Terraform Labs files for bankruptcy in wake of $40 billion crash

South Korea’s GDAC Suffers $13M hackSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchange, GDAC, has suffered a significant hacking incident that has resulted in the loss of approximately 23% of its custodial digital assets.©Pexels/PixabayThe hack occurred on Sunday when some of the exchange’s hot wallets were breached, and the stolen assets were transferred to an unidentified wallet. GDAC reported the incident on Monday and disclosed that the exchange lost over $13.1 million in Bitcoin, Ether, Wemix, and USDT, with more than $10 million in Wemix.According to blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence, the hacker has since swapped the USDT for ETH, sending 461 ETH to cryptocurrency tumbler, Tornado Cash. The hacker used three separate wallets to take funds from two of the exchange’s hot wallets. Arkham has labeled the wallets as follows:GDAC Hacker 1: 0x244615D99684175d31369332039b2D84ce925EC5GDAC Hacker 2: 0x62B5eb2cb925Ce2898f9327B235b3228e7Cac1C2GDAC Hacker 3: 0x87597bDB421482190e223aCa0A4DEAd75AB0a98DGDAC deposits/withdrawals suspendedGDAC has suspended its withdrawal and deposit services and reported the incident to the Korea Internet and Security Agency and the Financial Intelligence Unit. The exchange has also requested other cryptocurrency exchanges to block incoming transactions from suspicious addresses.In a notice posted on its website, GDAC CEO Seunghwan Han apologized for the suspension of deposits/withdrawals and concern relative to the hack, adding that the firm will be working towards investor protection and safe withdrawal of funds in due course. GDAC also posted the breakdown of the digital asset quantities lost in the hack, with the hacker stealing 60.80 BTC, 350.5 ETH, 10,000 WEMIX and 220,000 USDT.Crypto hacks increasingThis hacking incident comes at a time when cryptocurrency hacks have been on the rise. According to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, illicit actors stole $3.8 billion worth of assets last year, the largest one-year loss in crypto’s history. In addition, other crypto platforms have also suffered notable hacks and exploits in the past 15 to 18 months. Axie Infinity’s Ronin bridge, for example, suffered a $625 million hack last year, and decentralized-finance protocol Sushi was exploited for $3.3 million on Sunday.GDAC is not the only South Korean cryptocurrency exchange to suffer a significant hacking incident. In 2018, Coinrail was hacked, resulting in the loss of approximately $40 million worth of assets, and in 2021, Upbit suffered a $50 million hack.In response to these incidents, South Korea has taken steps to tighten regulations around cryptocurrency exchanges. In March 2021, the country’s Financial Services Commission issued a revised regulation that requires cryptocurrency exchanges to maintain stricter anti-money laundering measures and report suspicious transactions.The GDAC hack is a stark reminder of the risks associated with cryptocurrency investing and the importance of implementing robust security measures. Investors and cryptocurrency exchanges should take note of this incident and ensure that they have adequate security measures in place to protect against potential hacks and exploits.

