Game company behind XPLA blockchain witnesses growth in revenue last year

Global blockchain security ranking platform CertiK announced that its Skyfall research team has been inducted into the Samsung Mobile Security Rewards Program’s 2023 Hall of Fame, according to an article by South Korean news outlet Greenpost Korea on Thursday (KST).Photo by Franck on UnsplashTeamwork excellenceThis Hall of Fame recognizes outstanding security researchers who have made significant contributions each year to the security of Samsung products. CertiK Skyfall’s spot in the ranking highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in solving complex cybersecurity challenges, the company said. Securing the futureThe team was responsible for actively identifying a total of seven vulnerabilities in the Samsung Blockchain Keystore – a software development kit (SDK) developed by Samsung to manage private keys – four of which were critical and three of which were high risk. The vulnerabilities left the SDK susceptible to local attacks, including arbitrary code execution and unauthorized access to sensitive data. In response, Samsung was able to quickly deploy security patches that added appropriate boundary checks and protection mechanisms. Skyfall has formerly been acknowledged twice in Apple's release notes for discovering multiple vulnerabilities in new iOS and iPadOS software releases, the most recent being iOS 17 Security Update. Last June, the team was also awarded the Sui network’s highest bug bounty for discovering and fixing a critical vulnerability. "We are extremely proud of the outstanding performance of the CertiK Skyfall team," said Kang Li, Chief Security Officer at CertiK. "It is a testament to the team's professionalism, integrity and deep impact at the forefront of cybersecurity." CertiK is comprised of a team of seasoned experts from reputable universities including Yale and Columbia University and globally renowned companies like Google and Microsoft. The firm also operates from several offices around the world, including Seoul.

Binance’s U.S. legal woes may have repercussions for its expansion in ThailandWhile Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, is gearing up for a new trading venture in Thailand, the recent guilty plea by the firm in the United States and the hefty $4.3 billion penalties for anti-money laundering and sanctions violations have raised concerns about the feasibility of its Thai market venture.That’s a consideration that has been raised by a recent report by Bloomberg. Earlier this month, it emerged that Binance had entered the beta testing phase of its Binance.th platform in Thailand. The venture is a collaboration with the local company, Gulf Energy Development Pcl, led by billionaire Sarath Ratanavadi.Photo by Peter Borter on UnsplashCasting a shadow over expansion plansFollowing Founder Changpeng Zhao’s (CZ) departure from the CEO role in the wake of the US criminal probe resolution, Singaporean Richard Teng, a regulator-turned-crypto executive, has taken the helm at Binance. In its report, Bloomberg suggests that these recent issues in the U.S. have “cast a shadow over the planned domestic digital-asset platform” in Thailand.The new Binance CEO has emphasized Binance’s commitment to compliance overhaul and increased corporate transparency. In an interview Ratanavadi expressed confidence in Binance, noting that the company was not accused of crimes such as fraud or misuse of customer funds in the U.S. settlement. He stated:“Binance grew extremely fast and so probably crossed paths with some regulations.”Despite the regulatory storm, Ratanavadi chose Binance due to its market-leading position. The stringent scrutiny by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission and the approval process, including inquiries about Binance, reflect the regulator’s cautious approach. The Gulf Binance Co. platform is set to launch fully in January, with Gulf Energy holding a 51% stake and Binance the remaining share.Challenges in other Asian marketsThe company may also face additional challenges in other Asian markets as a consequence of its regulatory troubles in the United States. While it remains to be seen if this was an unrelated development, it emerged earlier this week that regulators in the Philippines were moving to block access to the Binance platform and curtail the exchange’s ability to target Filipinos through advertising.In South Korea, Binance’s activities in the country have come under renewed scrutiny within the crypto community in the wake of the regulatory penalties Binance has experienced in the U.S. Binance is active in that market through its acquisition of fiat-to-crypto exchange GOPAX. While GOPAX management are unfazed by these events, others have suggested that there may be consequences in terms of the ability of GOPAX to achieve full regulatory approval.Demand reductionAnother challenge for the Thai venture includes a reduction in demand for crypto trading services in the Southeast Asian country. Official data reveals a significant drop in monthly trading volume at licensed digital-asset operators in Thailand, falling from over 250 billion baht in November 2021 to 17 billion baht ($490 million) in September 2023. The number of active trading accounts has plummeted by 87% from the peak in 2021.Ratanavadi, whose net worth is estimated at $11 billion, believes that tighter regulatory oversight will restore investor confidence. Gulf Binance’s technology partner, Advanced Info Service Pcl, with its retail outlets, is expected to contribute to the joint venture’s marketing efforts.

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing ConcernsThere have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashPushing for regulatory oversightKang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.Echoes of past crypto platform controversiesThese concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”