STELSI and Young Architects Forum Korea to host 38th Young Architects Forum in Seoul next week

Unprecedented surge in trading volumes on HashKey exchangeHong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange HashKey has experienced an unprecedented surge in daily trading volumes over the course of the past week, reaching approximately $4.5 billion, a notable increase from its usual levels.Photo by Jungwoo Hong on UnsplashToken rewards programThe surge, highlighted in a report published by The Block on Monday, occurred on Friday, and is being attributed to the company’s token rewards program, according to a spokesperson from HashKey Group.A HashKey Group spokesperson clarified that the surge in volumes was a result of the company’s recent HSK rewards campaigns, which involve the distribution of HSK tokens or EcoPoints. Introduced in April, these incentives were designed to encourage trading activity on the platform. The spokesperson emphasized the company’s commitment to operating within the regulatory framework, stating:“At HashKey, we operate strictly within the regulatory framework, and any actions of misconduct are not tolerated.”Last Thursday, HashKey issued a post on X (formerly known as Twitter), detailing one of its incentive campaigns. The post announced the introduction of a DOT/USD trading pair and encouraged users to explore additional ways to earn through ongoing campaigns. Despite receiving only 15 likes, the post aimed to attract users with the promise of HSK rewards for logging in, trading and participating in the platform’s campaigns.Licensing approval in AugustHashKey had obtained the first license to offer retail crypto trading in Hong Kong in August under the new regulatory regime, with an upgrade of its type 1 and type 7 licenses. Officially opening to traders on November 1, it quickly garnered attention in the crypto community. In the same month, it also launched an app, offering full mobile trading capabilities.While daily trading volumes on Sunday dropped to $275 million, still higher than the usual levels but closer to the volumes recorded in its initial month, the significant spike on Dec. 1 was particularly noteworthy. Comparatively, Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, recorded $11.3 billion in volume over the past 24 hours.Wash trading ruled outSpeculation arose on X regarding the possibility of wash trading contributing to the sudden surge in volumes. Wash trading involves intentionally matching a large number of orders to create artificial trading activity. However, HashKey’s spokesperson dismissed these claims, stating that no misconduct has been detected.Justin d’Anethan, Head of Business Development in Asia for Keyrock, a crypto market-making firm, commented on the situation, stating:“Many people in the crypto space assumed wash trading was taking place… But it’s almost unbelievable.”He noted that if one wanted to appear more active, it would be done gradually, rather than in a single surge.Market sentiment and trading volume trendOver the course of the past 24 hours, the Bitcoin unit price has surged from $39,500 to almost $42,000, with Asian trading believed to have contributed significantly to that trading momentum. The overall crypto market capitalization has reached $1.5 trillion for the first time since early 2022. Bitcoin trading volume over the past 24 hours hit $39 billion, with a bitcoin market dominance rate of 51%.

Japan Tops Crypto Losses to North Korean HackersHackers affiliated with the North Korean regime have been responsible for the theft of $721 million in digital assets from Japan.That’s the finding of a recent report by UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic. Elliptic had produced the report on behalf of Japanese news media group, Nikkei. It leaves Japan at the top of the table when considering the distribution of digital asset losses suffered due to North Korean hackers on a country by country basis.Photo by FLY:D on UnsplashIncreasing lossesElliptic has the wherewithal to track and identify blockchain-based transfers. As part of its analysis, it grouped by region and by country those businesses that it identified as having cryptocurrency holdings that later were transferred to digital wallets held by the Lazarus Group, the most notorious hacker group connected with the North Korean government. It’s the first such analysis to break down crypto-related hacking losses on a country by country basis.The study included a consideration of both hacking and ransomware attacks. The loss associated with Japanese-based entities represents in excess of 30% of the global recorded loss. This latest analysis follows a recent report submitted to the United Nations which found that North Korea stole more digital assets in 2022 than any other year. That report had been submitted to the 15 members of a North Korea sanctions committee, finding that between $630 million and $1 billion worth of digital assets had been stolen.Lax securityElliptic’s analysis and subsequent report point to lax security being employed within Vietnamese and Japanese cryptocurrency marketplaces. Nikkei referred to an unnamed source who asserts that at least three Japanese cryptocurrency exchanges had been compromised by hackers between 2018 and 2021.One of those instances involved Zaif, a company that lost $51.4 million in 2018 and subsequently shut down operations. Overall, Elliptic estimates a global loss of $2.3 billion to hackers between 2017 and 2022 in digital assets, as suffered by crypto firms. It also estimates such losses suffered in the United States at $497 million, while Hong Kong-based losses have been calculated at $281 million.International responseIn April, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) within the Department of the Treasury in the United States stated that it had sanctioned two Chinese nationals and a Hong Kong British national for allegedly having aided the North Korean government in crypto money laundering activities.On Saturday, a joint statement was issued by the Group of Seven finance ministers and central bank governors, following a meeting in Japan, outlining the “growing threat from illicit activities by state actors.” It’s widely believed that the proceeds of these hacks are contributing towards the funding of North Korea’s missile program and other such activities that threaten stability within the region.The Japan External Trade Organization (JETO) has estimated that the estimated $721 million stolen from Japan amounts to 8.8 times the value of North Korea’s exports in 2021.

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.