Thai SEC seeks to revoke license of troubled Zipmex exchange

Bullish Emerges as a Bidder for Bankrupt FTX ExchangeBullish, a Gibraltar-based crypto exchange with strong ties to Asia, has emerged as a prominent bidder for the bankrupt trading platform FTX, which filed for bankruptcy protection in November last year.Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashValuable customer baseUp until that point, FTX was a thriving player in the cryptocurrency market. However, it is now in the process of seeking new ownership or financial restructuring to resurrect its operations. In a report published on Tuesday, The Block outlined that according to sources familiar with the situation, Bullish is eager to acquire FTX primarily for its valuable customer base.The news follows the filing of a stakeholder brief to the bankruptcy court in Delaware in the United States by the FTX Debtor on Monday. The brief outlined that the Debtor, led by new CEO John Ray, has reached out to more than 75 bidders to evaluate the potential relaunch of the FTX exchange business.Bullish aims to leverage FTX’s existing user network, intending to convert as many of them as possible into Bullish customers. However, it’s worth noting that this complex negotiation process may face challenges and uncertainties along the way.Asian connectionsAlthough it’s incorporated and registered in Gibraltar, only 4% of the company’s staff are Gibraltar-based. Meanwhile, the firm has offices in Singapore and Hong Kong with those locations accounting for 49% of the company’s overall workforce, according to LinkedIn data. Back in November the firm confirmed that it wasn’t one of the many crypto businesses with exposure to the FTX collapse.Bullish was founded by Brendan Blumer, with Bloomer currently acting as the exchange’s Chairman. Blumer previously founded Block.one, the developer behind the EOS blockchain. He also successfully founded and later exited Okay.com, Hong Kong’s largest digital property agency.Other Asia-centric players in the crypto sector had expressed interest in buying the FTX business (or parts of the business) earlier in the year. These included Singapore’s BSQ Capital and Gamepay, India’s CoinDCX, Japan’s 5G networks developer Docomo and e-commerce giant Rakuten, and Hong Kong’s OKC Holdings.Tribe Capital interestThe Block article also outlines that US-based Tribe Capital is another significant bidder in the running. Tribe Capital had FTX within its venture portfolio prior to the exchange’s downfall and subsequent bankruptcy at the close of the previous year. It had also appeared on the list of 363 sales parties back in June, and prior to that still, it had expressed its interest in buying the business.To establish a clear timeline for its business restructuring efforts, the estate has set a deadline for new bids, which falls on September 24. The FTX estate is still at an early stage in trying to resuscitate the business. Even if it’s successful in that endeavor, it’s not expected that a new business will emerge until Q2 2024 at the earliest.Separately, a criminal prosecution against FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried is progressing with a trial scheduled to take place in New York in October. Presently Bankman-Fried is incarcerated in a New York City jail while he awaits trial, having been found to have breached his bail conditions on the grounds of witness tampering.

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Hong Kong securities group proposes ICOs as growth opportunityKey stakeholders in Hong Kong’s financial world are contemplating a transformative shift in the Chinese autonomous territory’s digital asset strategy that concerns furthering initial coin offerings (ICOs).Photo by Qinyi Lian on UnsplashRoom for improvementIn a recent letter signed by Chen Zhihua, President of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) and published to the HKSFPA website on Wednesday, the introduction of an ICO mechanism as a potential catalyst for the city’s economic revival has been proposed.The letter, which provided the HKSFPA’s “opinions on the 2024–2025 budget,” included the ICO suggestion as recommendation №10 on a list of various proposals. The suggestion comes amid ongoing efforts to navigate the economic challenges posed by the pandemic. Zhihua acknowledges the developmental approach taken by Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee where financial sector strategy is concerned, but emphasizes the industry group’s belief in the room for improvement that exists to stimulate Hong Kong’s financial sector further.Formalizing ICOsFormalizing ICOs in Hong Kong could establish a supportive environment for crypto startups and investors seeking regulated and secure opportunities. The proposal aligns with a broader call for government engagement in economic recovery and policy-making, emphasizing a collaborative approach toward the crypto sector. This inclusive stance signals a forward-thinking perspective that could lead to more supportive policies and frameworks, fostering a conducive environment for crypto innovation and growth.Reflecting on the history of ICOs, the letter acknowledges the fundraising method’s evolution since the attention garnered by the Mastercoin ICO in 2013 and Ethereum’s significant milestone in 2014. The ICO boom of 2017 saw projects like EOS and Tezos raising substantial funds, accompanied by both enthusiasm for fundraising ease and concerns about investor protection due to minimal regulation.Fraud concernsWhile the ICO boom faced regulatory scrutiny and witnessed instances of fraud and scams, a progressive approach by financial regions such as Hong Kong could reshape the global perception of ICOs. The letter suggests that, under favorable terms, ICOs could play a pivotal role in revitalizing the digital asset landscape.Zhihua underscores the importance of addressing potential challenges by urgently reviewing and enhancing anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing legislation. This cautious approach aims to ensure that ICOs in Hong Kong adhere to established frameworks, avoiding the pitfalls associated with unregulated fundraising.While that’s the HKSFPA’s position, the initial flurry of ICOs a number of years ago involved many projects proposed by scammers and fraudsters. At the time, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) recognized the development as “downright fraud” and put pressure on exchanges to delist many tokens.One other related element that the letter proposes is in integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) and Islamic finance elements into investment immigration policies. This forward-thinking approach reflects a growing awareness of ethical and sustainable investment practices that could potentially position Hong Kong to set new standards for responsible investment.