Gyeonggi Officials with Cryptocurrencies Clear of Professional Conflicts in Virtual AssetsGyeonggi Province, South Korea’s most populated province surrounding the national capital of Seoul, announced on October 26 (local time) that the duties of all crypto-holding officials ranked 4 or higher in the provincial government are not associated with virtual assets. In Korea, public officials are ranked from nine to one, with one being the highest position.In anticipation of the amended Public Service Ethics Act coming into effect on December 14, the Gyeonggi provincial government introduced a revised employee code of conduct in August. This required officials of rank 4 or higher to report their crypto holdings within 10 days starting from August 21.Photo by Nattu Adnan on UnsplashReported crypto ownershipThe result indicated that out of 228 officials, 23 reported owning virtual assets. Among these, 15 officials held cryptocurrencies valued at less than KRW 1 million ($738), while the remaining 8 had holdings exceeding that amount.To determine any potential involvement with cryptocurrencies in their official duties, the Gyeonggi government examined the roles and responsibilities of these officials within their respective departments. Following this review, the matter was forwarded to the Gyeonggi Public Service Ethics Committee for further scrutiny.Ethics committee reviewOn October 20, the committee convened to assess the relationship between the officials’ duties and their crypto holdings. They unanimously concluded that none of the 23 officials had any ties to crypto in their official roles.The newly revised code of conduct elaborates on the conditions under which a public official’s responsibilities are associated with virtual assets. Specifically, an official’s duties are considered linked to virtual assets if they are involved in formulating or implementing crypto-related policies or laws; conducting related investigations, inquiries, or inspections; engaging in the registration and oversight of cryptocurrency exchanges; or if they are involved in supporting or overseeing the development of crypto technologies.In light of these definitions, officials who engage in any of the above roles are strictly prohibited from capitalizing on any crypto-related information they encounter during their professional duties for personal trading or investment. Furthermore, officials who either currently shoulder or have previously carried out such responsibilities are required to disclose any crypto holdings they acquire.In the future, once the revised Ethics Act is implemented, the Gyeonggi government will remain fully committed to preventing conflicts of interest among public officials. To bolster these efforts, Gyeonggi will introduce additional measures, including a thorough verification process for the accuracy of their cryptocurrency holdings reports.In situations where a public official with cryptocurrency holdings is assigned a position related to virtual assets, Gyeonggi will issue individualized instructions. These directives may entail either the liquidation of their cryptocurrency holdings or their removal from the specific role in question.Meanwhile, Gyeonggi will enhance its endeavors to furnish educational resources pertaining to virtual asset reporting. Moreover, the local government will restrict officials from holding virtual assets if they fall under financial disclosure obligations and are deemed to possess information about or exert influence on virtual assets.

Celsius and BlockFi Filings Reveal Bhutan Crypto InvestmentThe tiny kingdom of Bhutan, nestled in the Himalayas, has been secretly holding millions of dollars in cryptocurrency, according to recent filings in the bankruptcy processes of crypto lenders Celsius and BlockFi. The revelation has surprised many observers, given the country’s reputation as a conservative and traditionalist society that places a high value on spiritual well-being and happiness over material wealth.©Pexels/Prateek KatyalDruk Holdings and InvestmentThe cryptocurrency holdings were reportedly managed by Bhutan’s Druk Holdings and Investment, which was established in 2018 with the aim of investing in a range of assets to help diversify the country’s economy and reduce its dependence on hydro-power exports. It’s understood that the fund had invested in a number of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple, and had seen significant gains as a result.While the exact amount of cryptocurrency held by the Bhutan Investment Fund is not known, a Forbes report estimates that it could be worth several million dollars. This represents a significant portion of Bhutan’s overall foreign reserves, which stood at $1.2 billion at the end of 2022.The news of Bhutan’s cryptocurrency holdings has sparked a debate about the role of digital assets in the country’s economy. Some experts have argued that cryptocurrencies could provide a valuable source of revenue for Bhutan, particularly as the country seeks to reduce its reliance on hydro-power exports. Others, however, have expressed concerns about the risks associated with investing in such a volatile and unpredictable asset class.A new frontier for investmentDespite these concerns, it appears that the Bhutan Investment Fund is committed to continuing its cryptocurrency investments. In a statement to Blockworks, the fund’s CEO, Tenzin Lekphell, said that “digital assets represent a new frontier for investment, and we believe that they have the potential to provide significant returns for our investors.”The news of Bhutan’s cryptocurrency holdings comes at a time when many countries around the world are grappling with the question of how to regulate and manage digital assets. While some countries, such as China, have taken a hardline approach and banned cryptocurrencies altogether, others, like Japan, have taken a more moderate approach and have sought to regulate the industry to prevent fraud and protect investors.Others still, like the United States and India have flip flopped on the subject with the United States having taken a regulatory hard line in recent months.A crypto opportunity for smaller nationsIt remains to be seen what approach Bhutan will take towards cryptocurrency regulation. However, the news of the country’s cryptocurrency holdings is a sign that even small, remote nations can take advantage of the opportunities provided by digital assets. On Tuesday Jason Lau, COO of crypto exchange Okcoin, stated that Bhutan’s investment was no surprise, with the expectation that other sovereign wealth funds would follow suit.Bhutan’s decision to invest in cryptocurrency has raised eyebrows in the international community. However, it is also a testament to the country’s willingness to explore new and innovative approaches to economic development. As the world continues to grapple with the opportunities and challenges posed by digital assets, Bhutan’s example may provide a valuable case study for other nations seeking to diversify their economies and embrace new technologies.