors has taken legal action for the return of their digital assets on the basis of an assertion that the assets remained their property when transferred onto the platform.ImplicationsWhilst a seemingly uninteresting determination to anyone less informed about such bankruptcy proceedings, such decisions can have profound consequences. In a bankruptcy process, there is a hierarchy of creditors, with some having greater rights than others when it comes to the distribution of bankruptcy estate funds. Recognition of assets being held in trust as property would likely take those property owners out of the bankruptcy process, allowing the return of their funds (where available) while others who are classified as creditors get a distribution of whatever funds are left in the bankruptcy estate thereafter.Additional complexityGatecoin’s case was further complicated by the existence of various sets of terms of service. In two of the three instances, the court found that no trust language existed. There is one subset of creditors who may have the ability to claim their digital assets as property. The liquidators have agreed to identify them and contact them in that regard.While the process may be proving to be a minefield for Gatecoin’s creditors, it has served a broader purpose in crypto more generally as it has provided yet another opportunity for another jurisdiction, in this instance Hong Kong, to provide some more clarity with regard to the legal status and standing of cryptocurrency.